Effect of neighbourhood income and maternal education on birth outcomes: a population-based study

Background: Maternal socioeconomic status (SES) is an important determinant of inequity in maternal and fetal health. We sought to determine the extent to which associations between adverse birth outcomes and SES can be identified using individual-level measures (maternal level of education) and community-level measures (neighbourhood income). Methods: In Quebec, the birth registration form includes a field for the mother's years of education. Using data from birth registration certificates, we identified all births from 1991 to 2000. Using maternal postal codes that can be linked to census enumeration areas, we determined neighbourhood income levels that reflect SES. Results: Lower levels of both maternal education and neighbourhood income were associated with elevated crude risks of preterm birth, small-for-gestational-age (SGA) birth, stillbirth and neonatal and postneonatal death. The effects of maternal education were stronger than, and independent of, those of neighbourhood income. Compared with women in the highest neighbourhood income quintile, women in the lowest quintile were significantly more likely to have a preterm birth (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10–1.17), SGA birth (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.15–1.21) or stillbirth (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.13–1.48); compared with mothers who had completed community college or at least some university, mothers who had not completed high school were significantly more likely to have a preterm birth (adjusted OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.44–1.52), SGA birth (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.82–1.91) or stillbirth (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.36–1.74). Interpretation: Individual and, to a lesser extent, neighbourhood-level SES measures are independent indicators for subpopulations at risk of adverse birth outcomes. Women with lower education levels and those living in poorer neighbourhoods are more vulnerable to adverse birth outcomes and may benefit from heightened clinical vigilance and counselling.

[1]  S V Subramanian,et al.  Race/ethnicity, gender, and monitoring socioeconomic gradients in health: a comparison of area-based socioeconomic measures--the public health disparities geocoding project. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[2]  L. Hirsch.  Competing interests: none declared. , 2006 .

[3]  N. Krieger,et al.  Can we monitor socioeconomic inequalities in health? A survey of U.S. health departments' data collection and reporting practices. , 1997, Public health reports.

[4]  J. Berthelot,et al.  Trends in mortality by neighbourhood income in urban Canada from 1971 to 1996 , 2002 .

[5]  S. Fortmann,et al.  Socioeconomic status and health: how education, income, and occupation contribute to risk factors for cardiovascular disease. , 1992, American journal of public health.

[6]  Z. Bhutta,et al.  Community-Based Interventions for Improving Perinatal and Neonatal Health Outcomes in Developing Countries: A Review of the Evidence , 2005, Pediatrics.

[7]  R. Cohen,et al.  Income inequality and mortality in metropolitan areas of the United States. , 1998, American journal of public health.

[8]  Russell Wilkins,et al.  Disparities in Birth Outcomes by Neighborhood Income: Temporal Trends in Rural and Urban Areas, British Columbia , 2004, Epidemiology.

[9]  B. Mccarthy,et al.  International Collaborative Effort (ICE) On Birth Weight, Plurality, Perinatal, And Infant Mortality , 1989, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[10]  P. Braveman,et al.  The relationship of neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics to birthweight among 5 ethnic groups in California. , 2001, American journal of public health.

[11]  Jarvis T. Chen,et al.  Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter?: the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. , 2002, American journal of epidemiology.

[12]  Mei-Cheng Wang,et al.  Neighborhood risk factors for low birthweight in Baltimore: a multilevel analysis. , 1997, American journal of public health.

[13]  A C Allen,et al.  An assessment of the validity of a computer system for probabilistic record linkage of birth and infant death records in Canada. The Fetal and Infant Health Study Group. , 2000, Chronic diseases in Canada.

[14]  T. Joyce,et al.  Changes in prenatal care timing and low birth weight by race and socioeconomic status: implications for the Medicaid expansions for pregnant women. , 2001, Health services research.

[15]  Jarvis T. Chen,et al.  Choosing area based socioeconomic measures to monitor social inequalities in low birth weight and childhood lead poisoning: The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project (US) , 2003, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[16]  S. Selvin,et al.  Neighborhood socioeconomic status, maternal race and preterm delivery: a case-control study. , 2002, Annals of epidemiology.

[17]  J. Chen,et al.  Maternal education and fetal and infant mortality in Quebec. Fetal and Infant Mortality Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. , 1998, Health reports.

[18]  Aap Task Force on Infant Positioning and Sids.  Positioning and SIDS , 1992, Pediatrics.

[19]  R W Platt,et al.  A new and improved population-based Canadian reference for birth weight for gestational age. , 2001, Pediatrics.

[20]  J R Dunn,et al.  Relation between income inequality and mortality in Canada and in the United States: cross sectional assessment using census data and vital statistics , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  Trivellore Raghunathan,et al.  Income inequality, the psychosocial environment, and health: comparisons of wealthy nations , 2001, The Lancet.

[22]  M. Kramer,et al.  Risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes among Inuit and North American Indian women in Quebec, 1985-97. , 2004, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.