Special Section: Topological representation and reasoning in design and manufacturing

The word “topology” is derived from the Greek word “τοπος,” which means “position” or “location.” A simplified and thus partial definition has often been used (Croom, 1989, page 2): “topology deals with geometric properties which are dependent only upon the relative positions of the components of figures and not upon such concepts as length, size, and magnitude.” Topology deals with those properties of an object that remain invariant under continuous transformations (specifically bending, stretching, and squeezing, but not breaking or tearing). Topological notions and methods have illuminated and clarified basic structural concepts in diverse branches of modern mathematics. However, the influence of topology extends to almost every other discipline that formerly was not considered amenable to mathematical handling. For example, topology supports design and representation of mechanical devices, communication and transportation networks, topographic maps, and planning and controlling of complex activities. In addition, aspects of topology are closely related to symbolic logic, which forms the foundation of artificial intelligence. In the same way that the Euclidean plane satisfies certain axioms or postulates, it can be shown that certain abstract spaces—where the relations of points to sets and continuity of functions are important—have definite properties that can be analyzed without examining these spaces individually. By approaching engineering design from this abstract point of view, it is possible to use topological methods to study collections of geometric objects or collections of entities that are of concern in design analysis or synthesis. These collections of objects and or entities can be treated as spaces, and the elements in them as points.

[1]  Thomas J. Peters,et al.  Topological properties that model feature-based representation conversions within concurrent engineering , 1992 .

[2]  Fritz B. Prinz,et al.  Continuous skeletons of discrete objects , 1993, Solid Modeling and Applications.

[3]  Neil F. Stewart,et al.  Sufficient condition for correct topological form in tolerance specification , 1993, Comput. Aided Des..

[4]  N. Kikuchi,et al.  Integrated topology and shape optimization in structural design , 1991 .

[5]  Vadim Shapiro,et al.  A topological model of limitations in design for manufacturing , 1994 .

[6]  B. Veth,et al.  An integrated data description language for coding design knowledge , 1989 .

[7]  Steven J. Fenves,et al.  Representing spatial abstractions of constructed facilities , 1992 .

[8]  Christoph M. Hoffmann,et al.  Geometric and Solid Modeling: An Introduction , 1989 .

[9]  Tetsuo Tomiyama,et al.  From general design theory to knowledge-intensive engineering , 1994, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[10]  M. Boyer,et al.  Modeling Spaces for Toleranced Objects , 1991, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[11]  Michael J. Wozny,et al.  Geometric Modeling for Product Realization, Selected and Expanded Papers from the IFIP TC5/WG5.2 Working Conference on Geometric Modeling, Rensselaerville, NY, USA, 27 September - 1 October 1992 , 1992, Geometric Modeling.

[12]  N. F. Stewart,et al.  Imperfect Form Tolerancing on Manifold Objects: A Metric Approach , 1992 .

[13]  Vadim Shapiro,et al.  On the role of geometry in mechanical design , 1989 .

[14]  Tetsuo Tomiyama,et al.  Representing knowledge in two distinct descriptions: Extensional vs. intensional , 1990, Artif. Intell. Eng..

[15]  J. Dixon,et al.  Automating extrusion design: a case study in geometric and topological reasoning for mechanical design , 1988 .

[16]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  An improved shape annealing algorithm for truss topology , 1995 .

[17]  TakedaHideaki,et al.  Modeling design processes , 1990 .

[18]  David W. Rosen,et al.  The role of topology in engineering design research , 1996 .

[19]  Warren P. Seering,et al.  Synthesis of schematic descriptions in mechanical design , 1989 .

[20]  Beth E Allen Approximating geometric designs with simple material removal processes and CAD/CAM tools , 1999 .

[21]  Oded Maimon,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Design: Foundations, Algorithms and Applications , 1998 .

[22]  Tetsuo Tomiyama,et al.  Extended general design theory , 1986 .

[23]  Aristides A. G. Requicha,et al.  Toward a Theory of Geometric Tolerancing , 1983 .

[24]  Richard S. Palmer Chain models and finite element analysis: An executable formulation of plane stress , 1995, Comput. Aided Geom. Des..

[25]  Toshiharu Taura,et al.  A Metric Space for Intelligent CAD , 1991, IntCAD.

[26]  Vadim Shapiro,et al.  Chain models of physical behavior for engineering analysis and design , 1993 .

[27]  Yoram Reich,et al.  A critical review of General Design Theory , 1995 .

[28]  Neil F. Stewart,et al.  An extension of manifold boundary representations to the r-sets , 1992, TOGS.

[29]  Michael J. Wozny,et al.  A topology-based approach for sell-closure , 1992, Geometric Modeling.