Do Security Analysts Exhibit Persistent Differences in Stock Picking Ability

We investigate if sell-side security analysts exhibit relative persistence in their stock picking ability. We find that analysts whose recommendation revisions earned the most (least) positive excess returns in the past continue to outperform (underperform) other analysts in the future. Further, we find that the market recognizes these performance differences in the five-day period surrounding the recommendation revision. This market reaction, however, is incomplete. Excess returns measured over the one and three trading months following the revision are significantly different from zero and positively associated with the analysts' prior performance. A trading strategy taking long (short) positions in recommendation upgrades (downgrades) conditional on an analyst's prior performance generates excess returns, but these returns are insufficient to cover transaction costs.

[1]  Jennifer Francis,et al.  The relative informativeness of analysts' stock recommendations and earnings forecast revisions , 1997 .

[2]  Andrew Metrick,et al.  Performance Evaluation with Transactions Data: the Stock Selection of Investment Newsletters , 1998 .

[3]  M. Degroot,et al.  Probability and Statistics , 2021, Examining an Operational Approach to Teaching Probability.

[4]  Josef Lakonishok,et al.  The Structure and Performance of the Money Management Industry , 1992 .

[5]  Brad M. Barber,et al.  Can Investors Profit from the Prophets? Consensus Analyst Recommendations and Stock Returns , 1998 .

[6]  H. White.  A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[7]  Kent L. Womack.  Do Brokerage Analysts' Recommendations Have Investment Value? , 1996 .

[8]  R. H. Willis,et al.  Do security analysts improve their performance with experience , 1997 .

[9]  E. Fama,et al.  Risk, Return, and Equilibrium , 1971, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  R. H. Willis,et al.  Does Forecast Accuracy Matter to Security Analysts , 1999 .

[11]  P. J. Huber.  The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions , 1967 .

[12]  Donald B. Keim,et al.  The Cost of Institutional Equity Trades , 1998 .

[13]  Jeffrey D. Kubik,et al.  Analyzing the Analysts: Career Concerns and Biased Earnings Forecasts , 2003 .

[14]  Richard G. Sloan.  Do Stock Prices Fully Reflect Information in Accruals and Cash Flows About Future Earnings , 1998 .

[15]  Kent D. Daniel,et al.  Measuring mutual fund performance with characteristic-based benchmarks , 1997 .

[16]  J. Graham,et al.  Herding Among Investment Newsletters: Theory and Evidence , 1998 .

[17]  Narasimhan Jegadeesh,et al.  Evidence of Predictable Behavior of Security Returns , 1990 .

[18]  Richard J. Zeckhauser,et al.  Hot Hands in Mutual Funds: Short‐Run Persistence of Relative Performance, 1974–1988 , 1993 .

[19]  L. Brown,et al.  A Re-Examination of Financial Analysts' Differential Earnings Forecast Accuracy , 1997 .

[20]  Glenn Ellison,et al.  Are some mutual fund managers better than others , 1999 .

[21]  Scott E. Stickel.  The Anatomy of the Performance of Buy and Sell Recommendations , 1995 .

[22]  Sanford J. Grossman.  On the Impossibility of Informationally Efficient Markets , 1980 .

[23]  Cristi A. Gleason,et al.  Analyst Forecast Revisions and Market Price Discovery , 2003 .

[24]  E. Fama,et al.  Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests , 1973, Journal of Political Economy.

[25]  W. Newey,et al.  A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelationconsistent Covariance Matrix , 1986 .

[26]  I. Welch.  Herding among security analysts , 2000 .

[27]  Russ Wermers,et al.  Mutual Fund Performance: An Empirical Decomposition into Stock-Picking Talent, Style, Transactions Costs, and Expenses , 2000 .

[28]  Mark M. Carhart.  On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance , 1997 .

[29]  P. C. O'brien.  Forecast accuracy of individual analysts in nine industries , 1990 .