The Community of Inquiry framework meets the SOLO taxonomy: a process‐product model of online learning

This paper presents both a conceptual and empirical investigation of teaching and learning in online courses. Employing both the Community of Inquiry framework (CoI) and the Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes (SOLO) taxonomy, two complete online courses were examined for the quality of both collaborative learning processes and learning outcomes. The study examines evidence beyond learner reported satisfaction and learning, instead measuring both learning inputs and outcomes. Analysis of input includes quantitative content analysis of discussions using the CoI framework. Analysis of outcomes looks at both the quality of student learning artifacts such as case studies using the SOLO taxonomy as well as instructor‐assigned grades of specific related assignments. Results suggest that understanding of online instructional effort, processes, and learning outcomes can be improved through this more comprehensive, conceptually driven approach.

[1]  K. Holmes,et al.  Analysis of asynchronous online discussion using the SOLO Taxonomy , 2005 .

[2]  I. E. Allen,et al.  Online Nation: Five Years of Growth in Online Learning. , 2007 .

[3]  D. Garrison,et al.  Assessing Social Presence In Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing , 1999 .

[4]  T. Waits.  Distance Education at Degree-Granting Postsecondary Institutions: 2000-2001. E.D. Tabs. , 2003 .

[5]  J. Dewey.  How we think : a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process , 1934 .

[6]  T. Anderson,et al.  Online Social Interchange, Discord, and Knowledge Construction , 1998 .

[7]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective , 2010, Internet High. Educ..

[8]  Martha Cleveland-Innes,et al.  Revisiting methodological issues in transcript analysis: Negotiated coding and reliability , 2006, Internet High. Educ..

[9]  Dc Washington,et al.  Distance education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions: (NCES -044). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education for Education Statistics. , 2009 .

[10]  D. Garrison,et al.  Facilitating Cognitive Presence in Online Learning: Interaction Is Not Enough , 2005 .

[11]  Karen Swan,et al.  Community of Inquiry Framework: Validation and instrument development , 2008 .

[12]  Karen Swan,et al.  The community of inquiry framework ten years later: Introduction to the special issue , 2010, Internet High. Educ..

[13]  M. Lipman.  Thinking in Education , 1992 .

[14]  Heather Kanuka,et al.  Learning in Communities of Inquiry: A Review of the Literature , 2009 .

[15]  Robert M. Bernard,et al.  How Does Distance Education Compare With Classroom Instruction? A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature , 2004 .

[16]  Yong Zhao,et al.  What Makes the Difference? A Practical Analysis of Research on the Effectiveness of Distance Education , 2005, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[17]  Hilda R. Glazer,et al.  Creating shared understanding through chats in a community of inquiry , 2007, Internet High. Educ..

[18]  L. Shulman.  Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[19]  M. Allen,et al.  Comparing Student Satisfaction With Distance Education to Traditional Classrooms in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis , 2002 .

[20]  Heather Kanuka,et al.  The influence of instructional methods on the quality of online discussion , 2006, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[21]  Frances Slack,et al.  Assessment and Learning Outcomes: The Evaluation of Deep Learning in an On-line Course , 2003, J. Inf. Technol. Educ..

[22]  Terry Anderson,et al.  Exploring Social Communication in Computer Conferencing , 2002 .

[23]  Robert Blomeyer,et al.  The Effects of Distance Education on K-12 Student Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. , 2004 .

[24]  Peter Shea,et al.  Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster "epistemic engagement" and "cognitive presence" in online education , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[25]  Cameron Richards,et al.  Technoliteracy and learning: An analysis of the quality of knowledge in electronic representations of understanding , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[26]  M. Pritchard.  Thinking in Education , 1993 .

[27]  Kevin F. Collis,et al.  Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy , 1977 .

[28]  Peter Shea,et al.  Measures of Quality in Online Education: An Investigation of the Community of Inquiry Model and the Net Generation , 2008 .

[29]  D. Garrison,et al.  Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education , 2001 .

[30]  I. E. Allen,et al.  Class Differences Online Education in the United States, 2010 , 2010 .

[31]  D. Garrison,et al.  Methodological Issues in the Content Analysis of Computer Conference Transcripts , 2007 .

[32]  I. E. Allen,et al.  Staying the course: online education in the United States, 2008 , 2008 .

[33]  J. Dewey,et al.  How We Think , 2009 .

[34]  Mary K. Tallent-Runnels,et al.  Teaching Courses Online: A Review of the Research , 2006 .

[35]  D. Garrison,et al.  Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions , 2007, Internet High. Educ..

[36]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Creating cognitive presence in a blended faculty development community , 2005, Internet High. Educ..

[37]  Barbara Means,et al.  Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies , 2009 .

[38]  F. Maloberti,et al.  What Makes the Difference? , 2013, IEEE Solid-State Circuits Magazine.

[39]  Tom McKlin,et al.  Cognitive Presence in Web-Based Learning: A Content Analysis of Students' Online Discussions. , 2001 .

[40]  S. Schrire.  Interaction and cognition in asynchronous computer conferencing , 2004 .

[41]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[42]  C. Peirce,et al.  The Fixation of Belief , 2011, Philosophy after Darwin.

[43]  Patrick J. Fahy.  Two methods for assessing critical thinking in computer-mediated communications (CMC) transcripts. , 2005 .