Rational Prediction with Molecular Dynamics for Hit Identification

Although the motions of proteins are fundamental for their function, for pragmatic reasons, the consideration of protein elasticity has traditionally been neglected in drug discovery and design. This review details protein motion, its relevance to biomolecular interactions and how it can be sampled using molecular dynamics simulations. Within this context, two major areas of research in structure-based prediction that can benefit from considering protein flexibility, binding site detection and molecular docking, are discussed. Basic classification metrics and statistical analysis techniques, which can facilitate performance analysis, are also reviewed. With hardware and software advances, molecular dynamics in combination with traditional structure-based prediction methods can potentially reduce the time and costs involved in the hit identification pipeline.

[1]  M. Harvey,et al.  High-throughput molecular dynamics: the powerful new tool for drug discovery. , 2012, Drug discovery today.

[2]  G. de Fabritiis,et al.  Complete reconstruction of an enzyme-inhibitor binding process by molecular dynamics simulations , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Amy C. Anderson,et al.  Scoring Ensembles of Docked Protein: Ligand Interactions for Virtual Lead Optimization , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[4]  Robert V. Swift,et al.  Novel Naphthalene-Based Inhibitors of Trypanosoma brucei RNA Editing Ligase 1 , 2010, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[5]  Hege S. Beard,et al.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[6]  C. E. Peishoff,et al.  A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[7]  D. Kern,et al.  Dynamic personalities of proteins , 2007, Nature.

[8]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[9]  Junmei Wang,et al.  Development and testing of a general amber force field , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[10]  Anthony Nicholls,et al.  What do we know?: simple statistical techniques that help. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[11]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[12]  G.E. Moore,et al.  Cramming More Components Onto Integrated Circuits , 1998, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[13]  K. Schulten,et al.  Principal Component Analysis and Long Time Protein Dynamics , 1996 .

[14]  M. Lill Efficient incorporation of protein flexibility and dynamics into molecular docking simulations. , 2011, Biochemistry.

[15]  Anthony Nicholls,et al.  What do we know and when do we know it? , 2008, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[16]  Katrina W Lexa,et al.  Protein flexibility in docking and surface mapping , 2012, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[17]  R. Ellis,et al.  Macromolecular crowding: an important but neglected aspect of the intracellular environment. , 2001, Current opinion in structural biology.

[18]  M. DePristo,et al.  Is one solution good enough? , 2006, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[19]  Rommie E. Amaro,et al.  An improved relaxed complex scheme for receptor flexibility in computer-aided drug design , 2008, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[20]  J M Blaney,et al.  A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  James Andrew McCammon,et al.  Predictive Power of Molecular Dynamics Receptor Structures in Virtual Screening , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[22]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Automated docking with grid‐based energy evaluation , 1992 .

[23]  J. Andrew McCammon,et al.  Discovery of drug-like inhibitors of an essential RNA-editing ligase in Trypanosoma brucei , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: Limitations of gas‐phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[25]  G. Vriend,et al.  Exploring Protein Dynamics Space: The Dynasome as the Missing Link between Protein Structure and Function , 2012, PloS one.

[26]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Conformational analysis of flexible ligands in macromolecular receptor sites , 1992 .

[27]  Christopher I. Bayly,et al.  Evaluating Virtual Screening Methods: Good and Bad Metrics for the "Early Recognition" Problem , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[28]  Wolfgang Wenzel,et al.  Receptor flexibility in small‐molecule docking calculations , 2011 .

[29]  Anthony G. Lee Lipid-protein interactions. , 2011, Biochemical Society transactions.

[30]  Daniel-Adriano Silva,et al.  A Role for Both Conformational Selection and Induced Fit in Ligand Binding by the LAO Protein , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[31]  Yaoqi Zhou,et al.  Structure-based prediction of RNA-binding domains and RNA-binding sites and application to structural genomics targets , 2010, Nucleic acids research.

[32]  Vincent Le Guilloux,et al.  Fpocket: An open source platform for ligand pocket detection , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[33]  Woody Sherman,et al.  Generation of Receptor Structural Ensembles for Virtual Screening Using Binding Site Shape Analysis and Clustering , 2012, Chemical biology & drug design.

[34]  Jonathan D Hirst,et al.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations Using Graphics Processing Units , 2011, Molecular informatics.

[35]  T. Oas,et al.  Conformational selection or induced fit: A flux description of reaction mechanism , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  M. Karplus,et al.  Locally accessible conformations of proteins: Multiple molecular dynamics simulations of crambin , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[37]  G. Hommel,et al.  Confidence interval or p-value?: part 4 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications. , 2009, Deutsches Arzteblatt international.

[38]  Michael Nilges,et al.  BIOINFORMATICS APPLICATIONS NOTE doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl655 Structural bioinformatics Biskit—A software platform for structural bioinformatics , 2006 .

[39]  William L. Jorgensen,et al.  Discovery of Wild-Type and Y181C Mutant Non-nucleoside HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors Using Virtual Screening with Multiple Protein Structures , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[40]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[41]  Somesh D. Sharma,et al.  Managing protein flexibility in docking and its applications. , 2009, Drug discovery today.

[42]  William L Jorgensen,et al.  From docking false-positive to active anti-HIV agent. , 2007, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[43]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Systematic Exploitation of Multiple Receptor Conformations for Virtual Ligand Screening , 2011, PloS one.

[44]  Jung-Hsin Lin,et al.  The relaxed complex method: Accommodating receptor flexibility for drug design with an improved scoring scheme. , 2003, Biopolymers.

[45]  Rachelle J Bienstock,et al.  Computational drug design targeting protein-protein interactions. , 2012, Current pharmaceutical design.

[46]  Ferenc Orosz,et al.  From “fluctuation fit” to “conformational selection”: Evolution, rediscovery, and integration of a concept , 2011, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[47]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Development and Testing of the OPLS All-Atom Force Field on Conformational Energetics and Properties of Organic Liquids , 1996 .

[48]  Mengang Xu,et al.  Utilizing Experimental Data for Reducing Ensemble Size in Flexible-Protein Docking , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[49]  J. Ponder,et al.  Force fields for protein simulations. , 2003, Advances in protein chemistry.

[50]  Shuxing Zhang,et al.  Computational prediction of protein hot spot residues. , 2012, Current pharmaceutical design.

[51]  Matthias Rarey,et al.  In Pursuit of Fully Flexible Protein‐Ligand Docking: Modeling the Bilateral Mechanism of Binding , 2010, Molecular informatics.

[52]  Woody Sherman,et al.  Exploring protein flexibility: incorporating structural ensembles from crystal structures and simulation into virtual screening protocols. , 2012, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[53]  Laxmikant V. Kalé,et al.  Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[54]  Matthew P. Repasky,et al.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[55]  L. Nilsson,et al.  Structure and Dynamics of the TIP3P, SPC, and SPC/E Water Models at 298 K , 2001 .

[56]  R. Baron,et al.  Water in Cavity−Ligand Recognition , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[57]  F. Niesen,et al.  The use of differential scanning fluorimetry to detect ligand interactions that promote protein stability , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[58]  Jacob D. Durrant,et al.  POVME: an algorithm for measuring binding-pocket volumes. , 2011, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[59]  Lorenz M Mayr,et al.  Novel trends in high-throughput screening. , 2009, Current opinion in pharmacology.

[60]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  A semiempirical free energy force field with charge‐based desolvation , 2007, J. Comput. Chem..

[61]  T. Schlick,et al.  Biomolecular modeling and simulation: a field coming of age , 2011, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[62]  Stéphanie Pérot,et al.  Druggable pockets and binding site centric chemical space: a paradigm shift in drug discovery. , 2010, Drug discovery today.

[63]  Max W. Chang,et al.  Virtual Screening for HIV Protease Inhibitors: A Comparison of AutoDock 4 and Vina , 2010, PloS one.

[64]  Ariel Fernández,et al.  Purposely engineered drug-target mismatches for entropy-based drug optimization. , 2012, Trends in biotechnology.

[65]  Robert P. Sheridan,et al.  Protocols for Bridging the Peptide to Nonpeptide Gap in Topological Similarity Searches , 2001, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[66]  Kenneth M Merz,et al.  Molecular recognition and drug-lead identification: what can molecular simulations tell us? , 2010, Current medicinal chemistry.

[67]  C. Dobson,et al.  Protein Dynamics: Moore's Law in Molecular Biology , 2011, Current Biology.

[68]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  CHARMM general force field: A force field for drug‐like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all‐atom additive biological force fields , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[69]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Computational drug design accommodating receptor flexibility: the relaxed complex scheme. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[70]  Rommie E. Amaro,et al.  Emerging methods for ensemble-based virtual screening. , 2010, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[71]  T. Clackson,et al.  A hot spot of binding energy in a hormone-receptor interface , 1995, Science.

[72]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. , 1998, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[73]  Oliver Korb,et al.  Potential and Limitations of Ensemble Docking , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[74]  Emidio Capriotti,et al.  Bioinformatics and variability in drug response: a protein structural perspective , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[75]  Ajay N. Jain,et al.  Recommendations for evaluation of computational methods , 2008, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[76]  Philippe Derreumaux,et al.  Flexibility and binding affinity in protein–ligand, protein–protein and multi-component protein interactions: limitations of current computational approaches , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[77]  Heather A Carlson,et al.  Exploring protein-ligand recognition with Binding MOAD. , 2006, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[78]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  Virtual compound screening in drug discovery. , 2012, Future medicinal chemistry.

[79]  Jeffrey W. Peng,et al.  Communication breakdown: protein dynamics and drug design. , 2009, Structure.

[80]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Recipes for the Selection of Experimental Protein Conformations for Virtual Screening , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[81]  William L. Jorgensen,et al.  Search for Non-Nucleoside Inhibitors of HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase Using Chemical Similarity, Molecular Docking, and MM-GB/SA Scoring , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[82]  Stefano Piana,et al.  Automated Event Detection and Activity Monitoring in Long Molecular Dynamics Simulations. , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[83]  Xiaoqin Zou,et al.  Scoring functions and their evaluation methods for protein-ligand docking: recent advances and future directions. , 2010, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[84]  Eric T. Kim,et al.  How does a drug molecule find its target binding site? , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[85]  Jianpeng Ma,et al.  CHARMM: The biomolecular simulation program , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[86]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[87]  Carsten Kutzner,et al.  GROMACS 4:  Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular Simulation. , 2008, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[88]  Oliver Beckstein,et al.  MDAnalysis: A toolkit for the analysis of molecular dynamics simulations , 2011, J. Comput. Chem..

[89]  Federico D. Sacerdoti,et al.  Scalable Algorithms for Molecular Dynamics Simulations on Commodity Clusters , 2006, ACM/IEEE SC 2006 Conference (SC'06).

[90]  Yuan-Ping Pang,et al.  Structure-based discovery of dengue virus protease inhibitors. , 2009, Antiviral research.

[91]  Julian Tirado-Rives,et al.  Potential energy functions for atomic-level simulations of water and organic and biomolecular systems. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[92]  Leo S. D. Caves,et al.  Bio3d: An R Package , 2022 .

[93]  Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al.  Representing receptor flexibility in ligand docking through relevant normal modes. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[94]  Huan‐Xiang Zhou From induced fit to conformational selection: a continuum of binding mechanism controlled by the timescale of conformational transitions. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[95]  W. Delano Unraveling hot spots in binding interfaces: progress and challenges. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[96]  Rhiju Das,et al.  Are Protein Force Fields Getting Better? A Systematic Benchmark on 524 Diverse NMR Measurements. , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[97]  H. Gohlke,et al.  Structure-based computational analysis of protein binding sites for function and druggability prediction. , 2012, Journal of biotechnology.

[98]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Gated Diffusion-controlled Reactions , 2011, BMC biophysics.

[99]  Wei Zhao,et al.  A statistical framework to evaluate virtual screening , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.