Static and temporal gravity field recovery using grace potential difference observables

Abstract. The gravity field dedicated satellite missions like CHAMP, GRACE, and GOCE are supposed to map the Earth’s global gravity field with unprecedented accuracy and resolution. New models of Earth’s static and time-variable gravity field will be available every month as one of the science products from GRACE. Here we present an alternative method to estimate the gravity field efficiently using the in situ satellite-to-satellite observations at the altitude and show results on static as well as temporal gravity field recovery. Considering the energy relation between the kinetic energy of the satellite and the gravitational potential, the disturbing potential difference observations can be computed from the orbital parameter vectors in the inertial frame, using the high-low GPS-LEO GPS tracking data, the low-low satelliteto- satellite GRACE measurements, and data from 3-axis accelerometers (Jekeli, 1999). The disturbing potential observation also includes other potentials due to tides, atmosphere, other modeled signals (e.g. N-body) and the geophysical fluid signals (hydrological and oceanic mass variations), which should be recoverable from GRACE mission with a monthly resolution. The simulation results confirm that monthly geoid accuracy is expected to be a few cm with the 160 km resolution (up to degree and order 120) once other corrections are made accurately. The time-variable geoids (ocean and ground water mass) might be recovered with a noise-to-signal ratio of 0.1 with the resolution of 800 km every month assuming no temporal aliasing. Key words. GRACE mission, Energy integral, Geopotential, Satellite-to-satellite tracking, Temporal gravity field

[1]  Nico Sneeuw,et al.  A first attempt at time variable gravity recovery from CHAMP using the energy balance approach , 2003 .

[2]  C. Jekeli The determination of gravitational potential differences from satellite-to-satellite tracking , 1999 .

[3]  C. Hwang Gravity recovery using COSMIC GPS data: application of orbital perturbation theory , 2001 .

[4]  J. B. Thomas,et al.  The GRACE Mission: Meeting the Technical Challenges , 1999 .

[5]  Nico Sneeuw,et al.  Energy integral method for gravity field determination from satellite orbit coordinates , 2003 .

[6]  C. Wagner Direct determination of gravitational harmonics from low‐low GRAVSAT data , 1983 .

[7]  M. Watkins,et al.  Error Analysis of the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) Mission , 2001 .

[8]  C. Readings,et al.  Gravity field and steady-state ocean circulation mission , 1996 .

[9]  Local geoid determination with in situ geopotential data obtained from satellite-to-satellite tracking , 2001 .

[10]  Nico Sneeuw,et al.  CHAMP Gravity Field Recovery with the Energy Balance Approach: First Results , 2003 .

[11]  Geoid Heights, Geoid Height Differences, and Mean Gravity Anomalies from 'Low-Low' Satellite-to-Satellite Tracking - An Error Analysis, , 1980 .

[12]  Christopher Jekeli,et al.  Accuracy of the determination of mean anomalies and mean geoid undulations from a satellite gravity field mapping mission , 1980 .

[13]  R. Koop,et al.  Efficient gravity field recovery from GOCE gravity gradient observations , 2000 .

[14]  F. Bryan,et al.  Time variability of the Earth's gravity field: Hydrological and oceanic effects and their possible detection using GRACE , 1998 .

[15]  Christopher Jekeli,et al.  Efficient gravity field recovery using in situ disturbing potential observables from CHAMP , 2002 .