Patients and Medical Staff Attitudes Toward the Future Inclusion of eHealth in Tuberculosis Management: Perspectives From Six Countries Evaluated using a Qualitative Framework (Preprint)

BACKGROUND Digitally delivering healthcare services is very attractive for tuberculosis (TB) management as this disease has a complex diagnosis and lengthy management and involves multiple medical and nonmedical specialists. Especially in low- and middle-income countries, eHealth could potentially offer cost-effective solutions to bridge financial, social, time, and distance challenges. OBJECTIVE The goal of the research is to understand what would make eHealth globally applicable and gain insight into different TB situations, opportunities, and challenges. METHODS We performed focus group interviews with TB experts and patients from 6 different countries on 4 different continents. The focus group interviews followed the theory of planned behavior framework to offer structured recommendations for a versatile eHealth solution. The focus group interviews were preceded by a general demographic and technology use questionnaire. Questionnaire results were analyzed using basic statistics in Excel (Microsoft Corporation). Focus group interview data were analyzed using ATLAS.ti 8 (ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH) by assigning codes to quotations and grouping codes into the 5 domains within the framework. RESULTS A total of 29 patients and 32 medical staff members were included in our study. All medical staff had used the internet, whereas 31% (9/61) of patients had never been online. The codes with the most quotations were information in relation to eHealth (144 quotations) and communication (67 quotations). The consensus among all participants from all countries is that there are important communication and information gaps that could be bridged by an eHealth app. Participants from different countries also highlighted different challenges, such as a majority of asylum-seeker patients or lack of infrastructure that could be addressed with an eHealth app. CONCLUSIONS Within the 6 countries interviewed, there is high enthusiasm toward eHealth in TB. A potential app could first target information and communication gaps in TB, with additional modules aimed at setting-specific challenges.

[1]  Md. Rakibul Hoque,et al.  Patient Acceptance of e-Health Services in Saudi Arabia: An Integrative Perspective. , 2019, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[2]  José António Nhavoto,et al.  Mobile health treatment support intervention for HIV and tuberculosis in Mozambique: Perspectives of patients and healthcare workers , 2017, PloS one.

[3]  M. Davhana-Maselesele,et al.  Experiences of patients having tuberculosis (TB) regarding the use of Directly Observed Treatment Short-Course (DOTS) in the North West Province, South Africa , 2016, Curationis.

[4]  K. Patrick,et al.  Feasibility of tuberculosis treatment monitoring by video directly observed therapy: a binational pilot study. , 2015, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[5]  Hamish S. F. Fraser,et al.  Reducing Communication Delays and Improving Quality of Care with a Tuberculosis Laboratory Information System in Resource Poor Environments: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial , 2014, PloS one.

[6]  Jonathan Karnon,et al.  Home Videophones Improve Direct Observation in Tuberculosis Treatment: A Mixed Methods Evaluation , 2012, PloS one.

[7]  M. Maneno,et al.  Treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in a remote, conflict-affected area of the Democratic Republic of Congo [Notes from the field]. , 2012, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[8]  D. Manissero,et al.  Knowledge of tuberculosis-treatment prescription of health workers: a systematic review , 2011, European Respiratory Journal.

[9]  F. Scott,et al.  ASUM Press Release , 2011, Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine.

[10]  P. Sainsbury,et al.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. , 2007, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[11]  D. Morgan Focus groups for qualitative research. , 1988, Hospital guest relations report.

[12]  J. Walley,et al.  Barriers to hospital and tuberculosis programme collaboration in China: context matters. , 2015, Global health action.