The Affection Effect in Insurance Decisions

We use insurance behavior as a context to study affective influences in seemingly purely monetary decisions. We report two related findings. First, people are more willing to purchase insurance for an object at stake, the more affection they have for the object, holding the amount of compensation constant. Second, if the object is damaged, people are also more willing to go through the trouble of claiming a fixed amount of compensation, the more affection they have for the object. These effects are not predicted by standard decision theories. We explain these findings by a “consolation hypothesis,” according to which, people perceive insurance compensation as a token of consolation, and we discuss its implications for affective influences in other types of decisions.

[1]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  The Framing of Decisions and the Rationality of Choice. , 1980 .

[2]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  Insurer ambiguity and market failure , 1993 .

[3]  Richard A. Posner,et al.  Economic Analysis of Law , 1974 .

[4]  I. Ritov,et al.  Decision Affect Theory: Emotional Reactions to the Outcomes of Risky Options , 1997 .

[5]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Source dependence in the valuation of objects , 1994 .

[6]  A. Tversky,et al.  Probabilistic Insurance , 1998 .

[7]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[8]  Christopher K. Hsee Elastic Justification: How Tempting But Task-Irrelevant Factors Influence Decisions , 1995 .

[9]  Ilana Ritov,et al.  Economic Preferences or Attitude Expressions?: An Analysis of Dollar Responses to Public Issues , 1999 .

[10]  P. Cook,et al.  The Demand for Insurance and Protection: The Case of Irreplaceable Commodities , 1977 .

[11]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives , 1996 .

[12]  Stephen M. Johnson,et al.  The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits , 2000 .

[13]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  Low-probability insurance decisions: The role of concern , 2002 .

[14]  P. Slovic,et al.  The affect heuristic , 2007, European Journal of Operational Research.

[15]  Insurer Ambiguity and Market Failure , 1993 .

[16]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Options: A Review and Theoretical Analysis , 1999 .

[17]  G. Loewenstein Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior , 1996 .

[18]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Framing, probability distortions, and insurance decisions , 1993 .

[19]  R. Thaler Saving, Fungibility, and Mental Accounts , 1990 .

[20]  H. Kunreuther,et al.  Worry and the illusion of safety: Evidence from a real-objects experiment , 2002 .

[21]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Emotional Trade-Off Difficulty and Choice: , 1999 .

[22]  H Kunreuther,et al.  Determinants of Priority for Risk Reduction: The Role of Worry , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[23]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[24]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  Risk Analysis and Risk Management in an Uncertain World 1 , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[25]  P. Slovic,et al.  Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. , 1971 .

[26]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  Decision making under ignorance: Arguing with yourself , 1995 .

[27]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Risk as Feelings , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  H. Kunreuther Mitigating disaster losses through insurance , 1996 .

[29]  Eldar Shafir,et al.  Reason-based choice , 1993, Cognition.