Assessing Bat Detectability and Occupancy with Multiple Automated Echolocation Detectors

Abstract Occupancy analysis and its ability to account for differential detection probabilities is important for studies in which detecting echolocation calls is used as a measure of bat occurrence and activity. We examined the feasibility of remotely acquiring bat encounter histories to estimate detection probability and occupancy. We used echolocation detectors coupled to digital recorders operating at a series of proximate sites on consecutive nights in 2 trial surveys for the Hawaiian hoary bat (Lasiurus cinereus semotus). Our results confirmed that the technique is readily amenable for use in occupancy analysis. We also conducted a simulation exercise to assess the effects of sampling effort on parameter estimation. The results indicated that the precision and bias of parameter estimation were often more influenced by the number of sites sampled than number of visits. Acceptable accuracy often was not attained until at least 15 sites or 15 visits were used to estimate detection probability and occupancy. The method has significant potential for use in monitoring trends in bat activity and in comparative studies of habitat use.

[1]  D. MacKenzie.  WHAT ARE THE ISSUES WITH PRESENCE–ABSENCE DATA FOR WILDLIFE MANAGERS? , 2005 .

[2]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY RATES WHEN DETECTION PROBABILITIES ARE LESS THAN ONE , 2002, Ecology.

[3]  C. D. Vojta.  OLD DOG, NEW TRICKS: INNOVATIONS WITH PRESENCE–ABSENCE INFORMATION , 2005 .

[4]  R. Barclay,et al.  Foraging by bats in cleared, thinned and unharvested boreal forest , 2003 .

[5]  Charles R. Michael,et al.  The echolocation of flying insects by bats , 1960 .

[6]  D. MacKenzie.  Occupancy Estimation and Modeling: Inferring Patterns and Dynamics of Species Occurrence , 2005 .

[7]  B. Chruszcz,et al.  The influence of habitat structure on the ability to detect ultrasound using bat detectors , 2003 .

[8]  K. Burnham,et al.  Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals , 1999 .

[9]  J. Tougaard,et al.  Prey-capture success revealed by echolocation signals in pipistrelle bats (Pipistrellus pygmaeus) , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[10]  Keith A. Hobson,et al.  BAT ACTIVITY IN THE BOREAL FOREST: IMPORTANCE OF STAND TYPE AND VERTICAL STRATA , 1999 .

[11]  J. Hayes,et al.  Temporal Variation in Activity of Bats and the Design of Echolocation-Monitoring Studies , 1997 .

[12]  R. Barclay,et al.  Selection of Roosting and Foraging Habitat by Bats in Different‐Aged Aspen Mixedwood Stands , 1998 .

[13]  Brendan A. Wintle,et al.  ESTIMATING AND DEALING WITH DETECTABILITY IN OCCUPANCY SURVEYS FOR FOREST OWLS AND ARBOREAL MARSUPIALS , 2005 .

[14]  SCOTT A. FIELD,et al.  OPTIMIZING ALLOCATION OF MONITORING EFFORT UNDER ECONOMIC AND OBSERVATIONAL CONSTRAINTS , 2005 .

[15]  H. Broders.  Another Quantitative Measure of Bat Species Activity and Sampling Intensity Considerations for the Design of Ultrasonic Monitoring Studies , 2003 .

[16]  Darryl I. MacKenzie,et al.  Designing occupancy studies: general advice and allocating survey effort , 2005 .

[17]  P. Racey,et al.  Feeding ecology of Pipistrellus pipistrellus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) during pregnancy and lactation. I. Foraging behaviour , 1985 .

[18]  C. E. Johnson.  THE JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY. , 1920, Science.

[19]  C. J. Zabel,et al.  Variation in bat detections due to detector orientation in a forest. , 2002 .

[20]  H. Possingham,et al.  IMPROVING PRECISION AND REDUCING BIAS IN BIOLOGICAL SURVEYS: ESTIMATING FALSE‐NEGATIVE ERROR RATES , 2003 .

[21]  Douglas H. Johnson.  THE COMPARISON OF USAGE AND AVAILABILITY MEASUREMENTS FOR EVALUATING RESOURCE PREFERENCE , 1980 .

[22]  William N. Venables,et al.  An Introduction To R , 2004 .

[23]  J. Nichols,et al.  A DOUBLE-OBSERVER APPROACH FOR ESTIMATING DETECTION PROBABILITY AND ABUNDANCE FROM POINT COUNTS , 2000 .

[24]  Bruce W. Miller,et al.  A method for determining relative activity of free flying bats using a new activity index for acoustic monitoring , 2001 .

[25]  Bruce W. Miller,et al.  Qualitative Identification of Free-Flying Bats Using the Anabat Detector , 1999 .

[26]  T. O'Shea,et al.  Monitoring trends in bat populations of the United States and territories: status of the science and recommendations for the future , 2003 .

[27]  J. Hayes,et al.  Assumptions and practical considerations in the design and interpretation of echolocation-monitoring studies , 2000 .

[28]  R. Muzika,et al.  Effect of Forest Structure and Fragmentation on Site Occupancy of Bat Species in Missouri Ozark Forests , 2006 .

[29]  C. O’Donnell,et al.  Influence of season, habitat, temperature, and invertebrate availability on nocturnal activity of the New Zealand long‐tailed bat (Chalinolobus tuberculatus) , 2000 .

[30]  Joseph E. Duchamp,et al.  Estimating Probabilities of Detection for Bat Echolocation Calls: An Application of the Double-Observer Method , 2006 .

[31]  C. Weber,et al.  Foraging habitat preferences of bats in relation to food supply and spatial vegetation structures in a western European low mountain range forest , 2004 .

[32]  E. Britzke,et al.  Surveying bat communities: a comparison between mist nets and the Anabat II bat detector system , 1999 .