Higher Cortical Function Deficits After Stroke: An Analysis of 1,000 Patients from a Dedicated Cognitive Stroke Registry

Objective: Despite spectacular success of animal model neuroprotective therapy in stroke, these agents have been uniformly unsuccessful in humans. One possible ex planation is the crudity of cerebral measurement by insensitive of stroke scales com prising scant or absent higher cortical-function parameters and the heterogeneity of stroke syndromes and etiology. We sought to determine the frequency and extent of cognitive disorders after stroke and their relation to stroke risk factors, syndromes, le sion site, and etiology. Methods: We used hospital-based consecutive stroke cases. A tiered, hierarchic, cerebrovascular investigative protocol and a battery of predefined, validated bedside higher cortical function deficit (HCFD) tests with comparison to neuropsychological. Quantification according to the World Health Organization lev els of disease model was achieved by a clinical neurologic deficit scale, etiologic scale, and disability scale. Results: Stroke deficit, disability and etiology: In patients evaluated (n = 1,000), the admission Canadian Neurological Scale deficit grading was mild, 11.5-9.5 (n = 696); moderate, 9.5-5.5 (n = 204); and severe, 5.0-0 (n = 86); with correlation to Rankin scale of independent (n = 467), mild disability (n = 345) and severe disability (n = 174) with moderate agreement (kappa = 0.54) between the two measurements. The etiologic subtypes included large-vessel atherothrombosis (n = 264), small-vessel atherothrombosis (n = 262), cardioembolic (n = 122), other (dis section, vasculitis, prothrombotic states; n = 253), and unknown (n = 99). Cognitive Data: 1. One or more higher cortical function abnormalities was detected in 607 (63.5%) of 955 nondrowsy patients. The most numerous categories were aphasias (25.2%), apraxias (14.5%), amnesias (11.6%), and frontal network syndromes (9.2%), with the other categories less frequent (3%). Cognitive impairment occurred without elementary neurologic deficits (motor, sensory, or visual impairment) in 137 (22.5%) of 608. The cardloembolic, other, and unknown stroke mechanistic groups differed sig nificantly from the other groups in terms of HCFD (p = 0.01) frequency. HCFD did not differ between younger (younger than 49 years) and older patients (p = 0.194). 3. Univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors and likelihood of developing an HCFD revealed increasing age, black race, being overweight, and recent infection to be independent variables (p = 0.05). 4. In 76 patients, neuropsychological testing was performed and comparison with the HCFD test revealed a sensitivity of 80.2% (CI, 72-88%) and specificity of 100%. Conclusions: 1. Cognitive impairment is pres ent in the majority of all types of stroke. 2. Cognitive impairment may be the sole pres entation of stroke, unaccompanied by long-tract signs. 3. Stroke etiologic subtype dif fered significantly among the subgroups, but in comparison of young versus older patients, no significant differences in HCFD frequency were recorded. 4. Risk factors for developing cognitive impairment in the indigenous stroke population included increasing age, black race, overweight body habitus, and recent infection. Key Words: Stroke—Cognitive deficit—Higher cortical function.

[1]  J. Bamford,et al.  Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction , 1991, The Lancet.

[2]  E. Renzi,et al.  The Incidence of Aphasia and Global Aphasia in Left Brain-Damaged Patients , 1987, Cortex.

[3]  J. Rankin Cerebral Vascular Accidents in Patients over the Age of 60: II. Prognosis , 1957, Scottish medical journal.

[4]  R. Zupping,et al.  Epidemiology of Cerebrovascular Disease in Tartu, Estonia, USSR, 1970 Through 1973 , 1976, Stroke.

[5]  A. Damasio,et al.  Age and type of aphasia in patients with stroke. , 1981, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[6]  N B Lincoln,et al.  Behavioural mapping of patients on a stroke unit. , 1989, International disability studies.

[7]  Daniel B Hier,et al.  The Stroke Data Bank: design, methods, and baseline characteristics. , 1988, Stroke.

[8]  V Hachinski,et al.  The Canadian Neurological Scale , 1989, Neurology.

[9]  A. Benton,et al.  Frontal Lobe Function and Dysfunction , 1991 .

[10]  A. Damasio,et al.  The frontal lobes , 1993 .

[11]  D. Grobbee,et al.  The CAMCOG: a useful screening instrument for dementia in stroke patients. , 1998, Stroke.

[12]  M. Finlayson Neuropsychological Assessment and Treatment of Stroke Patients An Overview , 1990, Stroke.

[13]  G. Andersen,et al.  Intellectual Impairment in the First Year following Stroke, Compared to an Age-Matched Population Sample , 1996 .

[14]  J. Mohr Acute Clinical Trials: An Expression of Concern , 1999, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[15]  J. Bogousslavsky,et al.  The Lausanne Stroke Registry: analysis of 1,000 consecutive patients with first stroke. , 1988, Stroke.

[16]  R L Hewer,et al.  Aphasia after stroke: natural history and associated deficits. , 1986, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[17]  J. Mohr,et al.  Stroke data banks. , 1986, Stroke.

[18]  First year after stroke: tracking cognitive and affective deficits. , 1989, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  L. Kurland,et al.  Natural History of Stroke in Rochester, Minnesota, 1955 Through 1969: An Extension of a Previous Study, 1945 Through 1954 , 1973, Stroke.

[20]  J. Cummings,et al.  Frontal-subcortical circuits and human behavior. , 1993, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[21]  H. Scher,et al.  Brief assessment of cognitive impairment in patients with stroke. , 1989, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[22]  B. Wilson Success and Failure in Memory Training Following a Cerebral Vascular Accident , 1982, Cortex.

[23]  David Lee Gordon,et al.  Classification of Subtype of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Definitions for Use in a Multicenter Clinical Trial , 1993, Stroke.

[24]  C. Date,et al.  Epidemiology of cerebrovascular disease in Japan. , 1973, Osaka city medical journal.

[25]  J. Bogousslavsky,et al.  Value of stroke data banks for the analysis of clinical syndromes. , 1994, Neuroepidemiology.

[26]  M M Mesulam,et al.  Large‐scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory , 1990, Annals of neurology.

[27]  R. Hewer,et al.  Selected cognitive losses after stroke. Frequency, recovery and prognostic importance. , 1989, International disability studies.

[28]  H. L. Bleich,et al.  The Harvard Cooperative Stroke Registry , 1978, Neurology.

[29]  M. Brainin Overview of stroke data banks. , 1994, Neuroepidemiology.

[30]  G. Donnan,et al.  Patterns of stroke. An analysis of the first 700 consecutive admissions to the Austin Hospital Stroke Unit. , 1983, Australian and New Zealand journal of medicine.

[31]  M. Mesulam Frontal cortex and behavior , 1986, Annals of neurology.

[32]  K. D. Rosman The epidemiology of stroke in an urban black population. , 1986, Stroke.

[33]  Y. Stern,et al.  Cognitive impairment after stroke: frequency, patterns, and relationship to functional abilities. , 1994, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[34]  L. T. Carter,et al.  Effectiveness of cognitive skill remediation in acute stroke patients. , 1983, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[35]  A. Kertesz,et al.  The epidemiology of aphasic and cognitive impairment in stroke: age, sex, aphasia type and laterality differences. , 1981, Brain : a journal of neurology.