How Designers conceive utility, usefulness and needs construction in design: an exploratory study with three contrasted designers’ profiles

WORDS MAX) Usefulness is considered as a major criterion in ergonomics design. Our objective is to show that heterogeneity and diversity of designers' profiles could lead to a partially shared representation of the utility and usefulness, methods and tools. To do this, we explore the representations of engineers, graphic designers and ergonomists on the utility, usefulness and needs construction in the design. The methodology developed for studying these representations is a categorical analysis of verbalisations produced during semi-structured interviews. We provide elements of understanding on the relationship between the designer's profiles and the representations on the definitions of utility and usefulness, and on the needs construction process (design phases, methods, tools and stakeholders involved).

[1]  H. Cramér Mathematical methods of statistics , 1947 .

[2]  Françoise Darses,et al.  How do designers represent to themselves the users' needs? , 2006, Applied ergonomics.

[3]  Gülay Hasdoǧan,et al.  The role of user models in product design for assessment of user needs , 1996 .

[4]  Beatrice Alenljung,et al.  Portraying the practice of decision-making in requirements engineering: a case of large scale bespoke development , 2008, Requirements Engineering.

[5]  Simon Richir,et al.  Anticipating and Evaluating the Usefulness of Emerging Technologies in Ergonomic Design: a Review of Usefulness in Design , 2013 .

[6]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[7]  Jean-Marc Bernard,et al.  Analysis of Local or Asymmetric Dependencies in Contingency Tables using the Imprecise Dirichlet Model , 2003, International Symposium on Imprecise Probabilities and Their Applications.

[8]  Jean-Marie Burkhardt,et al.  Analyse exploratoire de “ points de vue ” : une contribution pour outiller les processus de conception , 2005 .

[9]  Willemien Visser,et al.  Méthodes et outils pour l’analyse des verbalisations : une contribution à l’analyse du modèle de l’interlocuteur dans la description d’itinéraires , 2005 .

[10]  J. Gosby MEDIA REVIEWS: Basics of Qualitative Research - Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory 2nd Edition by A. Strauss and J. Corbin. Sage Publications, , 2000 .

[11]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[12]  Jesper Kjeldskov,et al.  Human-Computer Interaction Design for Emerging Technologies: Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality and Mobile Computer Systems , 2003 .

[13]  Margarita Anastassova,et al.  Prototype Evaluation and User-Needs Analysis in the Early Design of Emerging Technologies , 2007, HCI.

[14]  Elie Fadier,et al.  Towards proactive safety in design: a comparison of safety integration approaches in two design processes , 2005, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[15]  Nathalie Bonnardel,et al.  The Impact of Technology on Creativity in Design: An Enhancement? , 2010 .

[16]  Olivier Christmann,et al.  Requirements Prioritization by End-users and Consequences on Design of a Virtual Reality Software - An Exploratory Study , 2013, ENASE.

[17]  John S. Gero,et al.  Future Directions for Design Creativity Research , 2011 .

[18]  Carole Bouchard,et al.  TRENDS: a content-based information retrieval system for designers , 2010, SIGGRAPH '10.

[19]  A. Andrews,et al.  4 Requirements Prioritization , .