A nonlinear PDE formulation for offshore vessel pipeline installation

Abstract In this paper a nonlinear dynamic PDE formulation for a pipe string suspended from a pipelay vessel to the seabed in a pipelay operation is developed. This model extends a three-dimensional beam model capable of undergoing finite extension, shearing, twist and bending, to apply for marine applications by adding the effects of restoring forces, hydrodynamic drag and seabed interaction. The model is validated against the natural catenary equation and the FEM code RIFLEX. The model is extended to include the pipelay vessel dynamics by applying a potential theory formulation of a surface vessel, suited for dynamic positioning and low speed maneuvering, as a boundary condition for the PDE. This system is found to be input–output passive and stable. Pipeline installation applications where the presented model is suited are e.g., analysis and simulation of the installation operation, operability analysis, hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) testing for vessel control systems, and automation of the pipelay operation.

[1]  R. Plunkett.  Static Bending Stresses in Catenaries and Drill Strings , 1967 .

[2]  Morten Breivik,et al.  Offshore Pipelay Operations From a Control Perspective , 2009 .

[3]  L. Siciliano.  Modelling and Control of Robot Manipulators , 2000 .

[4]  Odd M. Faltinsen,et al.  Sea loads on ships and offshore structures , 1990 .

[5]  E. Reissner.  Some remarks on the problem of column buckling , 1982 .

[6]  E. Hairer,et al.  Geometric Numerical Integration , 2022, Oberwolfach Reports.

[7]  E. P. Heerema.  Recent Achievements and Present Trends in Deepwater Pipe-Lay Systems , 2005 .

[8]  M W Braestrup,et al.  Design and Installation of Marine Pipelines , 2005 .

[9]  P. Betsch,et al.  Frame‐indifferent beam finite elements based upon the geometrically exact beam theory , 2002 .

[10]  A. Palmer,et al.  Subsea Pipeline Engineering , 2004 .

[11]  M. Balas.  Active control of flexible systems , 1978 .

[12]  D. R. Rutledge,et al.  Stiffened Catenary Calculations in Pipeline Laying Problem , 1968 .

[13]  J. C. Simo,et al.  A three-dimensional finite-strain rod model. Part II: Computational aspects , 1986 .

[14]  Jan Tommy Gravdahl,et al.  Modeling and simulation for automatic control , 2002 .

[15]  Thor I. Fossen,et al.  Modeling and Control of Offshore Pipelay Operations Based on a Finite Strain Pipe Model , 2009, 2009 American Control Conference.

[16]  Tristan Perez,et al.  Kinematic Models for Manoeuvring and Seakeeping of Marine Vessels , 2007 .

[17]  Karl Johan Åström,et al.  Automatic Control: A Perspective , 1996 .

[18]  Joan Lasenby,et al.  Simo-Vu Quoc rods using Clifford algebra , 1999 .

[19]  J. C. Simo,et al.  Non-linear dynamics of three-dimensional rods: Exact energy and momentum conserving algorithms , 1995 .

[20]  W. G. Bickley.  Mathematical Theory Of Elasticity , 1946, Nature.

[21]  J. C. Simo,et al.  A finite strain beam formulation. The three-dimensional dynamic problem. Part I , 1985 .

[22]  丸尾 孟.  1. F.Ogilvie (D.T.M.B.), Recent Progress Toward the Understanding and Prediction of Ship Motions , 1965 .

[23]  Niklas Säfström,et al.  Modeling and simulation of rigid body and rod dynamics via geometric methods , 2009 .

[24]  Thor I. Fossen,et al.  Marine Control Systems Guidance, Navigation, and Control of Ships, Rigs and Underwater Vehicles , 2002 .

[25]  Thor I. Fossen,et al.  Nonlinear Time-Domain Strip Theory Formulation for Low-Speed Manoeuvring and Station-Keeping , 2004 .

[26]  J. R. Morison,et al.  The Force Exerted by Surface Waves on Piles , 1950 .

[27]  A. Love,et al.  The Mathematical Theory of Elasticity. , 1928 .

[28]  J. C. Simo,et al.  On the dynamics of finite-strain rods undergoing large motions a geometrically exact approach , 1988 .

[29]  Ignacio Romero,et al.  An objective finite element approximation of the kinematics of geometrically exact rods and its use in the formulation of an energy–momentum conserving scheme in dynamics , 2002 .