On COVID-19 Modelling

This is an analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic by comparably simple mathematical and numerical methods. The final goal is to predict the peak of the epidemic outbreak per country with a reliable technique. The difference to other modelling approaches is to stay extremely close to the available data, using as few hypotheses and parameters as possible. For the convenience of readers, the basic notions of modelling epidemics are collected first, focusing on the standard SIR model. Proofs of various properties of the model are included. But such models are not directly compatible with available data. Therefore a special variation of a SIR model is presented that directly works with the data provided by the Johns Hopkins University. It allows to monitor the registered part of the pandemic, but is unable to deal with the hidden part. To reconstruct data for the unregistered Infected, a second model uses current experimental values of the infection fatality rate and a data-driven estimation of a specific form of the recovery rate. All other ingredients are data-driven as well. This model allows predictions of infection peaks. Various examples of predictions are provided for illustration. They show what countries have to face that are still expecting their infection peak. Running the model on earlier data shows how closely the predictions follow the transition from an uncontrolled outbreak to the mitigation situation by non-pharmaceutical interventions like contact restrictions.

[1]  Robert Schaback Modelling Recovered Cases and Death Probabilities for the COVID-19 Outbreak , 2020 .

[2]  P. Colaneri,et al.  Modelling the COVID-19 epidemic and implementation of population-wide interventions in Italy , 2020, Nature Medicine.

[3]  Fred Brauer,et al.  Compartmental Models in Epidemiology , 2008, Mathematical Epidemiology.

[4]  Johannes Zierenberg,et al.  Inferring change points in the spread of COVID-19 reveals the effectiveness of interventions , 2020, Science.

[5]  G. Barbastathis,et al.  Quantifying the effect of quarantine control in Covid-19 infectious spread using machine learning , 2020, medRxiv.

[6]  D. Brockmann,et al.  Effective containment explains subexponential growth in recent confirmed COVID-19 cases in China , 2020, Science.

[7]  Adeel Razi,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling of COVID-19. , 2020, Wellcome open research.

[8]  K. Kim,et al.  What Is COVID-19? , 2020, Frontiers for Young Minds.

[9]  Matthias an der Heiden,et al.  Modellierung von Beispielszenarien der SARS-CoV-2-Epidemie 2020 in Deutschland , 2020 .

[10]  Michael Meyer-Hermann,et al.  Estimate of the development of the epidemic reproduction number Rt from Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 case data and implications for political measures based on prognostics , 2020, medRxiv.

[11]  M. Nöthen,et al.  Infection fatality rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a German community with a super-spreading event , 2020 .

[12]  P. Klepac,et al.  Early dynamics of transmission and control of COVID-19: a mathematical modelling study , 2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

[13]  W. O. Kermack,et al.  A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics , 1927 .

[14]  Frank C. Hoppensteadt,et al.  A problem in the theory of epidemics , 1970 .

[15]  S. Eubank,et al.  Commentary on Ferguson, et al., “Impact of Non-pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) to Reduce COVID-19 Mortality and Healthcare Demand” , 2020, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology.

[16]  Daniele Raimondi,et al.  Modeling the COVID-19 outbreaks and the effectiveness of the containment measures adopted across countries , 2020, medRxiv.

[17]  C. Whittaker,et al.  Estimates of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019: a model-based analysis , 2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

[18]  Herbert W. Hethcote,et al.  The Mathematics of Infectious Diseases , 2000, SIAM Rev..

[19]  Frank C. Hoppensteadt,et al.  A problem in the theory of epidemics, II , 1971 .

[20]  Johannes Zierenberg,et al.  Inferring COVID-19 spreading rates and potential change points for case number forecasts , 2020, medRxiv.