Structural alerts--a new classification model to discriminate excess toxicity from narcotic effect levels of organic compounds in the acute daphnid assay.

Quantitative and qualitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) have a great potential to support the risk assessment of chemicals, provided there are tools available that allow evaluation of the suitability of QSARs for the compounds of interest. In this context, a pragmatic approach is to discriminate excess toxicity from narcotic effect levels, because the latter can be estimated from QSARs and thus have a low priority for experimental testing. To develop a respective scheme for the acute daphnid toxicity as one of the primary ecotoxicological endpoints, 1067 acute toxicity data entries for 380 chemicals involving the daphnid species Daphnia magna were taken from the on-line literature, and quality checks such as water solubility were employed to eliminate apparently odd data entries. For 36 known narcotics with LC50 values referring to D. magna, a reference baseline QSAR is derived. Compounds with LC50 values above a certain threshold defined relative to their predicted baseline toxicity are classified as exerting excess toxicity. Three simple discrimination schemes are presented that enable the identification of excess toxicity from structural alerts based on the presence or absence of certain heteroatoms and their chemical functionality. Moreover, a two-step classification approach is introduced that enables a prioritization of organic compounds with respect to their need for experimental testing. The discussion includes reaction mechanisms that may explain the association of structural alerts with excess toxicity, a comparison with predictions derived from mode of action-based classification schemes, and a statistical analysis of the discrimination performance in terms of detailed contingency table statistics.

[1]  S. Bradbury,et al.  Hepatic microsomal N-hydroxylation of aniline and 4-chloroaniline by rainbow trout (Onchorhyncus mykiss). , 1991, Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems.

[2]  Interspecies sensitivity in the aquatic toxicity of aromatic amines. , 2002, Environmental toxicology and pharmacology.

[3]  Weida Tong,et al.  Study of 202 natural, synthetic, and environmental chemicals for binding to the androgen receptor. , 2003, Chemical research in toxicology.

[4]  Gerald T Ankley,et al.  Overview of data and conceptual approaches for derivation of quantitative structure‐activity relationships for ecotoxicological effects of organic chemicals , 2003, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[5]  R. L. Lipnick.  Base-line toxicity predicted by quantitative structure-activity relationships as a probe for molecular mechanism of toxicity , 1989 .

[6]  R. Altenburger,et al.  Mixture toxicity and its modeling by quantitative structure‐activity relationships , 2003, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[7]  C L Russom,et al.  ASTER: an integration of the AQUIRE data base and the QSAR system for use in ecological risk assessments. , 1991, The Science of the total environment.

[8]  Betts Ks.  Chemical industry pressured to test high-production volume chemicals. , 1998 .

[9]  P C Jurs,et al.  Linear regression and computational neural network prediction of tetrahymena acute toxicity for aromatic compounds from molecular structure. , 2001, Chemical research in toxicology.

[10]  Gilman D. Veith,et al.  Structure-Toxicity Relationships for Industrial Chemicals Causing Type (II) Narcosis Syndrome , 1987 .

[11]  J. Hermens,et al.  Electrophiles and acute toxicity to fish. , 1990, Environmental health perspectives.

[12]  K. Yin,et al.  Development of QSARs for predicting the joint effects between cyanogenic toxicants and aldehydes. , 2003, Chemical research in toxicology.

[13]  Robert M. Bruce,et al.  Assessment of the Oral Rat Chronic Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level Model in TOPKAT, a QSAR Software Package for Toxicity Prediction , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[14]  J. Hermens,et al.  Classifying environmental pollutants , 1992 .

[15]  Tom Aldenberg,et al.  Application of QSARs, extrapolation and equilibrium partitioning in aquatic effects assessment. I. Narcotic industrial pollutants , 1992 .

[16]  Rolf Altenburger,et al.  Quantitative structure-activity analysis of the algae toxicity of nitroaromatic compounds. , 2000, Chemical research in toxicology.

[17]  Ernesto Estrada,et al.  Computer-aided knowledge generation for understanding skin sensitization mechanisms: the TOPS-MODE approach. , 2003, Chemical research in toxicology.

[18]  D. Tyrawska,et al.  Daphnia magna ecotoxicity test with parathion , 1998 .

[19]  R. Erickson,et al.  Toxicokinetics and metabolism of aniline and 4-chloroaniline in medaka (Oryzias latipes). , 1993, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[20]  Masatoshi Morita,et al.  Structure-activity relationships for the toxicity of polychlorinated dibenzofurans: approach through density functional theory-based descriptors. , 2004, Chemical research in toxicology.

[21]  C. D. S. Tomlin,et al.  The Pesticide Manual , 2003 .

[22]  J. Timbrell.  Principles of biochemical toxicology , 1991 .

[23]  H. Könemann.  Quantitative structure-activity relationships in fish toxicity studies. Part 1: relationship for 50 industrial pollutants. , 1981, Toxicology.

[24]  Ralph Kühne,et al.  Stepwise discrimination between four modes of toxic action of phenols in the Tetrahymena pyriformis assay. , 2003, Chemical research in toxicology.

[25]  John D. Walker,et al.  Quantitative structure‐activity relationships for predicting potential ecological hazard of organic chemicals for use in regulatory risk assessments , 2003, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[26]  Mark T. D. Cronin,et al.  Modeling Discrimination between Antibacterial and Non‐Antibacterial Activity based on 3D Molecular Descriptors , 2003 .

[27]  Vijay K. Gombar,et al.  Use of Predictive Toxicology in the Design of New Chemicals , 1995 .

[28]  Roger L Breton,et al.  A comparison of model performance for six quantitative structure‐activity relationship packages that predict acute toxicity to fish , 2003, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[29]  C. Russom,et al.  Predicting modes of toxic action from chemical structure: Acute toxicity in the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) , 1997 .

[30]  R. Lipnick,et al.  A QSAR study of the acute toxicity of some industrial organic chemicals to goldfish. Narcosis, electrophile and proelectrophile mechanisms. , 1987, Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems.

[31]  John D. Walker,et al.  An overview of the use of quantitative structure‐activity relationships for ranking and prioritizing large chemical inventories for environmental risk assessments , 2003, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.