Abstract The term “geoelectric null-array” is used for direct current electrode configurations yielding a potential difference of zero above a homogeneous half-space. This paper presents a comparative study of the behaviour of three null-arrays, midpoint null-array (MAN), Wenner-γ null-array and Schlumberger null-array in response to a fracture, both in profiling and in azimuthal mode. The main objective is to determine which array(s) best localise fractures or best identify their orientation. Forward modelling of the three null-arrays revealed that the Wenner-γ and Schlumberger null-arrays localise vertical fractures the most accurately, whilst the midpoint null-array combined with the Schlumberger null-array allows accurate orientation of a fracture. Numerical analysis then served as a basis to interpret the field results. Field test measurements were carried out above a quarry in Les Breuleux (Switzerland) with the three null-arrays and classical arrays. The results were cross-validated with quarry-wall geological mapping. In real field circumstances, the Wenner-γ null-array proved to be the most efficient and accurate in localising fractures. The orientations of the fractures according to the numerical results were most efficiently determined with the midpoint null-array, whilst the Schlumberger null-array adds accuracy to the results. This study shows that geoelectrical null-arrays are more suitable than classical arrays for the characterisation of fracture geometry.
[1]
L. Goddard.
Linear Differential Operators
,
1962,
Nature.
[2]
S. Szalai,et al.
Classification of surface geoelectric arrays
,
2007
.
[3]
P. Turberg,et al.
Geoelectric mapping of near-surface karstic fractures by using null arrays
,
2002
.
[4]
László Szarka,et al.
On the classification of surface geoelectric arrays
,
2008
.
[5]
George V. Keller,et al.
Electrical Methods in Geophysical Prospecting
,
1981
.
[6]
K. Cook,et al.
Interpretation of resistivity data
,
1966
.
[7]
Sándor Szalai,et al.
Expanding the possibilities of two-dimensional multielectrode systems, with consideration to earlier geoelectric arrays
,
2011
.
[8]
A. Apparao,et al.
Depth Of Investigation In Direct Current Methods
,
1971
.
[9]
Robert L. Parker,et al.
The inverse problem of resistivity sounding
,
1984
.
[10]
S. Szalai,et al.
Parameter sensitivity maps of surface geoelectric arrays I. Linear arrays
,
2008
.
[11]
L. S. Edwards,et al.
A modified pseudosection for resistivity and IP
,
1977
.
[12]
S. Szalai,et al.
Parameter sensitivity maps of surface geoelectric arrays
,
2006
.
[13]
Robert W. Taylor,et al.
Characterizing Jointed Systems by Azimuthal Resistivity Surveys
,
1988
.
[14]
M. Loke.
Tutorial : 2-D and 3-D electrical imaging surveys
,
2001
.