Benefit of Complete Response in Multiple Myeloma Limited to High-Risk Subgroup Identified by Gene Expression Profiling

Experimental Design: To determine whether the clinical benefit of complete remission (CR) may depend on prognostic subgroups of patients with multiple myeloma. Patients and Methods: Newly diagnosed patients with myeloma received a tandem autotransplant regimen. Using multivariate regression analyses, we examined the prognostic implications of time-dependent onset of CR on overall survival and event-free survival in the context of standard prognostic factors (SPF) and gene expression profiling–derived data available for 326 patients. Results: CR benefited patients regardless of risk status when only SPFs were examined. With knowledge of gene array data, a survival (and event-free survival) benefit of CR only pertained to the small high-risk subgroup of 13% of patients (hazard ratio, 0.23; P = 0.001), whereas the majority of patients with low-risk disease had similar survival expectations whether or not CR was achieved (hazard ratio, 0.68; P = 0.128). Conclusions: Access to gene expression information permitted the recognition of a small very high-risk subgroup of 13% of patients, in whom prolonged survival critically depended on achieving CR. Absence of such benefit in the remainder should lead to a reassessment of clinical trial designs that rely on this end point as a surrogate for long-term prognosis.

[1]  B. Barlogie,et al.  High serum-free light chain levels and their rapid reduction in response to therapy define an aggressive multiple myeloma subtype with poor prognosis. , 2007, Blood.

[2]  B. Barlogie,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in multiple myeloma: diagnostic and clinical implications. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  B. Barlogie,et al.  Complete response in myeloma extends survival without, but not with history of prior monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance or smouldering disease , 2007, British journal of haematology.

[4]  Yongsheng Huang,et al.  A validated gene expression model of high-risk multiple myeloma is defined by deregulated expression of genes mapping to chromosome 1. , 2006, Blood.

[5]  David R Williams,et al.  Gene-expression signature of benign monoclonal gammopathy evident in multiple myeloma is linked to good prognosis. , 2006, Blood.

[6]  B. Barlogie,et al.  Retrospective Analysis of Fractionated High-Dose Melphalan (F-MEL) and Bortezomib-Thalidomide-Dexamethasone (VTD) with Autotransplant (AT) Support for Advanced and Refractory Multiple Myeloma (AR-MM). , 2006 .

[7]  N. Schmitz,et al.  Dose-escalated CHOP plus etoposide (MegaCHOEP) followed by repeated stem cell transplantation for primary treatment of aggressive high-risk non-Hodgkin lymphoma. , 2006, Blood.

[8]  John Crowley,et al.  Total therapy 2 without thalidomide in comparison with total therapy 1: role of intensified induction and posttransplantation consolidation therapies. , 2006, Blood.

[9]  John Crowley,et al.  Thalidomide and hematopoietic-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  B. Barlogie,et al.  Cure of myeloma: hype or reality? , 2005, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[11]  J. Crowley,et al.  Magnitude of response with myeloma frontline therapy does not predict outcome: importance of time to progression in southwest oncology group chemotherapy trials. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  R. Bataille,et al.  Single versus double autologous stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  F. Zhan,et al.  Continuous absence of metaphase-defined cytogenetic abnormalities, especially of chromosome 13 and hypodiploidy, ensures long-term survival in multiple myeloma treated with Total Therapy I: interpretation in the context of global gene expression. , 2003, Blood.

[14]  John Crowley,et al.  Global gene expression profiling of multiple myeloma, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, and normal bone marrow plasma cells. , 2002, Blood.

[15]  B. Barlogie,et al.  Results of high-dose therapy for 1000 patients with multiple myeloma: durable complete remissions and superior survival in the absence of chromosome 13 abnormalities. , 2000, Blood.

[16]  J Crowley,et al.  Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  B. Barlogie,et al.  Total therapy with tandem transplants for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. , 1999, Blood.

[18]  S. Jagannath,et al.  CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING DISEASE RESPONSE AND PROGRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE MYELOMA TREATED BY HIGH‐DOSE THERAPY AND HAEMOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION , 1998, British journal of haematology.

[19]  J. Rossi,et al.  A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation and Chemotherapy in Multiple Myeloma , 1996 .

[20]  B. Barlogie,et al.  Cytogenetic findings in 200 patients with multiple myeloma. , 1995, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[21]  C. Coltman,et al.  Hydroxyldaunomycin (adriamycin) combination chemotherapy in malignant lymphoma , 1976, Cancer.

[22]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .