Where Does Metonymy Stop? Senses, Facets, and Active Zones

The purpose of this article is to propose a constrained lexical semantic definition of referential metonymy within a model of meaning as ontology and construal. Due to their various types of lexical-referential pairings, 3 types of construals that are frequently referred to as metonymy in the cognitive literature are distinguished as metonymization, facetization, and zone activation. Metonymization involves the use of a lexical item to evoke the sense of something that is not conventionally linked to that particular lexical item. It is argued that metonymy is a contingent relation that stops at the sense level. Facetization and zone activation both involve the use of conventional pairings of lexical items and contextual readings. Facetization takes place within senses at the level of qualia structure and zone activation takes place within qualia structure. Zone activation is a ubiquitous phenomenon that concerns all readings, senses as well facets.

[1]  David D. Clarke,et al.  Polysemy : flexible patterns of meaning in mind and language , 2003 .

[2]  Ronald W. Langacker,et al.  Grammar and conceptualization , 1999 .

[3]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live By , 1980 .

[4]  R. Giora.  Literal vs. figurative language: Different or equal? , 2002 .

[5]  E. H. Hutten,et al.  SEMANTICS , 1953, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[6]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  Conceptual spaces - the geometry of thought , 2000 .

[7]  P. Vossen,et al.  The EuroWordNet Base Concepts and Top Ontology , 1998 .

[8]  Yo Matsumoto.  Subjective motion and English and Japanese verbs , 1996 .

[9]  R. Langacker.  Reference-point constructions , 1993 .

[10]  R. Giora.  Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis , 1997 .

[11]  D. A. Cruse,et al.  Computational lexical semantics: Polysemy and related phenomena from a cognitive linguistic viewpoint , 1995 .

[12]  Hans-Jörg Schmid,et al.  English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells , 2001, English and American Studies in German.

[13]  George Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things , 1987 .

[14]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING , 1988 .

[15]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Ad hoc categories , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[16]  B. Warren.  Aspects of Referential Metonymy , 1999 .

[17]  R. Gibbs.  The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding , 1994 .

[18]  Beatrice Warren,et al.  An Alternative Account of the Interpretation of Referential Metonymy and Metaphor , 2003 .

[19]  Z. Harris,et al.  Foundations of Language , 1940 .

[20]  J. Gibbs.  Speaking and Thinking with Metonymy , 1999 .

[21]  K. Shadan,et al.  Available Online at , 2002 .

[22]  Iryna Gurevych,et al.  Contextual Coherence in Natural Language Processing , 2003, CONTEXT.

[23]  R. Dirven,et al.  Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast , 2003 .

[24]  R. Giora.  On Our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language , 2003 .

[25]  Bas Aarts,et al.  Exploring Natural Language: Working with the British Component of the International Corpus of English , 2002 .

[26]  Richard J. Vondruska,et al.  Salience, similes, and the asymmetry of similarity , 1985 .

[27]  R. Langacker.  Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .

[28]  M J Pickering,et al.  The processing of metonymy: evidence from eye movements. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez,et al.  The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy , 2003 .

[30]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  The Generative Lexicon , 1995, CL.

[31]  Hans-Jörg Schmid,et al.  English abstract nouns as conceptual shells : from corpus to cognition , 2000 .

[32]  G. Murphy,et al.  The Big Book of Concepts , 2002 .

[33]  Z. Harris,et al.  Foundations of language , 1941 .

[34]  Carita Paradis.  Adjectives and boundedness , 2001 .

[35]  Günter Radden,et al.  Metonymy in language and thought , 1999 .

[36]  S. W. Holmes.  Meaning in language , 1972 .

[37]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies , 1993 .

[38]  Klaus-Uwe Panther.  The Potentiality for Actuality Metonymy in English and Hungarian , 1999 .

[39]  Beatrice Warren.  The role of links and/or qualia in modifier-head constructions , 2003 .

[40]  Günter Radden,et al.  Towards a Theory of Metonymy , 1999 .

[41]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  Construal operations in linguistics and artificial intelligence , 2000 .

[42]  Carita Paradis,et al.  Is the notion of linguistic competence relevant in Cognitive Linguistics , 2003 .

[43]  R. Giora,et al.  On understanding familiar and less-familiar figurative language☆ , 1999 .