Wildfire Spread Prediction and Assimilation for FARSITE Using Ensemble Kalman Filtering

This paper extends FARSITE (a software used for wildfire modeling and simulation) to incorporate data assimilation techniques based on noisy and limited spatial resolution observations of the fire perimeter to improve the accuracy of wildfire spread predictions. To include data assimilation in FARSITE, uncertainty on both the simulated fire perimeter and the measured fire perimeter is used to formulate optimal updates for the prediction of the spread of the wild- fire. For data assimilation, fire perimeter measurements with limited spatial resolution and a known uncertainty are used to formulate an optimal adjustment in the fire perimeter prediction. The adjustment is calculated from the Kalman filter gain in an Ensemble Kalman filter that exploits the uncertainty information on both the simulated fire perimeter and the measured fire perimeter. The approach is illustrated on a wildfire simulation representing the 2014 Cocos fire and presents comparison results for hourly data assimilation results.

[1]  F. Albini Estimating Wildfire Behavior and Effects , 1976 .

[2]  Warren B. Powell,et al.  The Effect of Robust Decisions on the Cost of Uncertainty in Military Airlift Operations , 2011, TOMC.

[3]  Xiaolin Hu,et al.  Data assimilation using sequential monte carlo methods in wildfire spread simulation , 2012, TOMC.

[4]  G. Evensen Data Assimilation: The Ensemble Kalman Filter , 2006 .

[5]  Geir Evensen,et al.  The Ensemble Kalman Filter: theoretical formulation and practical implementation , 2003 .

[6]  R. Rothermel A Mathematical Model for Predicting Fire Spread in Wildland Fuels , 2017 .

[7]  Jonathan D. Beezley,et al.  Data driven computing by the morphing fast Fourier transform ensemble Kalman filter in epidemic spread simulations , 2010, ICCS.

[8]  Joe H. Scott,et al.  Standard Fire Behavior Fuel Models: A Comprehensive Set for Use with Rothermel?s Surface Fire Spread Model , 2015 .

[9]  H. Anderson Aids to Determining Fuel Models for Estimating Fire Behavior , 1982 .

[10]  C. E. Van Wagner,et al.  Conditions for the start and spread of crown fire , 1977 .

[11]  Todd Hansen,et al.  Wireless Measurement and Analysis on HPWREN , 2001 .

[12]  R. Rothermel,et al.  Predicting Behavior and Size of Crown Fires in the Northern Rocky Mountains , 2018 .

[13]  Arnaud Trouvé,et al.  Towards predictive data-driven simulations of wildfire spread - Part II: Ensemble Kalman Filter for the state estimation of a front-tracking simulator of wildfire spread , 2014 .

[14]  Wei Zhao,et al.  A Note on Dynamic Data Driven Wildfire Modeling , 2004, International Conference on Computational Science.

[15]  Guan Qin,et al.  Towards a Dynamic Data Driven Application System for Wildfire Simulation , 2005, International Conference on Computational Science.

[16]  John Brakeall,et al.  Wildfire Assessment Using FARSITE Fire Modeling: A Case Study in the Chihuahua Desert of Mexico , 2013 .

[17]  Minjeong Kim,et al.  Data assimilation for wildland fires , 2007, IEEE Control Systems.

[18]  R. M. Nelson,et al.  Prediction of diurnal change in 10-h fuel stick moisture content , 2000 .

[19]  M. Finney FARSITE : Fire Area Simulator : model development and evaluation , 1998 .

[20]  D. Bernstein,et al.  What is the ensemble Kalman filter and how well does it work? , 2006, 2006 American Control Conference.

[21]  Jonathan D. Beezley,et al.  An Ensemble Kalman-Particle Predictor-Corrector Filter for Non-Gaussian Data Assimilation , 2008, ICCS.

[22]  Didier Lucor,et al.  Interactive comment on “Towards predictive data-driven simulations of wildfire spread – Part I: Reduced-cost Ensemble Kalman Filter based on a Polynomial Chaos surrogate model for parameter estimation” , 2014 .