Deciphering the scientific literature on SDG interactions: A review and reading guide.

The 2030 Agenda includes 17 overarching Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). These are integrated in nature, and a principle of indivisibility should guide their implementation. Yet, the 2030 Agenda itself does not provide guidance on what indivisibility means in practice, how the SDGs interact, or on how to assess these interactions. The fast-emerging field of what could be referred to as SDG interaction studies seeks to provide such guidance, but as of yet there is no general agreement on what it means to take an integrated approach to the SDGs. Hence, navigating the diverse research landscape on SDG interactions might prove challenging. This paper aims to decipher the literature on SDG interactions by providing an overview of the current research, based on a sample of 70 peer-reviewed articles. The review explores four themes in SDG interaction research by mapping: (i) policy challenges typically addressed, (ii) ways in which SDG 'interactions' have been conceptualized, (iii) data sources used, and (iv) methods of analysis frequently employed. Research gaps are identified, where perspectives largely missing include policy innovation, and integrated monitoring and evaluation. Further, few studies consider actor interactions, account for geographic spill-overs, analyze SDG indicator interactions, employ participatory methods, or take a whole-systems approach to the 2030 Agenda. Failing to address these gaps could lead to inefficient SDG implementation and delay goal attainment. Another contribution of the paper is a reading guide, proposing a way to decipher the literature along the themes emerging from the review, and offering a structure to code future papers.

[1]  Ingrid J. Visseren-Hamakers,et al.  The Sustainable Development Goals and REDD+: assessing institutional interactions and the pursuit of synergies , 2017, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.

[2]  Jing Sun,et al.  Nexus approaches to global sustainable development , 2018, Nature Sustainability.

[3]  J. Abonyi,et al.  Evaluating the Interconnectedness of the Sustainable Development Goals Based on the Causality Analysis of Sustainability Indicators , 2018, Sustainability.

[4]  D. Blanc Towards Integration at Last?: The Sustainable Development Goals as a Network of Targets , 2015 .

[5]  Jianguo Liu,et al.  Integration across a metacoupled world , 2017 .

[6]  Matteo Pedercini,et al.  Toward achieving Sustainable Development Goals in Ivory Coast: Simulating pathways to sustainable development , 2018 .

[7]  Robert Walker,et al.  Roads & SDGs, tradeoffs and synergies: learning from Brazil’s Amazon in distinguishing frontiers , 2018 .

[8]  D. Rybski,et al.  A Systematic Study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Interactions , 2017 .

[9]  Jonathan D. Moyer,et al.  Alternative pathways to human development: Assessing trade-offs and synergies in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals , 2019, Futures.

[10]  Birgit Kopainsky,et al.  A Food Systems Perspective for Food and Nutrition Security beyond the Post‐2015 Development Agenda , 2018 .

[11]  Manfred Denich,et al.  Participatory, explorative, qualitative modeling: application of the iMODELER software to assess trade-offs among the SDGs , 2018 .

[12]  Lewis Akenji,et al.  An Optimistic Analysis of the Means of Implementation for Sustainable Development Goals: Thinking about Goals as Means , 2016 .

[13]  Tobias Heimann,et al.  Bioeconomy and SDGs: Does the Bioeconomy Support the Achievement of the SDGs? , 2019, Earth's Future.

[14]  Kent Buse,et al.  Gender, health and the 2030 agenda for sustainable development , 2018, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[15]  Graciela Metternicht,et al.  Indicator-based assessments of progress towards the sustainable development goals (SDGs): a case study from the Arab region , 2017, Sustainability Science.

[16]  Kate E. Jones,et al.  Mapping synergies and trade-offs between urban ecosystems and the sustainable development goals , 2019, Environmental Science & Policy.

[17]  J. Minx,et al.  Analysing interactions among Sustainable Development Goals with Integrated Assessment Models , 2019, Global Transitions.

[18]  Ed C. M. Noyons,et al.  A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[19]  Henrik Carlsen,et al.  Towards systemic and contextual priority setting for implementing the 2030 Agenda , 2017, Sustainability Science.

[20]  Mathew Kurian,et al.  Governance of Water-Energy-Food Nexus: A Social Network Analysis Approach to Understanding Agency Behaviour , 2018 .

[21]  Serenella Sala,et al.  Roadmap to Rebound: How to Address Rebound Effects from Resource Efficiency Policy , 2018, Sustainability.

[22]  D. Vuuren,et al.  Pathways to achieve a set of ambitious global sustainability objectives by 2050: Explorations using the IMAGE integrated assessment model , 2015 .

[23]  M E J Newman,et al.  Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[24]  K. Riahi,et al.  The roads ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century , 2017 .

[25]  Kirsty L Nash,et al.  Linked sustainability challenges and trade-offs among fisheries, aquaculture and agriculture , 2017, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[26]  Faisal Ahmed,et al.  Determination of hierarchical relationships among sustainable development goals using interpretive structural modeling , 2018, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[27]  D. McCollum,et al.  Connecting the sustainable development goals by their energy inter-linkages , 2018 .

[28]  Martina Flörke,et al.  Analysing trade-offs between SDGs related to water quality using salinity as a marker , 2019, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability.

[29]  M. Leach,et al.  Integration: the key to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals , 2016, Sustainability Science.

[30]  Kevin Hernandez,et al.  A Foresight Scenario Method for Thinking About Complex Sustainable Development Interactions , 2016 .

[31]  Tomoko Hasegawa,et al.  Synergy potential between climate change mitigation and forest conservation policies in the Indonesian forest sector: implications for achieving multiple sustainable development objectives , 2018, Sustainability Science.

[32]  James Patterson,et al.  Implementing the “Sustainable Development Goals” : towards addressing three key governance challenges—collective action, trade-offs, and accountability , 2017 .

[33]  J. Engel-Cox,et al.  Toward an Understanding of Synergies and Trade-Offs Between Water, Energy, and Food SDG Targets , 2018, Front. Environ. Sci..

[34]  S. Keesstra,et al.  Soil-Related Sustainable Development Goals: Four Concepts to Make Land Degradation Neutrality and Restoration Work , 2018, Land.

[35]  D. McCollum,et al.  Mapping interactions between the sustainable development goals: lessons learned and ways forward , 2018, Sustainability Science.

[36]  Carina Wyborn,et al.  Reframing the sustainable development goals to achieve sustainable development in the Anthropocene-a systems approach , 2018 .

[37]  D. Griggs,et al.  Policy: Map the interactions between Sustainable Development Goals , 2016, Nature.

[38]  H. Hoff,et al.  Integrated SDG Implementation—How a Cross-Scale (Vertical) and Cross-Regional Nexus Approach Can Complement Cross-Sectoral (Horizontal) Integration , 2018 .

[39]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Policy making for global food security in a volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous (VUCA) world , 2017 .

[40]  Anita Breuer,et al.  Translating Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Interdependencies into Policy Advice , 2019, Sustainability.

[41]  Walter E. Baethgen,et al.  Translating the Sustainable Development Goals into action: A participatory backcasting approach for developing national agricultural transformation pathways , 2016 .

[42]  P. Yillia,et al.  Water-Energy-Food nexus: framing the opportunities, challenges and synergies for implementing the SDGs , 2016, Österreichische Wasser- und Abfallwirtschaft.

[43]  Mario Biggeri,et al.  Tracking the SDGs in an ‘integrated’ manner: A proposal for a new index to capture synergies and trade-offs between and within goals , 2019, World Development.

[44]  D. Lusseau,et al.  Income-based variation in Sustainable Development Goal interaction networks , 2019, Nature Sustainability.

[45]  Steffen Fritz,et al.  Assessing the land resource–food price nexus of the Sustainable Development Goals , 2016, Science Advances.

[46]  János Abonyi,et al.  Automated Analysis of the Interactions Between Sustainable Development Goals Extracted from Models and Texts of Sustainability Science , 2018 .

[47]  James R. Mihelcic,et al.  More than Target 6.3: A Systems Approach to Rethinking Sustainable Development Goals in a Resource-Scarce World , 2016 .

[48]  Mark Mulligan,et al.  Mapping nature's contribution to SDG 6 and implications for other SDGs at policy relevant scales , 2020 .

[49]  M E J Newman,et al.  Modularity and community structure in networks. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  Arthur L. Dahl,et al.  The emerging accountability regimes for the Sustainable Development Goals and policy integration: Friend or foe? , 2018, Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space.

[51]  Semida Silveira,et al.  Evaluating Synergies and Trade-Offs among Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Explorative Analyses of Development Paths in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa , 2018 .

[52]  Graciela Metternicht,et al.  Prioritising SDG targets: assessing baselines, gaps and interlinkages , 2018, Sustainability Science.

[53]  Bert de Vries,et al.  A physically-based model of long-term food demand , 2017 .

[54]  M. Apollonia,et al.  Interlinkages and policy coherence for the Sustainable Development Goals implementation: An operational method to identify trade-offs and co-benefits in a systemic way , 2019 .

[55]  Benno Pokorny,et al.  Community Forestry and the Sustainable Development Goals: A Two Way Street , 2018, Forests.

[56]  J. Alcamo Water quality and its interlinkages with the Sustainable Development Goals , 2019, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability.

[57]  Carrie V. Kappel,et al.  Distilling the role of ecosystem services in the Sustainable Development Goals , 2018 .

[58]  W. Cheung,et al.  A rapid assessment of co-benefits and trade-offs among Sustainable Development Goals , 2017, Marine Policy.

[59]  Rebecca Hodes,et al.  The stuff that dreams are made of: HIV‐positive adolescents’ aspirations for development , 2018, Journal of the International AIDS Society.

[60]  Corinne Hartin,et al.  Implications of sustainable development considerations for comparability across nationally determined contributions , 2018, Nature Climate Change.

[61]  Matteo Pedercini,et al.  Policy coherence to achieve the SDGs: using integrated simulation models to assess effective policies , 2017, Sustainability Science.

[62]  Christian Kroll,et al.  Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Are we successful in turning trade-offs into synergies? , 2019, Palgrave Communications.

[63]  Lorenza Campagnolo,et al.  The Ex-Ante Evaluation of Achieving Sustainable Development Goals , 2018 .

[64]  Gloria V. Rupf,et al.  From goals to joules: A quantitative approach of interlinkages between energy and the Sustainable Development Goals , 2019, Energy Research & Social Science.

[65]  A. Tukker,et al.  Trade-offs between social and environmental Sustainable Development Goals , 2018, Environmental Science & Policy.

[66]  G. Metternicht,et al.  Initial progress in implementing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): a review of evidence from countries , 2018, Sustainability Science.

[67]  Wang Yongsheng,et al.  A Multi-Agent Model for Urban Water-Energy-Food Sustainable Development Simulation , 2017 .

[68]  Robert J. Nicholls,et al.  Potential Trade-Offs between the Sustainable Development Goals in Coastal Bangladesh , 2018 .