ThE PSyChOlOgy Of glOBAl WARMINg Improving the Fit between the Science and the Message

The evidence in support of global warming and the lack of significant published evidence to the contrary provides an extraordinarily strong foundation for the scientif ic community's call for action on greenhouse gas emissions. However, public conviction about the threat posed by global warming appears to be on the decline. What can the scientific community do to communicate the message that global warming requires urgent action now, most likely via deep cuts in emissions? A clear impediment to this goal is that the issues are complex and the outcomes uncertain. As a step towards achieving this goal, the authors review some psychological phenomena that illuminate how humans make judgments and decisions when faced with complex uncertain problems. The authors suggest that an awareness of this research, combined with an indication of how lessons from it can be applied to the particular communication issues faced by climate scientists, could help in ensuring that the message of global warming is heard and heeded.

[1]  I. Janis.  Victims of Groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. By Irving L. Janis. (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1972. viii + 276 pp. Map, illustrations, chart, notes, sources, bibliography, and index. Cloth, $7.95; paper $4.50.) , 1973 .

[2]  A. Tversky,et al.  Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty , 1992 .

[3]  P. Stern.  Psychological dimensions of global environmental change. , 1992 .

[4]  A. Leiserowitz.  Climate Change Risk Perception and Policy Preferences: The Role of Affect, Imagery, and Values , 2006 .

[5]  Baruch Fischhoff.  Hot Air : . The Psychology of C 02-Induced Climatic Change , 2004 .

[6]  H. Damon Matthews,et al.  The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions , 2009, Nature.

[7]  Neville Nicholls,et al.  Cognitive Illusions, Heuristics, and Climate Prediction , 1999 .

[8]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[9]  Ramon J. Aldag,et al.  Organizational Tonypandy: Lessons from a Quarter Century of the Groupthink Phenomenon. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[10]  N. Kerr,et al.  Group performance and decision making. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[11]  N. Meinshausen,et al.  Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 °C , 2009, Nature.

[12]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. , 2002 .

[13]  S. Schneider,et al.  Climate Change 2007 Synthesis report , 2008 .

[14]  Michael F. Wehner,et al.  Is the climate warming or cooling? , 2009 .

[15]  J. Sterman.  Risk Communication on Climate: Mental Models and Mass Balance , 2008, Science.

[16]  P. Wason.  On the Failure to Eliminate Hypotheses in a Conceptual Task , 1960 .

[17]  B. Johnson.  Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach , 2002 .

[18]  Nigel Harvey,et al.  Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making , 2004 .

[19]  Jim W Hall,et al.  Imprecise probability assessment of tipping points in the climate system , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  J. Klayman,et al.  Confirmation, Disconfirmation, and Informa-tion in Hypothesis Testing , 1987 .

[21]  K. Fiedler.  Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to judgment biases. , 2000, Psychological review.

[22]  E. Weber.  Experience-Based and Description-Based Perceptions of Long-Term Risk: Why Global Warming does not Scare us (Yet) , 2006 .

[23]  K Fiedler.  Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to judgment biases. , 2000, Psychological review.

[24]  David J. Hardisty,et al.  Discounting future green: money versus the environment. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[25]  Kimihiko Yamagishi.  When a 12.86% Mortality is More Dangerous than 24.14%: Implications for Risk Communication , 1997 .

[26]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[27]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[28]  J. Klayman.  Varieties of Confirmation Bias , 1995 .

[29]  B. Newell,et al.  Getting scarred and winning lotteries: effects of exemplar cuing and statistical format on imagining low‐probability events , 2008 .

[30]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[31]  L. Furby,et al.  Psychological Dimensions of Climatic Change , 1983 .

[32]  Lukas H. Meyer,et al.  Summary for Policymakers , 2022, The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate.

[33]  Mark Snyder,et al.  Cognition, social behavior, and the environment , 1983 .

[34]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  How to Improve Bayesian Reasoning Without Instruction: Frequency Formats , 1995 .

[35]  David V. Budescu,et al.  Improving Communication of Uncertainty in the Reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2009, Psychological science.

[36]  Panel Intergubernamental sobre Cambio Climático.  Climate change 2007: Synthesis report , 2007 .

[37]  J. Sterman,et al.  Understanding public complacency about climate change: adults’ mental models of climate change violate conservation of matter , 2007 .

[38]  Craig R. M. McKenzie.  Hypothesis Testing and Evaluation , 2008 .

[39]  P. Slovic,et al.  Violence Risk Assessment and Risk Communication: The Effects of Using Actual Cases, Providing Instruction, and Employing Probability Versus Frequency Formats , 2000, Law and human behavior.

[40]  F. Strack,et al.  Explaining the Enigmatic Anchoring Effect: Mechanisms of Selective Accessibility , 1997 .

[41]  R. Dawes,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: Clinical versus Actuarial Judgment , 2002 .

[42]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Nonpersuasive communication about matters of greatest urgency: climate change. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[43]  Jan Corfee-Morlot,et al.  Assessing dangerous climate change through an update of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) “reasons for concern” , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Temporal construal. , 2003, Psychological review.

[45]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Risk as Feelings , 2001, Psychological bulletin.