Blind Modulation Classification under Non-Gaussian Noise via Radio Frequency Analytics

Blind modulation classification has emerged as a promising technology in many military and civilian applications, such as cognitive radios, satellite systems, etc. However, it is very challenging to support this blind mechanism within non-Gaussian noise environments, which recently have been identified in a variety of electromagnetic communication networks. Also, start-of-the-art classification methods are mainly based on neural networks or deep learning, which inevitably induces heavy computation loads and thus cannot proactively learn from wireless data in real time. To address the challenges, this paper introduces a series of low- computation radio frequency analytics, including generalized cyclic spectrum (GCS), principal component analysis (PCA), and support vector machine (SVM), which enables the blind modulation classification under non-Gaussian noise. First, based on raw sensory signals and the designed bounded nonlinear function, GCS is extracted as the radio frequency feature to facilitate discrimination of modulation schemes. This GCS can also effectively suppress the burstiness impact of non-Gaussian noise. Then, PCA method is adopted to optimally reduce the dimensionality of GCS features, and a simple and efficient SVM classifier is employed to identify the exact modulation of received signals. Both Monte Carlo simulations and real- data experiments confirm that the proposed design outperforms existing solutions with higher classification accuracy and robustness, i.e., at least 13\% improvement of recognition accuracy in very low (-2 dB) generalized signal-to-noise ratio scenario.

[1]  Shih-Chun Lin,et al.  Automatic Modulation Classification Under Non-Gaussian Noise: A Deep Residual Learning Approach , 2019, ICC 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[2]  Claudio R. C. M. da Silva,et al.  Classification of Digital Amplitude-Phase Modulated Signals in Time-Correlated Non-Gaussian Channels , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[3]  Madhusmita Mohanty,et al.  Cyclostationary Features Based Modulation Classification in Presence of Non Gaussian Noise Using Sparse Signal Decomposition , 2017, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[4]  Fanggang Wang,et al.  Fast and Robust Modulation Classification via Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[5]  T. Charles Clancy,et al.  Over-the-Air Deep Learning Based Radio Signal Classification , 2017, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[6]  Shih-Chun Lin,et al.  End-to-End Network Slicing for 5G&B Wireless Software-Defined Systems , 2018, 2018 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[7]  Tianshuang Qiu,et al.  BNC-based projection approximation subspace tracking under impulsive noise , 2017 .

[8]  Kwang-Cheng Chen,et al.  Improving Spectrum Efficiency via In-Network Computations in Cognitive Radio Sensor Networks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[9]  Tianshuang Qiu,et al.  Automatic Modulation Classification Using Cyclic Correntropy Spectrum in Impulsive Noise , 2019, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[10]  Eric Pierre Simon,et al.  Blind Digital Modulation Identification for MIMO Systems in Railway Environments With High-Speed Channels and Impulsive Noise , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[11]  Ali Abdi,et al.  Survey of automatic modulation classification techniques: classical approaches and new trends , 2007, IET Commun..

[12]  Konstantinos N. Plataniotis,et al.  An Accurate Kernelized Energy Detection in Gaussian and non-Gaussian/Impulsive Noises , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[13]  Asoke K. Nandi,et al.  Automatic Modulation Classification Using Combination of Genetic Programming and KNN , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[14]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Magnetic Induction-Based Localization in Randomly Deployed Wireless Underground Sensor Networks , 2017, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.