Affordances Are Enough: Reply to Chemero et al. (2003)

Chemero, Klein, and Cordeiro (this issue) present an argument about the utility of a concept of events within the ecological approach to perception and action. They define ecological events as changes in the layout of affordances, and they distinguish this concept from earlier definitions of event, which they refer to as physical events. They argue that changes in the layout of affordances should be perceived, that is, that their perception is motivated by the ecological approach to perception and action. They also argue that changes in the layout of affordances are perceived, and they offer an experiment that supports the hypothesis that humans are sensitive to changes in the layout of affordances. What they do not do, I argue, is offer any compelling reason why event should be applied to changes in the layout of affordances. I also argue that changes in the layout of affordances do not have a special ontological status that might merit a unique name or constitute a category of perceivables that is logically distinct from affordances.

[1]  Thomas A. Stoffregen,et al.  Affordances and Events: Theory and Research , 2000 .

[2]  Thomas A. Stoffregen,et al.  Affordances and Events , 2000 .

[3]  A. Chemero.  What Events Are , 2000 .

[4]  James A. Balliett,et al.  What an actor must do in order to perceive the affordance for sitting. , 1990 .

[5]  Oded M. Flascher,et al.  Dimensions of Event Perception , 1996 .

[6]  Are Events and Affordances Commensurate Terms? , 2000 .

[7]  K. J. Vicente,et al.  The Ecology of Human-Machine Systems II: Mediating 'Direct Perception' in Complex Work Domains , 1990 .

[8]  G P Bingham,et al.  Dynamics and the orientation of kinematic forms in visual event recognition. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Geoffrey P. Bingham,et al.  Events (Like Objects) Are Things, Can Have Affordance Properties, and Can Be Perceived , 2000 .

[10]  L S Mark,et al.  Postural dynamics and the preferred critical boundary for visually guided reaching. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  W H Warren,et al.  Perceiving affordances: visual guidance of stair climbing. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  T. Stoffregen,et al.  Perceiving affordances for another person's actions. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  F. C. Bakker,et al.  The relevance of action in perceiving affordances: perception of catchableness of fly balls. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  John B. Pittenger,et al.  Detection of Violations of the Law of Pendulum Motion: Observers' Sensitivity to the Relation Between Period and Length , 1990 .

[15]  A. Chemero,et al.  Events as Changes in the Layout of Affordances , 2003 .

[16]  Geoffrey P. Bingham,et al.  Scaling Judgments of Lifted Weight: Lifter Size and the Role of the Standard , 1993 .

[17]  L. S. Mark,et al.  Eyeheight-scaled information about affordances: a study of sitting and stair climbing. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.