Constituting Relationships in Talk A Taxonomy of Speech Events in Social and Personal Relationships

In a series of four studies, a descriptive taxonomy of dyadic speech events in everyday relating was developed and employed to explore the constitutive functions of interpersonal communication. Twenty-nine speech events were identified and replicated through a variety of multi-method procedures, including unstructured and structured diary records, judgment sorting tasks, and semantic-differential rating scaks. Everyday relating appears to be dominated by six kinds of talk events: gossip, making plans, joking around, catching up, small talk, and recapping the day's events. The taxonomy of speech events appears to be organized along three dimensions: formal/goal-directed, important/deep/involving, and positive valence. Preliminary evidence suggests how different types of personal relationships are constituted in different speech events.

[1]  R. Hays,et al.  The Day-to-Day Functioning of Close versus Casual Friendships , 1989 .

[2]  M. J. Norušis,et al.  SPSS base system user's guide , 1990 .

[3]  Sally Planalp.  Friends' and Acquaintances' Conversations II: Coded Differences , 1993 .

[4]  Joseph P. Forgas,et al.  Social Episodes: The Study of Interaction Routines , 1980 .

[5]  M. Goodwin.  He-Said-She-Said: Talk As Social Organization Among Black Children , 1993 .

[6]  Tamar Katriel,et al.  “What we need is communication”: “Communication” as a cultural category in some American speech , 1981 .

[7]  S. Duck.  Meaningful relationships : talking, sense, and relating , 1994 .

[8]  M. Saville‐Troike.  The ethnography of communication , 1982 .

[9]  M. Aldenderfer.  Cluster Analysis , 1984 .

[10]  R. Hinde.  Towards understanding relationships , 1979 .

[11]  E. Berscheid,et al.  Help Wanted: A Grand Theorist of Interpersonal Relationships, Sociologist or Anthropologist Preferred , 1995 .

[12]  A. Strauss.  Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[13]  S. Duck.  Relationships as Unfinished Business: Out of the Frying Pan and into the 1990s , 1990 .

[14]  K. Basso.  Portraits of "The Whiteman": Linguistic Play and Cultural Symbols Among the Western Apache , 1979 .

[15]  Stuart J. Sigman,et al.  Handling the Discontinuous Aspects of Continuous Social Relationships: Toward Research on the Persistence of Social Forms , 1991 .

[16]  Thomas S. Frentz,et al.  Language‐action: A paradigm for communication , 1976 .

[17]  S. Heath.  Ways with Words: Language, Life and Work in Communities and Classrooms , 1983 .

[18]  From the Orthogenic Principle to the Fish-Scale Model of Omniscience: Advancing Understanding of Personal Relationships , 1995 .

[19]  L. Baxter,et al.  Cultural Terms for Communication Events among Some American High School Adolescents. , 1990 .

[20]  W. Leeds-Hurwitz,et al.  Forum Introduction: Social Approaches to Interpersonal Communication , 1992 .

[21]  S. Planalp,et al.  Friends' and Acquaintances' Conversations I: Perceived Differences , 1992 .

[22]  Deborah Tannen,et al.  Framing in Discourse , 1993 .

[23]  Jeffrey D. Robinson,et al.  “How are you?”: Negotiating phatic communion , 1992, Language in Society.

[24]  James M. Honeycutt.  Memory structures for the rise and fall of personal relationships. , 1993 .

[25]  Steven W. Duck,et al.  Some Evident Truths About Conversations in Everyday Relationships All Communications Are Not Created Equal , 1991 .

[26]  L. Baxter.  Interpersonal Communication as Dialogue: A Response to the “Social Approaches” Forum , 1992 .

[27]  R. Harré,et al.  The explanation of social behaviour , 1973 .

[28]  Kathy Kellermann,et al.  The conversation mop: Scenes in the stream of discourse , 1989 .

[29]  J. Shotter.  Cultural Politics of Everyday Life: Social Constructionism, Rhetoric and Knowing of the Third Kind , 1993 .

[30]  Kathy Kellermann.  The Conversation MOP II. Progression Through Scenes in Discourse , 1991 .