Sex Differences in Body Movement and Visual Attention: An Integrated Analysis of Movement and Gaze in Mixed-Sex Dyads

The body movement and visual behavior of women and men engaged in mixed-sex dyadic interactions were analyzed in a three-factorial design including the personal factor sex of the interactants, the situational factor partner familiarity, and the situational factor visual attention of the interaction partner. Measures of nonverbal activity were derived from integrated time-series protocols of body movement and gaze for both interaction partners. Data analysis revealed significant sex differences in individual frequency and duration of movement and gaze, as well as dyadic differences for both behavior measures. Men, in general, were more active while women were more visually attentive. Also, the results point to specific interaction effects between sex and familiarity. The data indicate that there were specific adaptational strategies for both sexes with familiar and unfamiliar partners.

[1]  William Ickes,et al.  The Role of Sex and Self-Monitoring in Unstructured Dyadic Interactions , 1977 .

[2]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Decoding visual dominance: Attributions of power based on relative percentages of looking while speaking and looking while listening. , 1982 .

[3]  V. Derlega,et al.  Influence of Touch and Preferences for Control on Visual Behavior and Subjective Responses , 1985 .

[4]  A. Halberstadt,et al.  Gender, nonverbal behavior, and perceived dominance: A test of the theory. , 1987 .

[5]  H. M. Leet-Pellegrini,et al.  Conversational Dominance as a Function of Gender and Expertise , 1980 .

[6]  C. Peterson,et al.  The Development and Sex-Related Use of Interruption Behavior , 1993 .

[7]  C. West,et al.  AGAINST OUR WILL: MALE INTERRUPTIONS OF FEMALES IN CROSS‐SEX CONVERSATION * , 1979 .

[8]  Gary Bente,et al.  Facilities for the graphical computer simulation of head and body movements , 1989 .

[9]  Allan Mazur,et al.  A Biosocial Model of Status in Face-to-Face Primate Groups , 1985 .

[10]  J. R. Aiello.  A test of equilibrium theory: Visual interaction in relation to orientation, distance and sex of interactants , 1972 .

[11]  R. Exline,et al.  Visual Behavior as an Aspect of Power Role Relationships , 1975 .

[12]  Donald W. Fiske,et al.  Face-to-face interaction: Research, methods, and theory , 1977 .

[13]  R. Edelberg,et al.  Affective Orientation and Physiological Activity (GSR) in Small Peer Groups , 1963, Psychosomatic medicine.

[14]  Judith A. Hall.  Gender Effects in Decoding Nonverbal Cues , 1978 .

[15]  Biosocial factors in dyadic communication: Sex and speaking intensity. , 1972 .

[16]  R. Manderscheid,et al.  Gender differences in competition and dominance during married-couples group therapy. , 1981, Social psychology quarterly.

[17]  A. Vrugt,et al.  Sex differences in nonverbal communication , 1984 .

[18]  N. Henley,et al.  Gender and Nonverbal Behavior , 1981 .

[19]  M. Walker,et al.  Switching pauses in cooperative and competitive conversations , 1984 .

[20]  H. Rosenfeld,et al.  Approval-seeking and approval-inducing functions of verbal and nonverbal responses in the dyad. , 1966 .

[21]  Norman S. Endler,et al.  Interactional psychology and personality , 1976 .

[22]  F. W. Gibson,et al.  Personal space as influenced by sex and type of movement. , 1970, The Journal of psychology.

[23]  A. Kendon.  Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. , 1967, Acta psychologica.

[24]  W. L. Libby,et al.  Eye contact and direction of looking as stable individual differences. , 1970 .

[25]  Judith A. Hall.  Nonverbal sex differences : communication accuracy and expressive style , 1984 .

[26]  F. N. Willis.  Initial speaking distance as a function of the speakers’ relationship , 1966 .

[27]  Clifford E. Brown,et al.  The relationship of social power to visual displays of dominance between men and women. , 1988 .

[28]  C. Keating,et al.  Power Displays Between Women and Men in Discussions of Gender-Linked Tasks: A Multichannel Study , 1988 .

[29]  C. Ridgeway,et al.  Nonverbal Behavior, Dominance, and the Basis of Status in Task Groups , 1987 .

[30]  A. Mulac,et al.  Male/female language differences and effects in same‐sex and mixed‐sex dyads: The gender‐linked language effect , 1988 .

[31]  A. Mulac,et al.  Male/Female Gaze in Same‐Sex and Mixed‐Sex Dyads Gender‐Linked Differences and Mutual Influence , 1987 .

[32]  N. Henley,et al.  Body Politics: Power, Sex, and Nonverbal Communication , 1977 .

[33]  R. Exline,et al.  VISUAL BEHAVIOR IN A DYAD AS AFFECTED BY INTERVIEW CONTENT AND SEX OF RESPONDENT. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Nonverbal Communication: The Unspoken Dialogue , 1988 .

[35]  Gary Bente,et al.  Person perception effects of computer-simulated male and female head movement , 1996 .

[36]  Martha Davis,et al.  Sex Differences in Body Movements and Positions , 1981 .

[37]  D. Fromme,et al.  Dominance and sex differences in nonverbal responses to differential eye contact , 1974 .

[38]  Eye Contact, Attitudes, and Attitude Change among Males , 1972 .

[39]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Visual Behavior and Dominance in Women and Men , 1981 .

[40]  Paul Ekman,et al.  Measuring hand movements , 1979 .

[41]  K. Dindia.  The Effects of Sex of Subject and Sex of Partner on Interruptions , 1987 .

[42]  Susan J. Frances.  Sex differences in nonverbal behavior , 1979 .

[43]  C. J. Huberty,et al.  Multivariate analysis versus multiple univariate analyses. , 1989 .

[44]  Sex Differences, Dominance, and Physical Attractiveness in the Use of Nonverbal Emblems , 1978 .

[45]  William Ickes,et al.  A Basic Paradigm for the Study of Personality, Roles, and Social Behavior , 1982 .

[46]  Spontaneous motor activity in healthy volunteers after single doses of haloperidol. , 1989, International clinical psychopharmacology.

[47]  P. Ellsworth,et al.  Visual Behavior in Social Interaction , 1972 .

[48]  R. Exline,et al.  Visual interaction: The glances of power and preference. , 1971 .

[49]  H P Hirsbrunner,et al.  Analyzing nonverbal behavior in depression. , 1983, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[50]  William C. Donaghy,et al.  Head movement and gender differences following the onset of simultaneous speech , 1991 .

[51]  Adam Kendon,et al.  Looking in conversation and the regulation of turns at talk: A comment on the papers of G Beattie and D. R. Rutter et al. , 1978 .

[52]  Carl T. Camden,et al.  A new look at interruptions , 1983 .

[53]  A. Mulac.  Men's and Women's Talk in Same-Gender and Mixed-Gender Dyads: Power or Polemic?' , 1989 .

[54]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  Communicative effects of gaze behavior: a test of two contrasting explanations , 1986 .

[55]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Reducing Sex Differences in Visual Displays of Dominance , 1990 .

[56]  John Thibaut,et al.  VISUAL INTERACTION IN RELATION TO MACHIAVELLIANISM AND AN UNETHICAL ACT. , 1966 .

[57]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  On the self-fulfilling nature of apparent sex differences in behavior , 1975 .

[58]  Jerry L. Cohen,et al.  Communicator Style and Social Style: Similarities and Differences between the Sexes. , 1988 .

[59]  Theodore A. Lamb.  Nonverbal and Paraverbal Control in Dyads and Triads: Sex or Power Differences? , 1981 .