Disk diffusion versus broth microdilution susceptibility testing of Haemophilus species and Moraxella catarrhalis using seven oral antimicrobial agents: application of updated susceptibility guidelines of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards

Susceptibility testing of Haemophilus species and Moraxella catarrhalis is medium and inoculum dependent. Seven oral agents, ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefaclor, loracarbef, cefuroxime-axetil, cefixime, and erythromycin, were tested against 400 beta-lactamase-positive and -negative clinically significant respiratory strains of Haemophilus species and 100 strains of M. catarrhalis. Sources of the strains included teaching and regional hospitals and a private laboratory. All strains were tested by broth microdilution and disk diffusion in haemophilus test medium for Haemophilus species and Mueller-Hinton broth and agar for M. catarrhalis. Appropriate National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) standards were followed. For Haemophilus species, by disk diffusion and broth microdilution, respectively, 27 and 27% of strains were resistant to ampicillin, 37 and 5% were resistant to erythromycin, 3 and 0.5% were resistant to cefaclor, 2 and 0.5% were resistant to loracarbef, and 0% were resistant to cefuroxime-axetil, cefixime, and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. beta-Lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant strains were not observed. Of M. catarrhalis strains, 56% were resistant to ampicillin by disk diffusion and 95% were resistant by broth microdilution. This species was susceptible to all other agents tested by either method. The disagreements between disk diffusion results and MICs for cefaclor, ampicillin, cefuroxime, and loracarbef that occurred with use of the 1990 NCCLS tables were resolved when the 1992 NCCLS tables were used.

[1]  G. Doern In Vitro Susceptibility Testing of Haemophilus influenzae: Review of New National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Recommendations , 1993, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[2]  G. Doern In vitro susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae: review of new National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards recommendations , 1992 .

[3]  D. Low,et al.  Broth microdilution testing of Haemophilus influenzae with haemophilus test medium versus lysed horse blood broth. Canadian Haemophilus Study Group , 1992, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[4]  J. Heelan,et al.  Investigation of ampicillin-intermediate strains of Haemophilus influenzae by using the disk diffusion procedure and current National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards guidelines , 1992, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[5]  J. Jorgensen,et al.  Update on mechanisms and prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in Haemophilus influenzae. , 1992, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[6]  Ronald N. Jones,et al.  The re-evaluation of the NCCLS ampicillin susceptibility tests with Haemophilus test medium: New interpretive criteria for the disk diffusion method , 1992 .

[7]  C. Rivet Susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae to antimicrobial agents used in Canada. , 1991, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[8]  J. Jorgensen,et al.  Reproducibility of disc susceptibility tests with Haemophilus influenzae. , 1991, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[9]  G. Doern,et al.  Antimicrobial resistance among respiratory isolates of Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States , 1990, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[10]  B. Catlin Branhamella catarrhalis: an organism gaining respect as a pathogen , 1990, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.

[11]  T. Stull,et al.  Problems with current recommendations for susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae , 1990, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[12]  G. Doern,et al.  In vitro activities of 39 antimicrobial agents for Branhamella catarrhalis and comparison of results with different quantitative susceptibility test methods , 1988, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[13]  J. Jorgensen,et al.  Improved medium for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae , 1987, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[14]  G. Doern,et al.  Disk diffusion susceptibility testing of Branhamella catarrhalis with ampicillin and seven other antimicrobial agents , 1987, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[15]  M. Bergeron,et al.  Influence of growth medium and supplement on growth of Haemophilus influenzae and on antibacterial activity of several antibiotics , 1987, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[16]  T. Stull,et al.  Problems withCurrent Recommendations forSusceptibility Testing ofHaemophilus influenzae , 1990 .

[17]  G. Doern,et al.  InVitro Activities of39Antimicrobial Agents forBranhamella catarrhalis andComparison ofResults withDifferent Quantitative Susceptibility TestMethods , 1988 .