You did not mean it: Perceived good intentions alleviate sense of unfairness.

Previous research has reported that feedback-related negativity (FRN) may represent the degree of perceived unfairness in the ultimatum game (UG). However, few studies have incorporated intention-related consideration in examining the neural correlates of fairness perception. To address this issue, the present study introduced an intentional UG paradigm to disentangle the effect of perceived intention from fairness concerns, using an event-related potential (ERP) analysis. Consistent with the hypothesis, the behavioral results indicated that good intention could markedly reduce rejection rates, and this intention effect was modulated by the degree of fairness, which was more prominent under unfair scenarios. Further electrophysiological results showed that, for the unfair division schemes, FRN and P300 amplitudes were significantly different between offers proposed with good intention and those with bad intention, while such discrepancies were not observed for the fair condition. In summary, converging results demonstrated that perceived intention can modulate the effect of fairness in social decision-making.

[1]  M. Sutter,et al.  Outcomes versus intentions: On the nature of fair behavior and its development with age , 2007 .

[2]  Agustín Ibáñez,et al.  Size and probability of rewards modulate the feedback error-related negativity associated with wins but not losses in a monetarily rewarded gambling task , 2010, NeuroImage.

[3]  W. Güth,et al.  An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining , 1982 .

[4]  Qing-guo Ma,et al.  The undermining effect of facial attractiveness on brain responses to fairness in the Ultimatum Game: an ERP study , 2015, Front. Neurosci..

[5]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The Neural Basis of Economic Decision-Making in the Ultimatum Game , 2003, Science.

[6]  E Donchin,et al.  P300 and stimulus categorization: two plus one is not so different from one plus one. , 1980, Psychophysiology.

[7]  M. Deutsch.  Equity, Equality, and Need: What Determines Which Value Will Be Used as the Basis of Distributive Justice? , 1975 .

[8]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  On the Nature of Fair Behavior , 1999 .

[9]  Qing-guo Ma,et al.  I endeavor to make it: Effort increases valuation of subsequent monetary reward , 2014, Behavioural Brain Research.

[10]  Xiaolin Zhou,et al.  The P300 and reward valence, magnitude, and expectancy in outcome evaluation , 2009, Brain Research.

[11]  S. Fiske,et al.  Intentional Harms Are Worse, Even When They’re Not , 2013, Psychological science.

[12]  M. Coles,et al.  The influence of the magnitude, probability, and valence of potential wins and losses on the amplitude of the feedback negativity. , 2012, Psychophysiology.

[13]  E. Van Dijk,et al.  Social Comparison Affects Brain Responses to Fairness in Asset Division: An ERP Study with the Ultimatum Game , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[14]  Tristen K. Inagaki,et al.  Shared Neural Mechanisms Underlying Social Warmth and Physical Warmth , 2013, Psychological science.

[15]  Yuru Wang,et al.  The delay effect on outcome evaluation: results from an event-related potential study , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[16]  Anna Weinberg,et al.  Event‐related potential activity in the basal ganglia differentiates rewards from nonrewards: Temporospatial principal components analysis and source localization of the feedback negativity , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[17]  Qing-guo Ma,et al.  You Have My Word: Reciprocity Expectation Modulates Feedback-Related Negativity in the Trust Game , 2015, PloS one.

[18]  Sina Radke,et al.  There's Something about a Fair Split: Intentionality Moderates Context-Based Fairness Considerations in Social Decision-Making , 2012, PloS one.

[19]  E. Donchin,et al.  On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. , 1977, Psychophysiology.

[20]  Giuseppe Sartori,et al.  Mentalizing in economic decision-making , 2008, Behavioural Brain Research.

[21]  Anna Weinberg,et al.  Show me the Money: The impact of actual rewards and losses on the feedback negativity , 2014, Brain and Cognition.

[22]  Lucas S. Broster,et al.  Beyond valence and magnitude: A flexible evaluative coding system in the brain , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  J. Henrich,et al.  Costly Punishment Across Human Societies , 2006, Science.

[24]  Matthew D. Lieberman,et al.  The Sunny Side of Fairness , 2008, Psychological science.

[25]  N. Eisenberger.  The Neural Bases of Social Pain: Evidence for Shared Representations With Physical Pain , 2012, Psychosomatic medicine.

[26]  Serge A R B Rombouts,et al.  Unfair? It depends: neural correlates of fairness in social context. , 2010, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[27]  Terry Lohrenz,et al.  To Detect and Correct: Norm Violations and Their Enforcement , 2007, Neuron.

[28]  R. E. Martin.  Event-related potential studies of outcome processing and feedback-guided learning , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[29]  Zhiheng Zhou,et al.  To do or not to do? Action enlarges the FRN and P300 effects in outcome evaluation , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  S. Blount.  When Social Outcomes Aren't Fair: The Effect of Causal Attributions on Preferences , 1995 .

[31]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  Neural regions that underlie reinforcement learning are also active for social expectancy violations , 2010, Social neuroscience.

[32]  Klaus M. Schmidt,et al.  A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation , 1999 .

[33]  R. Simons,et al.  Psychophysiological correlates of interpersonal cooperation and aggression , 2013, Biological Psychology.

[34]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  Testing Theories of Fairness - Intentions Matter , 2000, Games Econ. Behav..

[35]  John J. B. Allen,et al.  Smiling faces, sometimes they don't tell the truth: facial expression in the ultimatum game impacts decision making and event-related potentials. , 2014, Psychophysiology.

[36]  W. Nelson.  Equity or intention: it is the thought that counts , 2002 .

[37]  Idit Shalev,et al.  The substitutability of physical and social warmth in daily life. , 2012, Emotion.

[38]  Serge A. R. B. Rombouts,et al.  Dissociable brain networks involved in development of fairness considerations: Understanding intentionality behind unfairness , 2011, NeuroImage.

[39]  Qing-guo Ma,et al.  The sweet side of inequality: How advantageous status modulates empathic response to others’ gains and losses , 2013, Behavioural Brain Research.

[40]  Maarten A. S. Boksem,et al.  Fairness concerns predict medial frontal negativity amplitude in ultimatum bargaining , 2010, Social neuroscience.