INSTRUMENTATION TECHNIQUES IN SIMULATED CANALS

[1]  C J Ruddle,et al.  The ProTaper endodontic system: geometries, features, and guidelines for use. , 2001, Dentistry today.

[2]  T. Svec,et al.  Analysis of Ni-Ti versus stainless steel instrumentation in resin simulated canals. , 1997, Journal of endodontics.

[3]  L Bergmans,et al.  Mechanical root canal preparation with NiTi rotary instruments: rationale, performance and safety. Status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. , 2001, American journal of dentistry.

[4]  P. Esposito,et al.  A comparison of canal preparation with nickel-titanium and stainless steel instruments. , 1995, Journal of endodontics.

[5]  Helmut Walsch,et al.  The hybrid concept of nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation. , 2004, Dental clinics of North America.

[6]  S. W. Schneider,et al.  A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. , 1971, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[7]  L S Buchanan,et al.  The standardized-taper root canal preparation, Part 1: Concepts for variably tapered shaping instruments. , 1999, Dentistry today.

[8]  B. Karabucak,et al.  Comparison of apical transportation between ProFile and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments. , 2004, International endodontic journal.

[9]  O. Peters,et al.  ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: effects of canal anatomy on final shape analysed by micro CT. , 2003, International endodontic journal.

[10]  S B Dove,et al.  A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven, and K-Flex endodontic instruments. , 1995, Journal of endodontics.

[11]  G. Chiandussi,et al.  Comparative analysis of torsional and bending stresses in two mathematical models of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: ProTaper versus ProFile. , 2003, Journal of endodontics.

[12]  E Schäfer,et al.  Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. , 2004, International endodontic journal.

[13]  D. Clement,et al.  Effect of tip design of nickel-titanium and stainless steel files on root canal preparation. , 1997, Journal of endodontics.

[14]  H. Gerstein,et al.  An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. , 1988, Journal of endodontics.

[15]  L Bergmans,et al.  Progressive versus constant tapered shaft design using NiTi rotary instruments. , 2003, International endodontic journal.

[16]  R. D. De Moor,et al.  Shaping ability of ProTaper nickel-titanium files in simulated resin root canals. , 2004, International endodontic journal.

[17]  Edgar Schäfer,et al.  Comparison of hand stainless steel and nickel titanium rotary instrumentation: a clinical study. , 2004, Journal of endodontics.

[18]  F S Weine,et al.  The effect of preparation procedures on original canal shape and on apical foramen shape. , 1975, Journal of Endodontics.

[19]  S. Montgomery,et al.  The effects of four instrumentation techniques on root canal shape. , 1988, Journal of endodontics.

[20]  H Schilder,et al.  Cleaning and shaping the root canal. , 1974, Dental clinics of North America.

[21]  Gary R Hartwell,et al.  K3 Endo, ProTaper, and ProFile systems: breakage and distortion in severely curved roots of molars. , 2004, Journal of endodontics.

[22]  J. Baumgartner,et al.  An analysis of canal centering using mechanical instrumentation techniques. , 1999, Journal of endodontics.