Adaptation characteristics of steady-state motion visual evoked potentials

OBJECTIVE Motion visual evoked potentials (motion VEPs) are used in clinical diagnosis and basic research. Employing steady-state rather than the usual transient motion VEPs simplifies statistical evaluation and might drastically reduce examination durations. Protocols for recording transient motion-onset VEPs usually involve fairly long recovery intervals between trials to avoid neural adaptation. This is not feasible for steady-state VEPs. We investigated how adaptation affects the steady-state motion VEP. METHODS Oscillatory (13.3rev/s) and continuous uni-directional random-dot motion served as adaptation stimuli. Steady-state motion VEPs and, for comparison, transient motion VEPs were recorded. RESULTS In the first experiment, we investigated how adaptation affects the recordings. Contrary to our expectation, we did not find any sizable effect. However, there was a large inter-individual variability in steady-state amplitude and no correlation across subjects between transient and steady-state amplitude. In the second experiment, we confirmed that the steady-state VEP reflects veridical motion processing by assessing its susceptibility to uni-directional pre-adaptation. CONCLUSIONS Taken together, the results suggest that steady-state motion VEPs provide a fast method of recording motion responses without suffering from adaptation, but at the expense of inter-individual reproducibility.

[1]  P. Clarke,et al.  Are visual evoked potentials to motion-reversal produced by direction-sensitive brain mechanisms? , 1974, Vision research.

[2]  W. Spileers,et al.  Visually evoked potentials evoked by moving unidimensional noise stimuli: Effects of contrast, spatial frequency, active electrode location, reference electrode location, and stimulus type , 1998, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[3]  Sven P. Heinrich,et al.  Adaptation dynamics in pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials , 2001, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[4]  Neal S. Peachey,et al.  Short-term changes in the response characteristics of the human visual evoked potential , 1994, Vision Research.

[5]  Michael Bach,et al.  Time course of motion adaptation: Motion-onset visual evoked potentials and subjective estimates , 1999, Vision Research.

[6]  Maninder K. Kahlon,et al.  Visual Motion Analysis for Pursuit Eye Movements in Area MT of Macaque Monkeys , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Visuell evozierte Potentiale bei Musterbewegung , 1983 .

[8]  M. A. Berkley,et al.  Evoked potential estimates of the time course of adaptation and recovery to counterphase gratings , 1988, Vision Research.

[9]  M. Bach,et al.  On the statistical significance of electrophysiological steady-state responses , 2004, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[10]  Michael Bach,et al.  Directional tuning of human motion adaptation as reflected by the motion VEP , 2001, Vision Research.

[11]  John J. Sloper,et al.  Electrophysiological assessment of magnocellular and parvocellular function in early and late onset strabismic amblyopes. , 2001 .

[12]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Is the motion system relatively spared in amblyopia? Evidence from cortical evoked responses , 1996, Vision Research.

[13]  Michael Bach,et al.  Motion adaptation governs the shape of motion-evoked cortical potentials , 1994, Vision Research.

[14]  J. Movshon,et al.  The Timing of Response Onset and Offset in Macaque Visual Neurons , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  J. Victor,et al.  A new statistic for steady-state evoked potentials. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  B W van Dijk,et al.  Motion-onset visual-evoked potentials as a function of retinal eccentricity in man. , 1993, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[17]  M. Bach,et al.  Asymmetry of motion VEP in infantile strabismus and in central vestibular nystagmus , 2005, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[18]  M. Kuba,et al.  Clinical application of motion-onset visual evoked potentials , 2004, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[19]  C. Tyler,et al.  Movement adaptation in the visual evoked response , 1977, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  Oscillatory motion but not pattern reversal elicits monocular motion VEP biases in infantile esotropia , 1999, Vision Research.

[21]  Isolation and characteristics of a steady-state visually-evoked potential in humans related to the motion of a stimulus , 1995, Vision Research.

[22]  Mark J. Kupersmith,et al.  Visual evoked potentials following abrupt contrast changes , 1994, Vision Research.

[23]  M. Bach,et al.  Do's and don'ts in Fourier analysis of steady-state potentials , 2004, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[24]  Anthony M. Norcia,et al.  Measurement of spatial contrast sensitivity with the swept contrast VEP , 1989, Vision Research.

[25]  Michael Bach,et al.  Isolating motion responses in visual evoked potentials by preadapting flicker-sensitive mechanisms , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.