The Continuum Hypothesis

The problem actually arose with the birth of set theory; indeed, in many respects it stimulated the birth of set theory. In 1874 Cantor had shown that there is a one-to-one correspondence between the natural numbers and the algebraic numbers. More surprisingly, he showed that there is no oneto-one correspondence between the natural numbers and the real numbers. Taking the existence of a one-to-one correspondence as a criterion for when two sets have the same size (something he certainly did by 1878), this result shows that there is more than one level of infinity and thus gave birth to the higher infinite in mathematics. Cantor immediately tried to determine whether there were any infinite sets of real numbers that were of intermediate size, that is, whether there was an infinite set of real numbers that could not be put into one-to-one correspondence with the natural numbers and could not be put into one-to-one correspondence with the real numbers. The continuum hypothesis (under one formulation) is simply the statement that there is no such set of real numbers. It was through his attempt to prove this hypothesis that led Cantor do develop set theory into a sophisticated branch of mathematics. 1 Despite his efforts Cantor could not resolve CH. The problem persisted and was considered so important by Hilbert that he placed it first on his famous list of open problems to be faced by the 20 th century. Hilbert also struggled to resolve CH, again without success. Ultimately, this lack of ~ ~

[1]  W. Hugh Woodin,et al.  Suitable Extender Models I , 2010, J. Math. Log..

[2]  P. Larson,et al.  Regular embeddings of the stationary tower and Woodin's maximality theorem , 2010, The Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[3]  Peter Koellner,et al.  Strong logics of first and second order , 2010, Bull. Symb. Log..

[4]  W. Hugh Woodin,et al.  Incompatible Ω-Complete Theories , 2009, The Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[5]  Godehard Link Set Theory after Russell: The Journey Back to Eden , 2004 .

[6]  Godehard Link,et al.  One hundred years of Russell's paradox : mathematics, logic, philosophy , 2004 .

[7]  P. Welch,et al.  THE AXIOM OF DETERMINACY, FORCING AXIOMS, AND THE NONSTATIONARY IDEAL (de Gruyter Series in Logic and its Applications 1) , 2001 .

[8]  Karsten Steffens,et al.  Introduction to Cardinal Arithmetic , 1999 .

[9]  W. Hugh Woodin,et al.  The Axiom of Determinacy, Forcing Axioms, and the Nonstationary Ideal , 1999 .

[10]  Matthew Foreman,et al.  Large Cardinals and Definable Counterexamples to the Continuum Hypothesis , 1995, Ann. Pure Appl. Log..

[11]  Saharon Shelah,et al.  Correction to “Martin’s Maximum, saturated ideals, and non-regular ultrafilters. Part I” , 1989 .

[12]  Daniel Cordero Grau THE CONTINUUM HYPOTHESIS , 2013 .

[13]  W. Woodin Set Theory, Arithmetic, and Foundations of Mathematics: The continuum hypothesis, the generic-multiverse of sets, and the Ω conjecture , 2011 .

[14]  William J. Mitchell,et al.  Beginning Inner Model Theory , 2010 .

[15]  John R. Steel,et al.  An Outline of Inner Model Theory , 2010 .

[16]  Matthew Foreman,et al.  Handbook of Set Theory , 2010 .

[17]  P. Larson,et al.  An Ω-logic Primer , 2006 .

[18]  W. Hugh Woodin,et al.  The Continuum Hypothesis, Part I , 2001 .

[19]  W. Woodin The Continuum Hypothesis , Part II , 2001 .

[20]  Ààòòòóóó Óó Ëëø Ìììóöý Óööññò¸ããòòñóöö¸òò Åååååóö´´´×ºµ Ååö ½½¸¾¼¼½ , 2001 .

[21]  S. Shelah,et al.  Martin's Maximum, saturated ideals and non-regular ultrafilters. Part II , 1988 .

[22]  Michael Hallett Cantorian set theory and limitation of size , 1984 .

[23]  Dennis Martin,et al.  Hilbert''s first problem: The Con-tinuum Hypothesis , 1976 .