Effective Storm-Relative Helicity and Bulk Shear in Supercell Thunderstorm Environments

Abstract A sample of 1185 Rapid Update Cycle (RUC) model analysis (0 h) proximity soundings, within 40 km and 30 min of radar-identified discrete storms, was categorized by several storm types: significantly tornadic supercells (F2 or greater damage), weakly tornadic supercells (F0–F1 damage), nontornadic supercells, elevated right-moving supercells, storms with marginal supercell characteristics, and nonsupercells. These proximity soundings served as the basis for calculations of storm-relative helicity and bulk shear intended to apply across a broad spectrum of thunderstorm types. An effective storm inflow layer was defined in terms of minimum constraints on lifted parcel CAPE and convective inhibition (CIN). Sixteen CAPE and CIN constraint combinations were examined, and the smallest CAPE (25 and 100 J kg−1) and largest CIN (−250 J kg−1) constraints provided the greatest probability of detecting an effective inflow layer within an 835-supercell subset of the proximity soundings. Effective storm-relativ...

[1]  Comment on “Linear and Nonlinear Propagation of Supercell Storms” , 2003 .

[2]  K. Browning.  Airflow and Precipitation Trajectories Within Severe Local Storms Which Travel to the Right of the Winds , 1964 .

[3]  W. Briggs.  Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences , 2007 .

[4]  L. Lemon,et al.  New Severe Thunderstorm Radar Identification Techniques and Warning Criteria. , 1977 .

[5]  Charles A. Doswell,et al.  A Sensitivity Study of Hodograph-Based Methods for Estimating Supercell Motion , 2005 .

[6]  Erik N. Rasmussen,et al.  The Effect of Neglecting the Virtual Temperature Correction on CAPE Calculations , 1994 .

[7]  M. Weisman,et al.  Simulations of shallow supercell storms in landfalling hurricane environments , 1996 .

[8]  Donald W. Burgess,et al.  The National Severe Storms Laboratory Mesocyclone Detection Algorithm for the WSR-88D* , 1998 .

[9]  Richard L. Thompson,et al.  Predicting Supercell Motion Using a New Hodograph Technique , 2000 .

[10]  E. Rasmussen,et al.  A Baseline Climatology of Sounding-Derived Supercell and Tornado Forecast Parameters , 1998 .

[11]  Morris L. Weisman,et al.  The Use of Vertical Wind Shear versus Helicity in Interpreting Supercell Dynamics , 2000 .

[12]  Robert Davies-Jones,et al.  Linear and Nonlinear Propagation of Supercell Storms , 2002 .

[13]  Bradley R. Colman,et al.  Thunderstorms above Frontal Surfaces in Environments without Positive CAPE. Part I: A Climatology , 1990 .

[14]  Joseph B. Klemp,et al.  The structure and classification of numerically simulated convective storms in directionally varying wind shears , 1984 .

[15]  Jonathan M. Davies,et al.  Estimations of CIN and LFC Associated with Tornadic and Nontornadic Supercells , 2004 .

[16]  Joseph B. Klemp,et al.  Characteristics of Isolated Convective Storms , 1986 .

[17]  Richard L. Thompson,et al.  Close Proximity Soundings within Supercell Environments Obtained from the Rapid Update Cycle , 2003 .

[18]  E. McCaul.  Buoyancy and Shear Characteristics of Hurricane-Tornado Environments , 1991 .

[19]  Joseph B. Klemp,et al.  The Dependence of Numerically Simulated Convective Storms on Vertical Wind Shear and Buoyancy , 1982 .

[20]  Barry E. Schwartz,et al.  An Hourly Assimilation–Forecast Cycle: The RUC , 2004 .

[21]  Assessment of anticyclonic supercell environments using close proximity soundings from the RUC model , 2004 .

[22]  Robert Davies-Jones,et al.  Streamwise Vorticity: The Origin of Updraft Rotation in Supercell Storms , 1984 .