The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial particles of orientation

In the previous two chapters we have argued that the semantics of over, under, above and below differentially reference the vertical axis (or what Langacker, 1987, terms ‘oriented space’). As such, these spatial particles serve to partition conceptual space in terms of verticality. In this chapter, we turn to a subset of spatial particles whose semantics crucially involves an additional element, the orientation of either the LM or the TR. We will deal with four forms which relate to an oriented TR: up, down, to and for , and four which relate to an oriented LM: in front of, before, behind and after. Orientation is a designation of a conceptual front/back, top/bottom, or lateral partitioning of either the TR or the LM. This conceptual partitioning has its basis in a perceived asymmetry of the partitioned entity. Such asymmetry can arise as a result of the way the entity typically stands or sits, its shape (e.g., if an object has a pointed end, it is typically understood as its ‘front’) (Talmy, 2000), its perceived parts (Talmy, 2000), its perceived ‘directedness’ (Talmy, 2000: 199), its movement (Fillmore, 1971), or the way it is used by humans (e.g., the ‘front’ of a building is the side which is accessible for general entry) (Langacker, 1987), as well as its perceived resemblance to human beings or animals (Fillmore, 1971; Herskovits, 1986; Svorou, 1994). Clearly, the attributes which give rise to an object being conceptualized as asymmetric involve how humans both perceive and interact with the object.

[1]  R. Jackendoff Consciousness and the Computational Mind , 1987 .

[2]  C. Sinha,et al.  Language, culture, and the embodiment of spatial cognition , 2001 .

[3]  R. Dirven,et al.  Dividing up physical and mental space into conceptual categories by means of English prepositions , 1993 .

[4]  D. Ziegeler Retention in ontogenetic and diachronic grammaticalization , 1997 .

[5]  R. Quirk A Grammar of contemporary English , 1974 .

[6]  Mark L. Johnson The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning , 1987 .

[7]  Soteria Svorou,et al.  The grammar of space , 1994 .

[8]  Norman H. Freeman,et al.  Spatial Reference Systems and the Canonicality Effect in Infant Search. , 1981 .

[9]  D. Schiffrin,et al.  Anaphoric then: aspectual, textual, and epistemic meaning , 1992 .

[10]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Philosophy in the flesh : the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 1999 .

[11]  Anatol C. Kreitzer,et al.  Multiple levels of schematization: A study in the conceptualization of space , 1997 .

[12]  E. Rosch,et al.  The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience , 1993 .

[13]  G. Miller,et al.  Language and Perception , 1976 .

[14]  H. H. Clark SPACE, TIME, SEMANTICS, AND THE CHILD , 1973 .

[15]  B. Heine,et al.  Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework , 1991 .

[16]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  The Architecture of the Language Faculty , 1996 .

[17]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[18]  H. Grice Logic and conversation , 1975 .

[19]  Anna Wierzbicka Why do We Say in April, on Thursday, at 10 O'Clock? In Search of an Explanation , 1993 .

[20]  D. Sandra,et al.  Network analyses of prepositional meaning: Mirroring whose mind—the linguist’s or the language user’s? , 1995 .

[21]  Friedrich Ungerer,et al.  An introduction to cognitive linguistics , 1999 .

[22]  Michael J. Preston,et al.  A complete concordance to The Chester mystery plays , 1981 .

[23]  J. Mandler How to build a baby: On the development of an accessible representational system☆ , 1988 .

[24]  R. Baillargeon A model of physical reasoning in infancy , 1995 .

[25]  Georgia M. Green Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding , 1989 .

[26]  J. Carlos Languages of the Mind , 1995 .

[27]  J. Piaget Play, dreams and imitation in childhood , 1951 .

[28]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  Linguistic evidence and mental representations , 1998 .

[29]  Ronald W. Langacker,et al.  Concept, Image, and Symbol , 1990 .

[30]  Priska-Monika Hottenroth,et al.  Prepositions and object concepts: A contribution to cognitive semantics , 1993 .

[31]  D. Slobin Learning To Think For Speaking: Native Language, Cognition, And Rhetorical Style , 1991 .

[32]  Andrea Tyler,et al.  The relation between experience, conceptual structure and meaning: non-temporal uses of tense and language teaching , 2001 .

[33]  SANDRA DOMINIEK,et al.  What linguists can and can't tell you about the human mind: A reply to Croft , 1998 .

[34]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  The Generative Lexicon , 1995, CL.

[35]  Claude Vandeloise,et al.  Spatial Prepositions: A Case Study from French , 1991 .

[36]  J. Grady,et al.  A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor: correlation vs. resemblance , 1999 .

[37]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[38]  Vyvyan Evans,et al.  The Structure of Time , 2003 .

[39]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Considerations of some problems of comprehension. , 1973 .

[40]  Clifford Alden Hill,et al.  Linguistic Representation of Spatial and Temporal Orientation , 1978 .

[41]  Annette Herskovits Spatial expressions and the plasticity of meaning , 1988 .

[42]  H. Grice Further Notes on Logic and Conversation , 1978 .

[43]  E. Traugott SPATIAL EXPRESSIONS OF TENSE AND TEMPORAL SEQUENCING: A CONTRIBUTION TO THE STUDY OF SEMANTIC FELDS , 1975 .

[44]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[45]  Ronald W. Langacker,et al.  Grammar and conceptualization , 1999 .

[46]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  The relation of grammar to cognition , 1986 .

[47]  G. Fauconnier,et al.  The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind''s Hidden Complexities. Basic Books , 2002 .

[48]  E. Rosch Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories. , 1975 .

[49]  J. Gumperz Discourse strategies: Subject index , 1982 .

[50]  Raymond W. Gibbs,et al.  Psycholinguistic Perspectives on Polysemy , 2001 .

[51]  J. Haiman Dictionaries and Encyclopedias , 1980 .

[52]  Robert B. Dewell,et al.  Over again: Image-schema transformations in semantic analysis , 1994 .

[53]  Paul Douglas Deane,et al.  Grammar in mind and brain : explorations in cognitive syntax , 1992 .

[54]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live By , 1980 .

[55]  G. Lakoff,et al.  More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor , 1991 .

[56]  Bernd Heine,et al.  Cognitive Foundations of Grammar , 1997 .

[57]  Christopher Johnson,et al.  Metaphor vs. conflation in the acquisition of polysemy: The case of see , 1999 .

[58]  Trevor A. Harley,et al.  The Psychology of Language , 1995 .

[59]  Hubert Cuyckens,et al.  Towards an empirical lexical semantics , 2002 .

[60]  A. Goldberg Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure , 1995 .

[61]  Susan Jean Lindner A lexico-semantic analysis of English verb particle constructions with out and up , 1981 .

[62]  Raymond W. Gibbs,et al.  The Embodied Approach to the Polysemy of the Spatial Preposition On , 2001 .

[63]  Charles Ruhl On Monosemy: A Study in Linguistic Semantics , 1989 .

[64]  E. Traugott On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change , 1989 .

[65]  Hilary Putnam,et al.  Reason, Truth and History: Contents , 1981 .

[66]  Eve Sweetser From Etymology to Pragmatics: Subject index , 1990 .

[67]  Eve Sweetser From Etymology to Pragmatics: List of abbreviations , 1990 .

[68]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  The place of perception in children's concepts ☆ , 1993 .

[69]  S. Garrod,et al.  In and on: investigating the functional geometry of spatial prepositions , 1999, Cognition.

[70]  N. Freeman,et al.  Infant search tasks reveal early concepts of containment and canonical usage of objects , 1980, Cognition.

[71]  P. D. Eimas,et al.  Evidence for Representations of Perceptually Similar Natural Categories by 3-Month-Old and 4-Month-Old Infants , 1993, Perception.

[72]  J. Mandler How to build a baby: II. Conceptual primitives. , 1992, Psychological review.

[73]  Michael J. Reddy Metaphor and Thought: The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language , 1993 .

[74]  Renee L Baillargeon,et al.  Location memory in 8-month-old infants in a non-search AB task: Further evidence , 1989 .

[75]  G. Lakoff The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor , 1993 .

[76]  E. D. Perry,et al.  A Sanskrit Reader: with Vocabulary and Notes . By Charles Rockwell Lanman, Professor of Sanskrit in Harvard College. Parts I and II. (Text and Vocabulary), 1884. Part III. (Notes), 1888. Boston, Ginn & Co. , 1889, The Classical Review.

[77]  D. Bolinger The phrasal verb in English , 1974 .

[78]  M. Turner The literary mind. , 1997 .

[79]  C. Fillmore,et al.  Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone , 1988 .

[80]  Seth Lindstromberg,et al.  English Prepositions Explained , 1998 .

[81]  Joseph Hilferty Through as a means to metaphor , 1999 .

[82]  A. Wierzbicka Semantics: Primes and Universals , 1996 .

[83]  Marcella Frank,et al.  Modern English;: A practical reference guide , 1972 .

[84]  G. Fauconnier Mappings in thought and language , 1997 .

[85]  Eve V. Clark,et al.  Non-linguistic strategies and the acquisition of word meanings , 1973 .

[86]  Dominiek Sandra,et al.  Prepositional semantics and the fragile link between space and time , 1999 .

[87]  D. Larsen-Freeman,et al.  The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher's Course , 1983 .

[88]  Ray Jackendoff Semantics and Cognition , 1983 .

[89]  A. Leslie Infant perception of a manual pick-up event. , 1984 .

[90]  George Lakoff,et al.  Cognitive Topology and Lexical Networks , 1988 .

[91]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World , 1994 .

[92]  Elizabeth M. O'Dowd Prepositions and Particles in English: A Discourse-functional Account , 1998 .

[93]  Eve Sweetser,et al.  From Etymology to Pragmatics: Preface , 1990 .

[94]  Eve Sweetser Language and conceptualization: Role and individual interpretations of change predicates , 1997 .

[95]  Günter Radden,et al.  Metonymy in language and thought , 1999 .

[96]  Hilary Putnam,et al.  Reason, Truth and History. , 1985 .

[97]  Andrea Tyler,et al.  Reconsidering Prepositional Polysemy Networks: The Case of Over , 2001 .

[98]  M. Bowerman Learning how to structure space for language: A crosslinguistic perspective , 1996 .

[99]  J. Grady THEORIES ARE BUILDINGS revisited , 1997 .

[100]  C. Vandeloise Methodology and analyses of the preposition in , 1994 .

[101]  D. Rumelhart NOTES ON A SCHEMA FOR STORIES , 1975 .

[102]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind , 1988 .

[103]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance: Communication and Cognition , 1989 .

[104]  M. Bowerman,et al.  Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns , 1991, Cognition.

[105]  Frank Brisard,et al.  The English Tense-System as an Epistemic Category , 1997 .

[106]  J. Grady Foundations of meaning : primary metaphors and primary scenes , 1997 .

[107]  Ronald W. Langacker,et al.  Assessing the cognitive linguistic enterprise , 1999 .

[108]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  How Language Structures Space , 1983 .