Quantitative measurement of damage caused by 1064-nm wavelength optical trapping of Escherichia coli cells using on-chip single cell cultivation system.

We quantitatively examined the possible damage to the growth and cell division ability of Escherichia coli caused by 1064-nm optical trapping. Using the synchronous behavior of two sister E. coli cells, the growth and interdivision times between those two cells, one of which was trapped by optical tweezers, the other was not irradiated, were compared using an on-chip single cell cultivation system. Cell growth stopped during the optical trapping period, even with the smallest irradiated power on the trapped cells. Moreover, the damage to the cell's growth and interdivision period was proportional to the total irradiated energy (work) on the cell, i.e., irradiation time multiplied by irradiation power. The division ability was more easily affected by a smaller energy, 0.36 J, which was 30% smaller than the energy that adversely affected growth, 0.54 J. The results indicate that the damage caused by optical trapping can be estimated from the total energy applied to cells, and furthermore, that the use of optical trapping for manipulating cells might cause damage to cell division and growth mechanisms, even at wavelengths under 1064 nm, if the total irradiation energy is excessive.

[1]  K Bergman,et al.  Characterization of photodamage to Escherichia coli in optical traps. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[2]  M. Berns,et al.  Wavelength dependence of cell cloning efficiency after optical trapping. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[3]  David I. K. Martin,et al.  Epigenetic inheritance at the agouti locus in the mouse , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[4]  C. Rao,et al.  Control, exploitation and tolerance of intracellular noise , 2002, Nature.

[5]  S. Gottesman,et al.  Cell-division control in Escherichia coli: specific induction of the SOS function SfiA protein is sufficient to block septation. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  G. Sonek,et al.  Evidence for localized cell heating induced by infrared optical tweezers. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[7]  F. Jacob,et al.  Thermosensitive mutants of E. coli affected in the processes of DNA synthesis and cellular division. , 1968, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[8]  Y Wakamoto,et al.  On-chip culture system for observation of isolated individual cells. , 2001, Lab on a chip.

[9]  Ove Axner,et al.  Stress response in Caenorhabditis elegans caused by optical tweezers: wavelength, power, and time dependence. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[10]  A. Ashkin,et al.  Optical trapping and manipulation of single cells using infrared laser beams , 1987, Nature.

[11]  Hiroyuki Moriguchi,et al.  Analysis of single-cell differences by use of an on-chip microculture system and optical trapping , 2001, Fresenius' journal of analytical chemistry.

[12]  P. Lansdorp,et al.  Lineage commitment in human hemopoiesis involves asymmetric cell division of multipotent progenitors and does not appear to be influenced by cytokines , 1993, Journal of cellular physiology.

[13]  D. Koshland,et al.  Non-genetic individuality: chance in the single cell , 1976, Nature.

[14]  M. Ko,et al.  The dose dependence of glucocorticoid‐inducible gene expression results from changes in the number of transcriptionally active templates. , 1990, The EMBO journal.

[15]  Kenji Yasuda,et al.  Development of non-destructive, non-contact single-cell based differential cell assay using on-chip microcultivation and optical tweezers , 2003 .

[16]  M W Berns,et al.  Physiological monitoring of optically trapped cells: assessing the effects of confinement by 1064-nm laser tweezers using microfluorometry. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[17]  T. Msadek When the going gets tough: survival strategies and environmental signaling networks in Bacillus subtilis. , 1999, Trends in microbiology.

[18]  R. D'ari,et al.  An inducible DNA replication–cell division coupling mechanism in E. coli , 1981, Nature.

[19]  T. Mukaihara,et al.  Deletion formation between the two Salmonella typhimurium flagellin genes encoded on the mini F plasmid: Escherichia coli ssb alleles enhance deletion rates and change hot-spot preference for deletion endpoints. , 1997, Genetics.

[20]  J. Gurdon,et al.  A community effect in animal development , 1988, Nature.