A de novo protein binding pair by computational design and directed evolution.

The de novo design of protein-protein interfaces is a stringent test of our understanding of the principles underlying protein-protein interactions and would enable unique approaches to biological and medical challenges. Here we describe a motif-based method to computationally design protein-protein complexes with native-like interface composition and interaction density. Using this method we designed a pair of proteins, Prb and Pdar, that heterodimerize with a Kd of 130 nM, 1000-fold tighter than any previously designed de novo protein-protein complex. Directed evolution identified two point mutations that improve affinity to 180 pM. Crystal structures of an affinity-matured complex reveal binding is entirely through the designed interface residues. Surprisingly, in the in vitro evolved complex one of the partners is rotated 180° relative to the original design model, yet still maintains the central computationally designed hotspot interaction and preserves the character of many peripheral interactions. This work demonstrates that high-affinity protein interfaces can be created by designing complementary interaction surfaces on two noninteracting partners and underscores remaining challenges.

[1]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Conformational diversity and protein evolution--a 60-year-old hypothesis revisited. , 2003, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[2]  A. Lim,et al.  Directed evolution of high-affinity antibody mimics using mRNA display. , 2002, Chemistry & biology.

[3]  Daniel C. Desrosiers,et al.  The ankyrin repeat as molecular architecture for protein recognition , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[4]  J. Skolnick,et al.  TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[5]  Cynthia Wolberger,et al.  The Structure of GABPα/β: An ETS Domain- Ankyrin Repeat Heterodimer Bound to DNA , 1998 .

[6]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Enzyme promiscuity: evolutionary and mechanistic aspects. , 2006, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[7]  T. Clackson,et al.  Structural and functional analysis of the 1:1 growth hormone:receptor complex reveals the molecular basis for receptor affinity. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  B. Crane,et al.  Effects of interface mutations on association modes and electron-transfer rates between proteins , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  S. Radford,et al.  Optimizing protein stability in vivo. , 2009, Molecular cell.

[10]  James R. Apgar,et al.  Predicting helix orientation for coiled‐coil dimers , 2008, Proteins.

[11]  Frances H Arnold,et al.  Corrigendum: Dual selection enhances the signaling specificity of a variant of the quorum-sensing transcriptional activator LuxR , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[12]  Amy E Keating,et al.  A synthetic coiled-coil interactome provides heterospecific modules for molecular engineering. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[13]  R. Russell,et al.  The relationship between sequence and interaction divergence in proteins. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  D. Baker,et al.  Realistic protein–protein association rates from a simple diffusional model neglecting long‐range interactions, free energy barriers, and landscape ruggedness , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[15]  Andreas Plückthun,et al.  Allosteric inhibition of aminoglycoside phosphotransferase by a designed ankyrin repeat protein. , 2005, Structure.

[16]  Melvin I Simon,et al.  In different organisms, the mode of interaction between two signaling proteins is not necessarily conserved. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Tanja Kortemme,et al.  Backbone flexibility in computational protein design. , 2009, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[18]  Thomas Szyperski,et al.  Computational design of a PAK1 binding protein. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  T. Sosnick,et al.  Principal determinants leading to transition state formation of a protein–protein complex, orientation trumps side-chain interactions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  D. Baker,et al.  A large scale test of computational protein design: folding and stability of nine completely redesigned globular proteins. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  D. Baker,et al.  Design of a Novel Globular Protein Fold with Atomic-Level Accuracy , 2003, Science.

[22]  A. Bogan,et al.  Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  Gevorg Grigoryan,et al.  Design of protein-interaction specificity affords selective bZIP-binding peptides , 2009, Nature.

[24]  D. M. Brown,et al.  An approach to random mutagenesis of DNA using mixtures of triphosphate derivatives of nucleoside analogues. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  Pedro Alexandrino Fernandes,et al.  Computational alanine scanning mutagenesis—An improved methodological approach , 2007, J. Comput. Chem..

[26]  Tanja Kortemme,et al.  Computer-aided design of functional protein interactions. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[27]  S. Vajda,et al.  Anchor residues in protein-protein interactions. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Gevorg Grigoryan,et al.  Structure-based prediction of bZIP partnering specificity. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  Nir London,et al.  Funnel hunting in a rough terrain: learning and discriminating native energy funnels. , 2008, Structure.

[30]  P. Chakrabarti,et al.  Conservation and relative importance of residues across protein-protein interfaces , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Peer Bork,et al.  SMART 5: domains in the context of genomes and networks , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[32]  Jie Liang,et al.  Protein-protein interactions: hot spots and structurally conserved residues often locate in complemented pockets that pre-organized in the unbound states: implications for docking. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[33]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Taking geometry to its edge: Fast unbound rigid (and hinge‐bent) docking , 2003, Proteins.

[34]  Julia M. Shifman,et al.  Modulating calmodulin binding specificity through computational protein design. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[35]  D. Baker,et al.  RosettaHoles: Rapid assessment of protein core packing for structure prediction, refinement, design, and validation , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[36]  D. Baker,et al.  High-resolution Structural and Thermodynamic Analysis of Extreme Stabilization of Human Procarboxypeptidase by Computational Protein Design , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[37]  D. Baker,et al.  Computational redesign of protein-protein interaction specificity , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[38]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  The 'evolvability' of promiscuous protein functions , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[39]  T. Clackson,et al.  A hot spot of binding energy in a hormone-receptor interface , 1995, Science.

[40]  A. Kapila,et al.  Picomolar affinity fibronectin domains engineered utilizing loop length diversity, recursive mutagenesis, and loop shuffling. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  A. Plückthun,et al.  Efficient selection of DARPins with sub-nanomolar affinities using SRP phage display. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[42]  Pasch,et al.  References and Notes Supporting Online Material Evolution of Hormone-receptor Complexity by Molecular Exploitation , 2022 .

[43]  C. Roy,et al.  Ankyrin Repeat Proteins Comprise a Diverse Family of Bacterial Type IV Effectors , 2008, Science.

[44]  A. Plückthun,et al.  Engineering novel binding proteins from nonimmunoglobulin domains , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[45]  Stephen L Mayo,et al.  A de novo designed protein–protein interface , 2007, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[46]  Chun Tang,et al.  Characterizing dynamic protein-protein interactions using differentially scaled paramagnetic relaxation enhancement. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[47]  Yang Zhang,et al.  MM-align: a quick algorithm for aligning multiple-chain protein complex structures using iterative dynamic programming , 2009, Nucleic acids research.