CMOS APS MTF modeling

In this paper, a unified model, based on a thorough analysis of experimental data, is developed for the overall modulation transfer function (MTF) estimation for CMOS image sensors. The model covers the physical diffusion effect together with the influence of the pixel active area geometrical shape. Comparison of both our predicted results and the MTF calculated from the point spread function (PSF) measurements of an actual pixel array gives excellent agreement. This confirms the hypothesis that the active area shape together with the photocarrier diffusion effect are the determining factors of the overall CMOS active pixel sensor (APS) MTF behavior, and allows us to extract the minority-carrier diffusion length. The results indicate that for any potential active area shape, a reliable estimate of image performance is possible, so the tradeoff between the conflicting requirements, such as signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and MTF could be compared per pixel design.

[1]  Orly Yadid-Pecht,et al.  Unique sub-micron scanning system use for CMOS APS crosstalk characterization , 2003, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[2]  Eric G. Stevens,et al.  An analytical, aperture, and two-layer carrier diffusion MTF and quantum efficiency model for solid-state image sensors , 1994 .

[3]  Norman S. Kopeika,et al.  A System Engineering Approach to Imaging , 1998 .

[4]  Orly Yadid-Pecht,et al.  CMOS APS crosstalk characterization via a unique submicron scanning system , 2003 .

[5]  Eric G. Stevens,et al.  A unified model of carrier diffusion and sampling aperture effects on MTF in solid-state image sensors , 1992 .

[6]  Bimal P. Mathur,et al.  Analytical charge collection and MTF model for photodiode-based CMOS imagers , 2002 .

[7]  Orly Yadid-Pecht.  The Geometrical Modulation Transfer Function (MTF)-for different pixel active area shapes , 2001 .

[8]  E.T. Nelson,et al.  Steady-state photocarrier collection in silicon imaging devices , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[9]  James P. Lavine,et al.  Monte Carlo Simulation of the Photoelectron Crosstalk in Silicon Imaging Devices , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems.

[10]  Wolfgang Fichtner,et al.  Combined optical/electrical simulation of CCD cell structures by means of the finite-difference time-domain method , 1998 .

[11]  S. G. Chamberlain,et al.  MTF simulation including transmittance effects and experimental results of charge-coupled imagers , 1978 .

[12]  Eric R. Fossum,et al.  CMOS image sensors: electronic camera on a chip , 1995, Proceedings of International Electron Devices Meeting.

[13]  D. Kavaldjiev,et al.  SUBPIXEL SENSITIVITY MAP FOR A CHARGE-COUPLED DEVICE SENSOR , 1998 .

[14]  J. Boyd,et al.  Computer simulation of optical crosstalk in linear imaging arrays , 1981 .

[15]  D. Robinson,et al.  A method for improving the spatial resolution of frontside-illuminated CCD's , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[16]  Orly Yadid-Pecht.  Geometrical modulation transfer function for different pixel active area shapes , 2000 .

[17]  P. Bhattacharya,et al.  Semiconductor Optoelectronic Devices , 1993 .

[18]  Thomas Spirig,et al.  Smart CCD/CMOS based image sensors with programmable, real-time, temporal and spatial convolution capabilities for applications in machine vision and optical metrology , 1997 .

[19]  D. H. Seib,et al.  Carrier diffusion degradation of modulation transfer function in charge coupled imagers , 1974 .

[20]  H. Grubin.  The physics of semiconductor devices , 1979, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics.

[21]  Y. Ishihara,et al.  Smear reduction in the interline CCD image sensor , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[22]  Kevin M. Kramer,et al.  Semiconductor Devices: A Simulation Approach , 1997 .

[23]  Hon-Sum Philip Wong,et al.  Technology and device scaling considerations for CMOS imagers , 1996 .

[24]  Tracy E. Dutton,et al.  Survey and comparison of focal plane MTF measurement techniques , 2002, SPIE Optics + Photonics.