The formal architecture of Lexical Functional Grammar offers a particular formal device, the structural correspondence, for modularizing the mapping between the surface forms of a language and representations of their underlying meanings. This approach works well when the structural discrepancies between form and meaning representations are finitely bounded, but there are some phenomena in natural language, e.g. adverbs in English, where this restriction does not hold. In this paper, we describe rule-based type-driven interpretation algorithms which cover cases of such a structural misalignment by exploiting a new descriptive device, the "restriction operator". The algorithms are set up in such a way that recursive rules can be derived for the interpretation of adjunct sets within a codescription approach (see [Kaplan and Wedekind, 1993] for details).
[1]
Louisa Sadler,et al.
Structural Non-Correspondence in Translation
,
1991,
EACL.
[2]
Ronald M. Kaplan,et al.
Restriction and Correspondence-based Translation
,
1993,
EACL.
[3]
Klaus Netter,et al.
Translation by Structural Correspondences
,
1989,
EACL.
[4]
Mary Dalrymple,et al.
Modeling syntactic constraints on anaphoric binding
,
1990,
COLING.
[5]
Per-Kristian Halvorsen.
Situation Semantics and Semantic Interpretation in Constraint-Based Grammars
,
1988,
FGCS.
[6]
Stanley Peters,et al.
Cross-Serial Dependencies in Dutch
,
1982
.
[7]
M. Baltin,et al.
The Mental representation of grammatical relations
,
1985
.