Comparison of hydrogen storage with diesel-generator system in a PV–WEC hybrid system

Abstract Hydrogen as a storage medium in renewable energy systems has been the subject of various studies in recent years. Such a system consists of a long-term and a short-term storage system. In a battery, energy is stored for short term whereas the electrolyser, H 2 -tank and fuel cell combination is used for long-term energy storage to increase the reliability of supply. The same purpose can be achieved by introducing a diesel generator instead of long-term storage. The advantage of such a system is that it needs low investment cost. However, the main disadvantage is that it needs to supply fuel for the operation of the generator. The advantage of hydrogen-based long-term storage over a diesel generator is that it does not need any supply of fuel. In photovoltaic–wind–diesel hybrid systems, the surplus energy during the good season is not stored. In the present study, the possible sites for renewable applications are specified depending on the seasonal renewable energy variation and fuel cost at the site of application. The critical fuel cost is calculated depending on the seasonal solar and wind energy difference. The actual fuel cost at the site of application is compared with critical fuel cost. To find out the actual fuel cost at the location of application, the transportation cost is also included. If the actual fuel cost is higher than the critical fuel cost, the location is cost-effective for hydrogen-based storage. Otherwise, the site is suitable for a diesel-generator backup system. It is found that at present hydrogen storage is not cost-effective compare to a diesel-generator-based system. In the near future when the target cost of the electrolyser and the fuel cell is achieved, the scope of the hydrogen-based storage system will also increase and it will also be cost competitive with diesel-generator system for remote applications.

[1]  Ari Rabl,et al.  Active solar collectors and their applications , 1985 .

[2]  Chemmangot Nayar,et al.  An optimum dispatch strategy using set points for a photovoltaic (PV)–diesel–battery hybrid power system , 1999 .

[3]  Pertti Kauranen,et al.  Operation experiences of a phosphoric acid fuel cell in a solar hydrogen energy system , 1997 .

[4]  Richard Perez,et al.  Operational experience of a residential photovoltaic hybrid system , 1999 .

[5]  D. Butler Requirements for batteries in remote-area power-supply systems based on technical modelling and field experience , 1996 .

[6]  Bernd Emonts,et al.  PHOEBUS—an autonomous supply system with renewable energy: six years of operational experience and advanced concepts , 1999 .

[7]  Charles C. Sorrell,et al.  Photo-electrochemical hydrogen generation from water using solar energy. Materials-related aspects , 2002 .

[8]  M. A. Elhadidy,et al.  Performance evaluation of hybrid (wind/solar/diesel) power systems , 2002 .

[9]  P. Lehman,et al.  Operating experience with a photovoltaic-hydrogen energy system , 1997 .

[10]  H. Barthels,et al.  Phoebus-Jülich: An autonomous energy supply system comprising photovoltaics, electrolytic hydrogen, fuel cell , 1998 .

[11]  A Szyszka,et al.  Ten years of solar hydrogen demonstration project at Neunburg vorm Wald, Germany , 1998 .

[12]  Pertti Kauranen,et al.  Development of a self-sufficient solar-hydrogen energy system , 1994 .

[13]  J. Samimi,et al.  Optimal sizing of photovoltaic systems in varied climates , 1997 .

[14]  A. Louche,et al.  DESIGN OF HYBRID-PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER GENERATOR, WITH OPTIMIZATION OF ENERGY MANAGEMENT , 1999 .

[15]  A. Szyszka Neunburg vorm wald — Test centre for solar hydrogen technology , 1994 .

[16]  P. Hollmuller,et al.  Evaluation of a 5 kWp photovoltaic hydrogen production and storage installation for a residential home in Switzerland , 2000 .