Accrual Accounting in EU Local Governments: One Method, Several Approaches

This paper seeks to measure the degree of accrual implementation in EU local government accounting systems and also tries to give an answer to the question of why accrual accounting has overcome the resistance to other New Public Management (NPM) reforms in countries relatively suspicious of them. We carry out our analysis through the comparison of the accrual accounting legal requirements in force in each country, and the published financial statements, taking the IPSASs of the IFAC as a benchmark. The results show different degrees of accrual accounting implementation and legal compliance. The reason of accrual accounting dissemination lies partially in that the dual systems implemented in European Continental countries do not require the introduction of deep organizational changes and answer the democratic demands of citizens for higher responsiveness, transparency and accountability, while traditional budgetary statements are maintained for monitoring compliance with legality and for administrative decision-making purposes.

[1]  J. Mack,et al.  Reflections on the theoretical underpinnings of the general‐purpose financial reports of Australian government departments , 2006 .

[2]  J. Guthrie.  Application of accrual accounting in the Australian public sector - rhetoric or reality? , 1998 .

[3]  Renate E. Meyer,et al.  New Public Management in Austria: Local Variation on a Global Theme? , 2005 .

[4]  T. Carlin.  Debating the Impact of Accrual Accounting and Reporting in the Public Sector , 2005 .

[5]  Irvine Lapsley,et al.  The Diffusion of Accounting Practices in the New 'Managerial' Public Sector , 2003 .

[6]  I. Sanderson,et al.  Performance Management, Evaluation and Learning in ‘Modern’ Local Government , 2001 .

[7]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[8]  Jerold L. Zimmerman,et al.  MUNICIPAL ACCOUNTING MAZE - ANALYSIS OF POLITICAL INCENTIVES , 1977 .

[9]  I. Sanderson,et al.  Towards pluralism and partnership in management development in local government , 1996 .

[10]  T. Toonen.  ANALYSING INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRANSFORMATION: A COMPARATIVE VIEW , 1993 .

[11]  C. Ryan.  The introduction of accrual reporting policy in the Australian public sector , 1998 .

[12]  R. Torstendahl,et al.  Public management and administrative reform in Western Europe , 1999 .

[13]  W. Niskanen.  Bureaucracy and representative government , 1971 .

[14]  Luc Rouban,et al.  The Administrative Modernisation Policy in France , 2001 .

[15]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  Lessons from Experience: Experiential Learning in Administrative Reforms in Eight Democracies , 1996 .

[16]  Bill Jenkins,et al.  FROM PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION TO PUBLIC MANAGEMENT: REASSESSING A REVOLUTION? , 1995 .

[17]  P. Sutcliffe.  The Standards Programme of IFAC's Public Sector Committee , 2003 .

[18]  Kenneth P. Ruscio,et al.  Trust, Democracy, and Public Management: A Theoretical Argument , 1996 .

[19]  Bjöırn Brorströım.  Accrual Accounting, Politics and Politicians , 1998 .

[20]  William D. Coplin,et al.  The Professional Researcher as Change Agent in the Government-Performance Movement. , 2002 .

[21]  Johan Christiaens,et al.  Converging New Public Management Reforms and Diverging Accounting Practices in Flemish Local Governments , 2001 .

[22]  Jan-Erik Lane,et al.  New Public Management , 2021, Bangladesh Journal of Public Administration.

[23]  Mingyi Hung,et al.  ACCOUNTING STANDARDS AND VALUE RELEVANCE OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: AN INTERNATIONAL ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[24]  Lawrence Pratchett.  New Technologies and the Modernization of Local Government: an Analysis of Biases and Constraints , 1999 .

[25]  T. J. Brignall,et al.  An Institutional Perspective on Performance Measurement and Management in the 'New Public Sector' , 2000 .

[26]  J. L. Chan.  Government Accounting: An Assessment of Theory, Purposes and Standards , 2003 .

[27]  G. Ceriani,et al.  Critical notes to Exposure Draft of a proposed IFRS for Small and Medium-Sized Entities , 2007 .

[28]  J. March,et al.  Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol. , 1981 .

[29]  Phipps Arabie,et al.  Three-way scaling and clustering. , 1987 .

[30]  M. J. Moon,et al.  Linking Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government and Trust in Government , 2004 .

[31]  Robert W. Scapens,et al.  Conceptualizing management accounting change: an institutional framework☆ , 2000 .

[32]  Francesco Kjellberg,et al.  The dynamics of institutional change : local government reorganization in western democracies , 1988 .

[33]  Gary Meek,et al.  Accounting: An International Perspective , 1990 .

[34]  J. Guthrie,et al.  Global Warning: Debating International Developments in New Public Financial Management , 1998 .

[35]  Jane Broadbent,et al.  Control and Legitimation in Government Accountability Processes: The Private Finance Initiative in the UK , 2001 .

[36]  Esteban G. Dalehite.  Determinants of Performance Measurement: An Investigation into the Decision to Conduct Citizen Surveys , 2008 .

[37]  Geert Bouckaert,et al.  Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis , 2004 .

[38]  L. Torres.  Trajectories in public administration reforms in European Continental countries , 2004 .

[39]  L. Torres,et al.  Reshaping Public Sector Accounting: An International Comparative View , 2009 .

[40]  B. Peters.  American Public Policy: Promise and Performance , 1986 .

[41]  C. Hood.  EMERGING ISSUES IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION , 1995 .

[42]  Robert W. Scapens,et al.  Never mind the gap: towards an institutional perspective on management accounting practice , 1994 .

[43]  C. Molinero,et al.  The measurement of intangible assets in public sector using scaling techniques , 2003 .

[44]  Jones,et al.  International Public Financial Management Reform: Progress, Contradictions, and Challenges , 2005 .

[45]  Robert W. Scapens,et al.  Stability and change: an institutionalist study of management accounting change , 2005 .

[46]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality , 1984 .

[47]  John Burns.  The dynamics of accounting change Inter‐play between new practices, routines, institutions, power and politics , 2000 .

[48]  Irvine Lapsley,et al.  Modern Costing Innovations and Legitimation: A Health Care Study , 2004 .

[49]  ‘Public Service’, ‘Public Management’ and the ‘Modernization’ of French Public Administration , 1999 .

[50]  P. John.  Local governance in Western Europe , 2001 .

[51]  J. Kruskal.  Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method , 1964 .

[52]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[53]  P. Julnes,et al.  Promoting the Utilization of Performance Measures in Public Organizations: An Empirical Study of Factors Affecting Adoption and Implementation , 2001 .

[54]  Luca Lo Schiavo,et al.  Quality Standards in the Public Sector: Differences Between Italy and the UK in the Citizen’s Charter initiative , 2000 .

[55]  S. Taylor,et al.  Bureaucratic Expertise versus Legislative Authority: A Model of Deception and Monitoring in Budgeting , 1985, American Political Science Review.

[56]  Robert W. Scapens,et al.  Institutional Theories and Management Accounting Change: Contributions, Issues and Paths for Development , 2006 .

[57]  Hans-Gerd Ridder,et al.  Analysis of Public Management Change Processes: The Case of Local Government Accounting Reforms in Germany , 2005 .

[58]  Irvine Lapsley,et al.  Accounting and the New Public Management: Instruments of Substantive Efficiency or a Rationalising Modernity? , 1999 .

[59]  Steve Letza,et al.  Reframing privatisation: Deconstructing the myth of efficiency , 2004 .

[60]  C. Hood,et al.  From old public administration to new public management , 1994 .

[61]  J. Hesse.  FROM TRANSFORMATION TO MODERNIZATION: ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGE IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE , 1993 .

[62]  Raymond Saner,et al.  Beyond New Public Management. Answering the Claims of both Politics and Society , 2005 .

[63]  J. M. Buchanan,et al.  The Economics of politics , 1978 .

[64]  Željko Šević.  Measuring performance on a local government level in a transitional country: the case of Serbia , 2005 .

[65]  G. Paulsson,et al.  Reforming governmental accounting and budgeting in Europe. Chapter 8: Sweden , 2003 .

[66]  John Halligan,et al.  Toward Participatory and Transparent Governance: Report on the Sixth Global Forum on Reinventing Government: , 2005 .

[67]  J. Chandler.  Questioning the New Public Management , 2004 .

[68]  David Clark,et al.  The Modernization of the French Civil Service: Crisis, Change and Continuity , 1998 .

[69]  Walter J.M. Kickert,et al.  Public Management in the United States and Europe , 2001 .

[70]  J. A. Nordin.  Theory of public choice , 1972 .

[71]  S. Ogden,et al.  THE ROLE OF ACCOUNTING IN ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE: PROMOTING PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENTS IN THE PRIVATISED UK WATER INDUSTRY , 1999 .

[72]  V. Fournier.  The Appeal to ‘Professionalism’ as a Disciplinary Mechanism , 1999 .

[73]  I. Lapsley,et al.  Accounting, management and organizational change: A comparative study of local government , 2000 .

[74]  J. Straussman.  Technical assistance to local governments in Hungary: the limits of best practice , 2001 .