On the complementarity of electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography

We show that for the spherical model of the brain, the part of the neuronal current that generates the electric potential (and therefore the electric field) lives in the orthogonal complement of the part of the current that generates the magnetic potential (and therefore the magnetic induction field). This means that for a continuously distributed neuronal current, information missing in the electroencephalographic data is precisely information that is available in the magnetoencephalographic data, and vice versa. In this way, the notion of complementarity between the imaging techniques of electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography is mathematically defined. Using this notion of complementarity and expanding the neuronal current in terms of vector spherical harmonics, which by definition provide the angular dependence of the current, we show that if the electric and the magnetic potentials in the exterior of the head are given, then we can determine certain moments of the functions which provide the radial dependence of the neuronal current. In addition to the above notion of complementarity, we also present a notion of unification of electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography by showing that they are governed respectively by the scalar and the vector invariants of a unified dyadic field describing electromagnetoencephalography.

[1]  Peter Monk,et al.  The inverse source problem for Maxwell's equations , 2006 .

[2]  George Dassios,et al.  On the non-uniqueness of the inverse MEG problem , 2005 .

[3]  A. Fokas,et al.  The unique determination of neuronal currents in the brain via magnetoencephalography , 2004, physics/0412028.

[4]  R. Leahy,et al.  On MEG forward modelling using multipolar expansions. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  I. Gelfand,et al.  Inversion method for magnetoencephalography , 1996 .

[6]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[7]  J. B. Bronzan,et al.  The Magnetic Scalar Potential , 1971 .

[8]  D. Geselowitz On the magnetic field generated outside an inhomogeneous volume conductor by internal current sources , 1970 .

[9]  D. B. Heppner,et al.  Considerations of quasi-stationarity in electrophysiological systems. , 1967, The Bulletin of mathematical biophysics.

[10]  E. Frank Electric Potential Produced by Two Point Current Sources in a Homogeneous Conducting Sphere , 1952 .

[11]  George Dassios,et al.  Electric and Magnetic Activity of the Brain in Spherical and Ellipsoidal Geometry , 2009 .

[12]  G. Nolte Brain current multipole expansion in realistic volume conductors: Calculation, interpretation and results , 2002 .

[13]  J. Sarvas Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  D. Geselowitz On bioelectric potentials in an inhomogeneous volume conductor. , 1967, Biophysical journal.

[15]  L. Brand,et al.  Vector and tensor analysis , 1947 .