Validation of a method for measuring the volumetric breast density from digital mammograms

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of an algorithm used to measure the volumetric breast density (VBD) from digital mammograms. The algorithm is based on the calibration of the detector signal versus the thickness and composition of breast-equivalent phantoms. The baseline error in the density from the algorithm was found to be 1.25 ± 2.3% VBD units (PVBD) when tested against a set of calibration phantoms, of thicknesses 3–8 cm, with compositions equivalent to fibroglandular content (breast density) between 0% and 100% and under x-ray beams between 26 kVp and 32 kVp with a Rh/Rh anode/filter. The algorithm was also tested against images from a dedicated breast computed tomography (CT) scanner acquired on 26 volunteers. The CT images were segmented into regions representing adipose, fibroglandular and skin tissues, and then deformed using a finite-element algorithm to simulate the effects of compression in mammography. The mean volume, VBD and thickness of the compressed breast for these deformed images were respectively 558 cm3, 23.6% and 62 mm. The displaced CT images were then used to generate simulated digital mammograms, considering the effects of the polychromatic x-ray spectrum, the primary and scattered energy transmitted through the breast, the anti-scatter grid and the detector efficiency. The simulated mammograms were analyzed with the VBD algorithm and compared with the deformed CT volumes. With the Rh/Rh anode filter, the root mean square difference between the VBD from CT and from the algorithm was 2.6 PVBD, and a linear regression between the two gave a slope of 0.992 with an intercept of −1.4 PVBD and a correlation with R2 = 0.963. The results with the Mo/Mo and Mo/Rh anode/filter were similar.

[1]  M J Yaffe,et al.  The myth of the 50-50 breast. , 2009, Medical physics.

[2]  Ann-Katherine Carton,et al.  The effect of scatter and glare on image quality in contrast-enhanced breast imaging using an a-Si/CsI(TI) full-field flat panel detector. , 2009, Medical physics.

[3]  Gordon E Mawdsley,et al.  Accurate estimation of compressed breast thickness in mammography. , 2009, Medical physics.

[4]  Gordon E Mawdsley,et al.  Measurement of compressed breast thickness by optical stereoscopic photogrammetry. , 2009, Medical physics.

[5]  David Gavaghan,et al.  Predicting Tumor Location by Modeling the Deformation of the Breast , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  J. Boone,et al.  The effect of skin thickness determined using breast CT on mammographic dosimetry. , 2008, Medical physics.

[7]  J. Boone,et al.  Dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience. , 2008, Radiology.

[8]  M. Daly,et al.  Dietary intake and breast density in high-risk women: a cross-sectional study , 2007, Breast Cancer Research.

[9]  L. Kolonel,et al.  Mammographic density and dietary patterns: the multiethnic cohort , 2007, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.

[10]  John M. Boone,et al.  Simulation of Mechanical Compression of Breast Tissue , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Frank D Gilliland,et al.  Physical activity, body mass index, and mammographic density in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  N. Boyd,et al.  Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  John M. Boone,et al.  Computed Tomography for Imaging the Breast , 2006, Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia.

[14]  John M. Boone,et al.  TU-C-330D-03: Computed Tomography of the Breast: Design, Fabrication, Characterization, and Initial Clinical Testing , 2006 .

[15]  J. Schnabel,et al.  Factors influencing the accuracy of biomechanical breast models. , 2006, Medical physics.

[16]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms , 2006, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[17]  John M Boone,et al.  Technique factors and their relationship to radiation dose in pendant geometry breast CT. , 2005, Medical physics.

[18]  John M Boone,et al.  Technique factors and their relationship to radiation dose in pendant geometry breast CT. , 2005, Medical physics.

[19]  G Wang,et al.  ImageParser: a tool for finite element generation from three-dimensional medical images , 2004, Biomedical engineering online.

[20]  Dmitry B. Goldgof,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element model for lesion correspondence in breast imaging , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[21]  J. Otten,et al.  Mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: Masking bias or causality? , 1998, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[22]  Dan Rico,et al.  A volumetric method for estimation of breast density on digitized screen-film mammograms. , 2003, Medical physics.

[23]  J. Kaufhold,et al.  A calibration approach to glandular tissue composition estimation in digital mammography. , 2002, Medical physics.

[24]  John A Shepherd,et al.  Measurement of breast density with dual X-ray absorptiometry: feasibility. , 2002, Radiology.

[25]  J. Heine,et al.  Mammographic tissue, breast cancer risk, serial image analysis, and digital mammography. Part 2. Serial breast tissue change and related temporal influences. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[26]  J. Heine,et al.  Mammographic tissue, breast cancer risk, serial image analysis, and digital mammography. Part 1. Tissue and related risk factors. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[27]  J. Boone,et al.  Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation. , 2001, Radiology.

[28]  J. Boone,et al.  Scatter/primary in mammography: comprehensive results. , 2000, Medical physics.

[29]  J M Boone,et al.  Scatter/primary in mammography: Monte Carlo validation. , 2000, Medical physics.

[30]  R Holland,et al.  High mammographic breast density and its implications for the early detection of breast cancer , 1999, Journal of medical screening.

[31]  Michael Brady,et al.  Mammographic Image Analysis , 1999, Computational Imaging and Vision.

[32]  S. Duffy,et al.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns and mode of detection: implications for the breast screening programme , 1998, Journal of medical screening.

[33]  M J Yaffe,et al.  X-ray characterization of breast phantom materials. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  T. R. Fewell,et al.  Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography. , 1997, Medical physics.

[35]  Michael Brady,et al.  A Representation for Mammographic Image Processing , 1995, CVRMed.

[36]  J A Rowlands,et al.  Origins of flare in x-ray image intensifiers. , 1990, Medical physics.

[37]  N F Boyd,et al.  Mammographic parenchymal pattern and breast cancer risk: a critical appraisal of the evidence. , 1988, American journal of epidemiology.

[38]  P. C. Johns,et al.  X-ray characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast tissues. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[39]  M. Szklo,et al.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns and breast cancer risk. , 1987, Epidemiologic reviews.

[40]  J Whitehead,et al.  Wolfe mammographic parenchymal patterns. A study of the masking hypothesis of Egan and Mosteller , 1985, Cancer.

[41]  R. Siddon.  Fast calculation of the exact radiological path for a three-dimensional CT array. , 1985, Medical physics.

[42]  J. S. Laughlin,et al.  Absorbed radiation dose in mammography. , 1979, Radiology.

[43]  J. Best,et al.  Computed tomography of the breast. , 1978, Clinical oncology.

[44]  J. Wolfe.  Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. , 1976, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[45]  J. Wolfe.  Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern , 1976, Cancer.