An Evaluation of the Accuracy and Performance of Lightweight GPS Collars in a Suburban Environment

The recent development of lightweight GPS collars has enabled medium-to-small sized animals to be tracked via GPS telemetry. Evaluation of the performance and accuracy of GPS collars is largely confined to devices designed for large animals for deployment in natural environments. This study aimed to assess the performance of lightweight GPS collars within a suburban environment, which may be different from natural environments in a way that is relevant to satellite signal acquisition. We assessed the effects of vegetation complexity, sky availability (percentage of clear sky not obstructed by natural or artificial features of the environment), proximity to buildings, and satellite geometry on fix success rate (FSR) and location error (LE) for lightweight GPS collars within a suburban environment. Sky availability had the largest affect on FSR, while LE was influenced by sky availability, vegetation complexity, and HDOP (Horizontal Dilution of Precision). Despite the complexity and modified nature of suburban areas, values for FSR ( = 90.6%) and LE ( = 30.1 m) obtained within the suburban environment are comparable to those from previous evaluations of GPS collars designed for larger animals and within less built-up environments. Due to fine-scale patchiness of habitat within urban environments, it is recommended that resource selection methods that are not reliant on buffer sizes be utilised for selection studies.

[1]  Gordon B. Stenhouse,et al.  Removing GPS collar bias in habitat selection studies , 2004 .

[2]  I. Hulbert,et al.  The accuracy of GPS for wildlife telemetry and habitat mapping , 2001 .

[3]  M. Hebblewhite,et al.  Distinguishing technology from biology: a critical review of the use of GPS telemetry data in ecology , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  Stan Lipovetsky,et al.  Generalized Latent Variable Modeling: Multilevel,Longitudinal, and Structural Equation Models , 2005, Technometrics.

[5]  Claire Freeman,et al.  Development of an ecological mapping methodology for urban areas in New Zealand , 2003 .

[6]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[7]  Arthur R. Rodgers,et al.  PERFORMANCE OF A GPS ANIMAL LOCATION SYSTEM UNDER BOREAL FOREST CANOPY , 1995 .

[8]  Francesca Cagnacci,et al.  Resolving issues of imprecise and habitat-biased locations in ecological analyses using GPS telemetry data , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  N. Samama.  Global Positioning: Technologies and Performance , 2008 .

[10]  P. Forer,et al.  Performance Characteristics of Small Global-Positioning-System Tracking Collars , 2010 .

[11]  P. Lemmon.  A Spherical Densiometer For Estimating Forest Overstory Density , 1956 .

[12]  P. Nagel,et al.  Suitability of using the global positioning system (GPS) for studying Feral Pigeons Columba livia in the urban habitat , 2005 .

[13]  I. B. Parnell,et al.  EVALUATION OF THE LANDSCAPE SURROUNDING NORTHERN BOBWHITE NEST SITES: A MULTISCALE ANALYSIS , 2005 .

[14]  David L. Trauger,et al.  The Feasibility of Utilizing the Cellular Infrastructure For Urban Wildlife Telemetry , 2005 .

[15]  Yosef Cohen,et al.  Effects of moose movement and habitat use on GPS collar performance , 1996 .

[16]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[17]  Lee A. Vierling,et al.  Effects of habitat on GPS collar performance: using data screening to reduce location error , 2007 .

[18]  Michael C. Hansen,et al.  Accuracy, Precision, and Observation Rates of Global Positioning System Telemetry Collars , 2008 .

[19]  Lawrence E. Band,et al.  Beyond Urban Legends: An Emerging Framework of Urban Ecology, as Illustrated by the Baltimore Ecosystem Study , 2008 .

[20]  Gordon B. Stenhouse,et al.  Uncontrolled field performance of Televilt GPS-Simplex™ collars on grizzly bears in western and northern Canada , 2004 .

[21]  Mark A. Goddard,et al.  Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[22]  Joseph Hilbe,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2009 .

[23]  Donna Delparte,et al.  Effects of radio‐collar position and orientation on GPS radio‐collar performance, and the implications of PDOP in data screening , 2005 .

[24]  R. Mathieu,et al.  Diversity of native and exotic birds across an urban gradient in a New Zealand city , 2008 .

[25]  BRUNO CARGNELUTTI,et al.  Testing Global Positioning System Performance for Wildlife Monitoring Using Mobile Collars and Known Reference Points , 2007 .

[26]  Lars Edenius,et al.  Field test of a GPS location system for moose Alces alces under Scandinavian boreal conditions , 1997, Wildlife Biology.

[27]  Paul Denys,et al.  Lightweight GPS-Tags, One Giant Leap for Wildlife Tracking? An Assessment Approach , 2011, PloS one.

[28]  Christopher O. Kochanny,et al.  GPS radiotelemetry error and bias in mountainous terrain , 2002 .

[29]  Y. Cohen,et al.  Accuracy of GPS telemetry collar locations with differential correction , 1997 .

[30]  R. Schaefer,et al.  Performance of two GPS telemetry collars under different habitat conditions , 2003 .

[31]  M. McKinney,et al.  Urbanization, Biodiversity, and Conservation , 2002 .

[32]  Mikio Sugita,et al.  Effects of habitat feature, antenna position, movement, and fix interval on GPS radio collar performance in Mount Fuji, central Japan , 2007, Ecological Research.

[33]  P. Krausman,et al.  Influence of topography and GPS fix interval on GPS collar performance , 2005 .

[34]  K. Gaston,et al.  Urban domestic gardens (X): the extent & structure of the resource in five major cities , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[35]  Helen M. Blackie.  Comparative Performance of Three Brands of Lightweight Global Positioning System Collars , 2010 .

[36]  R. Rempel,et al.  Effects of differential correction on accuracy of a GPS animal location system , 1997 .

[37]  Tabitha A. Graves,et al.  Understanding the Causes of Missed Global Positioning System Telemetry Fixes , 2006 .

[38]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[39]  Eon,et al.  Effects of a stationary GPS fix-rate BIAS on habitat-selection analyses , 2003 .

[40]  W. Suter,et al.  Performance of Gps Telemetry Collars for Red Deer Cervus Elaphus in Rugged Alpine Terrain Under Controlled and Free-living Conditions , 2007 .

[41]  Ben C. Augustine,et al.  A mechanistic model of GPS collar location data: Implications for analysis and bias mitigation , 2011 .

[42]  A. El-Rabbany.  Introduction to GPS: The Global Positioning System , 2002 .

[43]  M. Hebblewhite,et al.  Are All Global Positioning System Collars Created Equal? Correcting Habitat-Induced Bias Using Three Brands in the Central Canadian Rockies , 2007 .

[44]  R. G. Wright,et al.  Fix Success and Accuracy of Global Positioning System Collars in Old-Growth Temperate Coniferous Forests , 2007 .

[45]  R. Mathieu,et al.  Mapping private gardens in urban areas using object-oriented techniques and very high-resolution satellite imagery , 2007 .

[46]  Bruce D. Leopold,et al.  Evaluation of a GPS collar for white-tailed deer. , 2000 .

[47]  F. Cagnacci,et al.  Animal ecology meets GPS-based radiotelemetry: a perfect storm of opportunities and challenges , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  Ivar Herfindal,et al.  Screening Global Positioning System Location Data for Errors Using Animal Movement Characteristics , 2010 .