Optimizing differentiation and commonality levels among models in car line-ups: An empirical application of a nature-inspired heuristic mechanism

We implement a swarm intelligence mechanism to design optimal car lines.We aim to optimize differentiation and commonality levels among models in the line.Our mechanism utilizes stated preference data derived from a conjoint experiment.A prototype system is also developed to facilitate managerial decision making.Insights are provided into how new and existing car models must be combined. The product life cycle of cars is becoming shorter and carmakers constantly introduce new or revised models in their lines, tailored to their customer needs. At the same time, new car model design decisions may have a substantial effect on the cost and revenue drivers. For example, although a new car model configuration with component commonality may lower manufacturing cost, it also hinders increased revenues that could have been achieved through product differentiation. This paper develops and illustrates a state of the art, nature-inspired approach, to design car lines that optimize the degree of differentiation vs commonality among models in the line. More specifically, we apply a swarm intelligence mechanism to stated preference data derived from a large-scale conjoint experiment that measures consumer preferences for passenger cars in a sample of 1164 individuals. The proposed two-step methodology is also incorporated into a prototype system, which has been developed in an attempt to facilitate managerial decision making. Our approach provides interesting insights into how new and existing car models can be combined in a product line and identifies the desired balance between differentiation and commonality levels among models within a product line, which elevates customer satisfaction.

[1]  Keeheon Lee,et al.  Agent-based diffusion model for an automobile market with fuzzy TOPSIS-based product adoption process , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[2]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Thirty Years of Conjoint Analysis: Reflections and Prospects , 2001, Interfaces.

[3]  K. R. Baker,et al.  The Effect of Commonality on Safety Stock in a Simple Inventory Model , 1986 .

[4]  Charalampos Saridakis,et al.  Modeling price-related consequences of the brand origin cue: An empirical examination of the automobile market , 2016 .

[5]  Chu-Chai Henry Chan,et al.  Intelligent value-based customer segmentation method for campaign management: A case study of automobile retailer , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[6]  L. F. Scavarda,et al.  Handling Product Variety and its effects in Automotive Production , 2008 .

[7]  Kamalini Ramdas,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: A Cross-Functional Approach to Evaluating Multiple Line Extensions for Assembled Products , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[8]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  The Impact of Demographics, Built Environment Attributes, Vehicle Characteristics, and Gasoline Prices on Household Vehicle Holdings and Use , 2009 .

[9]  Hsiu-Yuan Hu,et al.  Preliminary research on customer satisfaction models in Taiwan: A case study from the automobile industry , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  J. S. Hunter,et al.  Statistics for experimenters : an introduction to design, data analysis, and model building , 1979 .

[11]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  Operationalizing technology improvements in product development decision-making , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 1995, Swarm Intelligence.

[13]  Evangelos Grigoroudis,et al.  Consumer choice behaviour and new product development: an integrated market simulation approach , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[14]  John Farr,et al.  Evaluation of multi-attribute decision making systems applied during the concept design of new microplasma devices , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[15]  Jonathan N. Katz,et al.  Random Coefficient Models for Time-Series—Cross-Section Data: Monte Carlo Experiments , 2004, Political Analysis.

[16]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Product platform design to improve commonality in custom products , 2003, J. Intell. Manuf..

[17]  Suresh K. Nair,et al.  Near optimal solutions for product line design and selection: beam search heuristics , 1995 .

[18]  George Baltas,et al.  Brand‐name effects, segment differences, and product characteristics: an integrated model of the car market , 2009 .

[19]  Stephane Hess,et al.  On the use of a Modified Latin Hypercube Sampling (MLHS) method in the estimation of a Mixed Logit Model for vehicle choice , 2006 .

[20]  Yoram Wind,et al.  Preference of Relevant Others and Individual Choice Models , 1976 .

[21]  Harald Hruschka,et al.  Genetic Algorithms for Product Design: How Well do They Really Work? , 2003 .

[22]  Nathaniel N. Beck Have We Learned in the Past Few Years , 2001 .

[23]  K. Ulrich,et al.  Planning for Product Platforms , 1998 .

[24]  Russell C. Eberhart,et al.  A discrete binary version of the particle swarm algorithm , 1997, 1997 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Computational Cybernetics and Simulation.

[25]  Ming-Feng Yeh,et al.  A modified particle swarm optimization for aggregate production planning , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[26]  Philippe Cattin,et al.  Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: An Update , 1989 .

[27]  Charalampos Saridakis,et al.  Measuring brand equity in the car market: a hedonic price analysis , 2010, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[28]  Matthias Holweg,et al.  The Second Century: Reconnecting Customer and Value Chain through Build-to-Order Moving beyond Mass and Lean Production in the Auto Industry , 2005 .

[29]  Liang Gao,et al.  A new methodology for multi-objective multidisciplinary design optimization problems based on game theory , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[30]  Rahul Rai,et al.  Agent-based optimization for product family design , 2006, Ann. Oper. Res..

[31]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[32]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Design for Postponement , 2003, Supply Chain Management.

[33]  John O. Summers,et al.  Reliability and Validity of Conjoint Analysis and Self-Explicated Weights: A Comparison , 1984 .

[34]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Effective Inventory and Service Management Through Product and Process Redesign , 1996, Oper. Res..

[35]  Charalabos Saridakis,et al.  A hybrid conjoint model for the identification of the UK supermarket choice determinants: an exploratory study , 2009 .

[36]  Kalyan Singhal,et al.  Supply chains and compatibility among components in product design , 2002 .

[37]  Andreas Herrmann,et al.  Conjoint Measurement: Methods and Applications , 2000 .

[38]  Ryuichi Kitamura,et al.  An analysis of household vehicle holding durations considering intended holding durations , 2000 .

[39]  P. Doyle,et al.  Random utility models in marketing research: a survey , 2001 .

[40]  Patrick R. McMullen,et al.  Optimal product design using a colony of virtual ants , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[41]  Charalampos Saridakis,et al.  An empirical investigation of the impact of behavioural and psychographic consumer characteristics on car preferences: An integrated model of car type choice , 2013 .

[42]  M. Holweg,et al.  Successful Build-to-Order Strategies Start With the Customer , 2001 .

[43]  Dick R. Wittink,et al.  Commercial use of conjoint analysis in Europe: Results and critical reflections , 1994 .

[44]  Varghese S. Jacob,et al.  An investigation of mating and population maintenance strategies in hybrid genetic heuristics for product line designs , 2006, Comput. Oper. Res..

[45]  N. Matsatsinis,et al.  Biologically Inspired Approaches to Strategic Service Design , 2013 .

[46]  R. Kohli,et al.  Heuristics for Product-Line Design Using Conjoint Analysis , 1990 .

[47]  Nikolaos F. Matsatsinis,et al.  Designing Optimal Products: Algorithms and Systems , 2009, Marketing Intelligent Systems Using Soft Computing.

[48]  Lauren Weihl La Jolla, California , 2016 .

[49]  Frédéric Ros,et al.  An efficient hybrid genetic algorithm to design finite impulse response filters , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[50]  Taylor Randall,et al.  Product Variety, Supply Chain Structure, and Firm Performance: Analysis of the U.S. Bicycle Industry , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[51]  Milan Martic,et al.  An approach to competitive product line design using conjoint data , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[52]  James D. Dana,et al.  Remark on "Appropriateness and Impact of Platform - Based Product Development" , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[53]  James Kennedy,et al.  The particle swarm: social adaptation of knowledge , 1997, Proceedings of 1997 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation (ICEC '97).

[54]  G. Whelan Modelling car ownership in Great Britain , 2007 .

[55]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Exploring smart phone improvements based on a hybrid MCDM model , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[56]  Li-Hsing Shih,et al.  Fuzzy product line design model while considering preference uncertainty: A case study of notebook computer industry in Taiwan , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[57]  Jayashankar M. Swaminathan,et al.  Product Line Design with Component Commonality and Cost-Reduction Effort , 2006, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[58]  T.-S. Jan,et al.  A four-role model of the automotive industry development in developing countries: a case in Taiwan , 2004, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[59]  B. Orme Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research , 2005 .

[60]  C. Bhat,et al.  Household Vehicle Type Holdings and Usage: An Application of the Multiple Discrete-Continuous Extreme Value (MDCEV) Model , 2006 .

[61]  Bruce Western,et al.  Causal Heterogeneity in Comparative Research: A Bayesian Hierarchical Modeling Approach , 1998 .

[62]  H. Fang,et al.  A discrete–continuous model of households’ vehicle choice and usage, with an application to the effects of residential density , 2008 .

[63]  R. Gupta,et al.  Development of hybrid genetic algorithms for product line designs , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[64]  Cheng Hsiao,et al.  Analysis of Panel Data , 1987 .

[65]  L. F. Scavarda,et al.  MANAGING COMPLEXITY IN AUTOMOTIVE PRODUCTION , 2007 .

[66]  Kamalini Ramdas MANAGING PRODUCT VARIETY: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW AND RESEARCH DIRECTIONS , 2003 .

[67]  Joe Miemczyk,et al.  Theoretical versus actual product variety: How much customisation do customers really demand? , 2011 .

[68]  Margaret J. Robertson,et al.  Design and Analysis of Experiments , 2006, Handbook of statistics.

[69]  Charalampos Saridakis,et al.  Hybrid particle swarm optimization with mutation for optimizing industrial product lines: An application to a mixed solution space considering both discrete and continuous design variables , 2013 .

[70]  Matthias Holweg,et al.  Linking Product Variety to Order-Fulfillment Strategies , 2004, Interfaces.

[71]  Bekir Karlik,et al.  An artificial neural networks approach on automobile pricing , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[72]  Michael K. Adjemian,et al.  Estimating Spatial Interdependence in Automobile Type Choice With Survey Data , 2010 .

[73]  Kannan Srinivasan,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Product Differentiation and Commonality in Design: Balancing Revenue and Cost Drivers , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[74]  P. Lenk,et al.  Hierarchical Bayes Conjoint Analysis: Recovery of Partworth Heterogeneity from Reduced Experimental Designs , 1996 .

[75]  K. Lancaster The Economics of Product Variety: A Survey , 1990 .

[76]  Shailendra Kumar,et al.  A knowledge based system for automated design of deep drawing die for axisymmetric parts , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[77]  Lee G. Cooper A Review of Multidimensional Scaling in Marketing Research , 1983 .

[78]  Gül E. Okudan Kremer,et al.  Planning for multiple-generation product lines using dynamic variable state models with data input from similar products , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[79]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Holistic Customer Requirements and the Design-Select Decision , 1999 .

[80]  Fu-Kwun Wang,et al.  Using adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system to forecast automobile sales , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[81]  Marija Kuzmanovic,et al.  A Conjoint-based approach to student evaluations of teaching performance , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[82]  Wann-Yih Wu,et al.  Applying conjoint analysis to evaluate consumer preferences toward subcompact cars , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[83]  Paul E. Green,et al.  On the Design of Choice Experiments Involving Multifactor Alternatives , 1974 .

[84]  Robert M. Freund,et al.  Optimizing Product Line Designs: Efficient Methods and Comparisons , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[85]  Don E. Waldman,et al.  Product Differentiation , 2006 .