Interaction between a content provider and a service provider and its efficiency

We study the interaction between a service provider (SP) and a content provider (CP) when the SP can provide higher quality-of-service (QoS) to content service under a private agreement with the CP. We model the interaction between the providers both as a Stackelberg game and as a two-person bargaining problem in order to understand how the relative bargaining power of these providers affects the resulting QoS and social efficiency. Our findings suggest that the social efficiency is identical under both the two-person bargaining problem model and the Stackelberg game model regardless of which provider is the leader with a stronger bargaining position. In addition, we prove that, under a mild technical condition, the QoS at Nash equilibrium and Nash bargaining solution improves as the contract duration increases.

[1]  M. Dufwenberg Game theory. , 2011, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[2]  Lukas Wiewiorra,et al.  Network Neutrality and Congestion Sensitive Content Providers: Implications for Content Variety, Broadband Investment and Regulation , 2012 .

[3]  Eugene F. Brigham,et al.  Intermediate Financial Management , 1977 .

[4]  Dan Wang,et al.  Sponsoring content: Motivation and pitfalls for content service providers , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS).

[5]  D. Fudenberg,et al.  The Theory of Learning in Games , 1998 .

[6]  J. Nash THE BARGAINING PROBLEM , 1950, Classics in Game Theory.

[7]  Qiong Wang,et al.  Economic models of sponsored content in wireless networks with uncertain demand , 2013, 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS).

[8]  J. Choi,et al.  Net Neutrality and Investment Incentives , 2008, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[9]  W. Rudin Principles of mathematical analysis , 1964 .

[10]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  Worst-case equilibria , 1999 .

[11]  Hong Guo,et al.  The Debate on Net Neutrality: A Policy Perspective , 2008, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  T. Mulgan The Contract Theory , 2006 .

[13]  J. Laffont,et al.  The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model , 2001 .

[14]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Nonlinear Programming , 1997 .

[15]  Benjamin E. Hermalin,et al.  The Economics of Product-Line Restrictions with an Application to the Network Neutrality Debate , 2007 .

[16]  Richard J. La,et al.  Interaction of service providers in task delegation under simple payment rules , 2009, Proceedings of the 48h IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) held jointly with 2009 28th Chinese Control Conference.