Comparison of optical LAI measurements under diffuse and clear skies after correcting for scattered radiation

Abstract Leaf area index (LAI) is a forest canopy variable that is closely related to forest growth and health. The LAI-2000 Plant Canopy Analyzer is widely used for indirect measurement of LAI; however, use of the instrument is limited to diffuse sky conditions, greatly restricting sampling. A new bidirectional transmission model allows measurements to be obtained under clear sky conditions. This is accomplished by calculating a correction factor to reduce the impact of scattered light from canopy elements on gap fraction estimates. In this study we evaluate this technique by contrasting LAI measurements taken under diffuse and clear skies in a Pinus radiata D. Don plantation. We also evaluate the importance of obtaining accurate needle optical properties to parameterise the scattering correction model. Clear sky LAI estimates calculated with (a) measured optical values of P. radiata needles, (b) default values from the instrument software, and (c) maximum published values were compared to diffuse sky LAI estimates. Agreement was strongest where measured optical properties were used ( R 2  = 0.87), with the relationship weakening under the default ( R 2  = 0.78), and maximum value ( R 2  = 0.67) scenarios. Under these three scenarios average clear sky LAI exceeded diffuse sky LAI by 16%, 17%, and 22%, respectively. The disagreement was due in part to erroneous measurements from the outer sensor ring under diffuse skies. With these data removed agreement improved markedly under all scenarios ( R 2  = 0.94, 0.89, and 0.75, respectively), and the mean differences under each scenario declined to 8%, 9%, and 15%, respectively. Measurement of LAI under clear skies appeared to reduce error in the outer ring, greatly reduced logistical constraints, and reduced errors associated with sky variability.

[1]  Euan G. Mason,et al.  Comparison of direct and indirect leaf area index measurements of Pinus radiata D. Don , 2012 .

[2]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[3]  John M. Norman,et al.  On the correct estimation of gap fraction: How to remove scattered radiation in gap fraction measurements? , 2013 .

[4]  Mark O. Kimberley,et al.  Leaf Area Index, Biomass Carbon and Growth Rate of Radiata Pine Genetic Types and Relationships with LiDAR , 2011 .

[5]  N. Goel,et al.  Needle chlorophyll content estimation through model inversion using hyperspectral data from boreal conifer forest canopies , 2004 .

[6]  S. T. Gower,et al.  Leaf area index of boreal forests: theory, techniques, and measurements , 1997 .

[7]  Erik Næsset,et al.  Mapping defoliation during a severe insect attack on Scots pine using airborne laser scanning , 2006 .

[8]  Hideki Kobayashi,et al.  On the correct estimation of effective leaf area index: does it reveal information on clumping effects? , 2010 .

[9]  P. Stenberg,et al.  Performance of the LAI-2000 plant canopy analyzer in estimating leaf area index of some Scots pine stands. , 1994, Tree physiology.

[10]  S. T. Gower,et al.  Direct and Indirect Estimation of Leaf Area Index, fAPAR, and Net Primary Production of Terrestrial Ecosystems , 1999 .

[11]  R. Küssner,et al.  Comparison of direct and indirect estimation of leaf area index in mature Norway spruce stands of eastern Germany , 2000 .

[12]  J. Welles,et al.  Canopy structure measurement by gap fraction analysis using commercial instrumentation , 1996 .

[13]  Oliver Sonnentag,et al.  Leaf area index measurements at Fluxnet-Canada forest sites , 2006 .

[14]  Frédéric Baret,et al.  Review of methods for in situ leaf area index determination Part I. Theories, sensors and hemispherical photography , 2004 .

[15]  Erik Næsset,et al.  Mapping LAI in a Norway spruce forest using airborne laser scanning , 2009 .

[16]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  A comparison of field-based and modelled reflectance spectra from damaged Pinus radiata foliage , 2005 .

[17]  F. Baret,et al.  Review of methods for in situ leaf area index (LAI) determination: Part II. Estimation of LAI, errors and sampling , 2004 .

[18]  Craig S. T. Daughtry,et al.  A new technique to measure the spectral properties of conifer needles , 1989 .

[19]  G. Carter,et al.  Leaf optical properties in higher plants: linking spectral characteristics to stress and chlorophyll concentration. , 2001, American journal of botany.

[20]  Sylvain G. Leblanc,et al.  A practical scheme for correcting multiple scattering effects on optical LAI measurements , 2001 .

[21]  Valerie A. Thomas,et al.  Estimating leaf area index in intensively managed pine plantations using airborne laser scanner data , 2012 .

[22]  Takeshi Motohka,et al.  Accurate measurement of optical properties of narrow leaves and conifer needles with a typical integrating sphere and spectroradiometer. , 2013, Plant, cell & environment.

[23]  Michael E. Schaepman,et al.  Minimizing Measurement Uncertainties of Coniferous Needle-Leaf Optical Properties, Part I: Methodological Review , 2014, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[24]  Jing M. Chen,et al.  Determining digital hemispherical photograph exposure for leaf area index estimation , 2005 .

[25]  Simon D. Jones,et al.  Understanding the variability in ground-based methods for retrieving canopy openness, gap fraction, and leaf area index in diverse forest systems , 2015 .

[26]  Youngryel Ryu,et al.  Digital canopy photography: Exposed and in the raw , 2014 .

[27]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[28]  A. Lang,et al.  Leaf area and average leaf angle from transmission of direct sunlight , 1986 .

[29]  J. Carlyle.  Relationships between nitrogen uptake, leaf area, water status and growth in an 11-year-old Pinus radiata plantation in response to thinning, thinning residue, and nitrogen fertiliser , 1998 .

[30]  N. Breda.  Ground-based measurements of leaf area index: a review of methods, instruments and current controversies. , 2003, Journal of experimental botany.