Identifying wildlife corridors for the restoration of regional habitat connectivity: A multispecies approach and comparison of resistance surfaces

Many large-scale connectivity initiatives have been proposed around the world with the aim of maintaining or restoring connectivity to offset the impacts on biodiversity of habitat loss and fragmentation. Frequently, these are based on the requirements of a single focal species of concern, but there is growing attention to identifying connectivity requirements for multi-species assemblages. A number of methods for modelling connectivity have been developed; likewise, different approaches have been used to construct resistance surfaces, the basic input data for connectivity analyses. In this study we modelled connectivity for a multi-species group of vertebrates representative of heavily fragmented forests in north-central Victoria, Australia. For each species, we used least-cost modelling and compared two alternate resistance surfaces, based on species distribution models and on expert opinion, respectively. We integrated the connectivity results across individual species to obtain a multi-species connectivity map for the region. A resistance surface based on expert assessment of the relative use of land-cover classes by the target species was more informative than one based on species distribution models. The former resulted in pathways more strongly aligned with existing patches and strips of native vegetation. In this region, pathways aligned with streams and their associated riparian vegetation have relatively high ecological potential and feasibility to contribute to regional connectivity for the assemblage of forest vertebrates.

[1]  Tabitha A. Graves,et al.  Identification of functional corridors with movement characteristics of brown bears on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[2]  Viral B. Shah,et al.  Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. , 2008, Ecology.

[3]  Jesse Whittington,et al.  Response of Wolves to Corridor Restoration and Human Use Management , 2006 .

[4]  Paul Beier,et al.  Forks in the Road: Choices in Procedures for Designing Wildland Linkages , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[5]  Falk Huettmann,et al.  Spatial complexity, informatics, and wildlife conservation , 2010 .

[6]  M. Whitea,et al.  Species distribution modelling for conservation planning in Victoria of Australia , 2011 .

[7]  James Q. Radford,et al.  Gap‐crossing decisions of forest birds in a fragmented landscape , 2009 .

[8]  A. Bennett,et al.  Woodland remnants along roadsides: a reflection of pre-European structure in temperate woodlands? , 2001 .

[9]  Samuel A. Cushman,et al.  Multispecies assessment of core areas and connectivity of desert carnivores in central Iran , 2018 .

[10]  Bob Speirs.  Linking Australia's landscapes: lessons and opportunities from large-scale conservation networks , 2013 .

[11]  Corridor connecting giant panda habitats from north to south in the Min Mountains, Sichuan, China. , 2006, Integrative zoology.

[12]  R. L. Harrison.  Toward a Theory of Inter-Refuge Corridor Design , 1992 .

[13]  Sheng Li,et al.  Does one size fit all? A multispecies approach to regional landscape corridor planning , 2018 .

[14]  Andrew F. Bennett,et al.  Landscape-level thresholds of habitat cover for woodland-dependent birds , 2005 .

[15]  R. Hijmans,et al.  Meta‐corridor solutions for climate‐vulnerable plant species groups in South Korea , 2017 .

[16]  Jean-Michel Roberge,et al.  Usefulness of the Umbrella Species Concept as a Conservation Tool , 2004 .

[17]  Mark Hebblewhite,et al.  Evaluating multispecies landscape connectivity in a threatened tropical mammal community , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[18]  F. Osborn,et al.  Linking two elephant refuges with a corridor in the communal lands of Zimbabwe , 2003 .

[19]  S. Cushman,et al.  Conserving threatened riparian ecosystems in the American West: Precipitation gradients and river networks drive genetic connectivity and diversity in a foundation riparian tree (Populus angustifolia) , 2017, Molecular ecology.

[20]  Timothy H. Keitt,et al.  LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY: A GRAPH‐THEORETIC PERSPECTIVE , 2001 .

[21]  D. Nimmo,et al.  Riparian vegetation has disproportionate benefits for landscape-scale conservation of woodland birds in highly modified environments , 2014 .

[22]  K. DeMatteo,et al.  Using niche-modelling and species-specific cost analyses to determine a multispecies corridor in a fragmented landscape , 2017, PloS one.

[23]  A. Bennett,et al.  Home-range use by the brush-tailed phascogale (Phascogale tapoatafa) (Marsupialia) in high-quality, spatially limited habitat , 2001 .

[24]  Samuel A. Cushman,et al.  Multi-taxa population connectivity in the Northern Rocky Mountains , 2012 .

[25]  A. Bennett,et al.  Regional faunal decline – reptile occurrence in fragmented rural landscapes of south-eastern Australia , 2008 .

[26]  A. Etter,et al.  Habitat connectivity in biodiversity conservation , 2016 .

[27]  Brad H McRae,et al.  Identifying Corridors among Large Protected Areas in the United States , 2016, PloS one.

[28]  Paul Beier,et al.  Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  A Resistant‐Kernel Model of Connectivity for Amphibians that Breed in Vernal Pools , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[30]  F. Marucco.  DISTRIBUTION, HABITAT SUITABILITY, AND CONNECTIVITY OF WOLVES (CANIS LUPUS) IN THE ALPS Workpackage 5: "Corridors and Barriers" , 2011 .

[31]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review , 2012, Landscape Ecology.

[32]  S. Cushman,et al.  Use of Empirically Derived Source‐Destination Models to Map Regional Conservation Corridors , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[33]  Paul Beier,et al.  Toward Best Practices for Developing Regional Connectivity Maps , 2011, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[34]  Ian D Clark,et al.  Box-Ironbark: Forests and Woodlands Investigation Resources and Issues Report , 1997 .

[35]  M. White,et al.  Predicting Landscape-Genetic Consequences of Habitat Loss, Fragmentation and Mobility for Multiple Species of Woodland Birds , 2012, PloS one.

[36]  J. Fitzsimons,et al.  Linking Australia's landscapes: lessons and opportunities from large-scale conservation networks. , 2013 .

[37]  D. Theobald,et al.  Connecting natural landscapes using a landscape permeability model to prioritize conservation activities in the United States , 2012 .

[38]  Per Sandström,et al.  Identification and Management of Linkage Zones for Grizzly Bears between the Large Blocks of Public Land in the Northern Rocky Mountains , 2001 .

[39]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Key topics in conservation biology 2 , 2013 .

[40]  Peter H. Singleton,et al.  Focal species and landscape “naturalness” corridor models offer complementary approaches for connectivity conservation planning , 2015, Landscape Ecology.

[41]  Claire A. Montgomery,et al.  Trade‐offs and efficiencies in optimal budget‐constrained multispecies corridor networks , 2017, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[42]  Minzhou Zhong,et al.  Integrating priority areas and ecological corridors into national network for conservation planning in China. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[43]  Erin L. Koen,et al.  Landscape connectivity for wildlife: development and validation of multispecies linkage maps , 2014 .

[44]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure , 1993 .

[45]  Graeme Newell,et al.  Species distribution modelling for conservation planning in Victoria, Australia , 2013 .

[46]  Paul Beier,et al.  Biological corridors and connectivity , 2013 .

[47]  Yibo Hu,et al.  Quantifying landscape linkages among giant panda subpopulations in regional scale conservation. , 2012, Integrative zoology.

[48]  D. Magness,et al.  Using topographic geodiversity to connect conservation lands in the Central Yukon, Alaska , 2018, Landscape Ecology.

[49]  Samuel A. Cushman,et al.  Mapping Landscape Resistance to Identify Corridors and Barriers for Elephant Movement in Southern Africa , 2010 .

[50]  Carlos Carroll,et al.  Use of Linkage Mapping and Centrality Analysis Across Habitat Gradients to Conserve Connectivity of Gray Wolf Populations in Western North America , 2012, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[51]  N. Haddad.  Corridor Use Predicted from Behaviors at Habitat Boundaries , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[52]  C. Wyborn.  Landscape Scale Ecological Connectivity: Australian Survey and Rehearsals , 2011 .

[53]  Justin S. Brashares,et al.  Placing linkages among fragmented habitats: do least‐cost models reflect how animals use landscapes? , 2011 .

[54]  A. Bennett.  Linkages in the Landscape: The Role Of Corridors And Connectivity In Wildlife Conservation , 1999 .

[55]  Jeff Bowman,et al.  Multi-species genetic connectivity in a terrestrial habitat network , 2017, Movement ecology.

[56]  Paul Beier,et al.  Determining Minimum Habitat Areas and Habitat Corridors for Cougars , 1993 .

[57]  Mark S. Boyce,et al.  Use of resource selection functions to identify conservation corridors , 2009 .

[58]  Paul Beier,et al.  The Role of Landscape Connectivity in Planning and Implementing Conservation and Restoration Priorities. Issues in Ecology , 2012 .

[59]  D. Ackerly,et al.  New concepts, models, and assessments of climate-wise connectivity , 2018, Environmental Research Letters.

[60]  E. Zavaleta,et al.  Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: A review of 22 years of recommendations , 2009 .

[61]  Robert S Schick,et al.  Graph models of habitat mosaics. , 2009, Ecology letters.