Evaluation of biomechanical properties of human skin.

Measurement of the physical properties of skin may seem "esoteric" and of little relevance to clinical science; however, the noninvasive nature of available techniques provides unique opportunities for monitoring the effects of disease, drugs, or cosmetics over time on exactly the same area of skin. In vitro testing gives repeatable standardized methods that can supply basic elastic and viscoelastic moduli for skin, which for low strain are comparable to results obtained from in vivo tests. Interpretation of in vivo tests can be difficult, as no analytical model has been developed that can relate measurements from these tests directly to basic skin properties. Each method and each implementation of that method has subtle differences from every other method so that results between studies are difficult to compare; however, the alternative to the bioengineering tests is the hand and eye, which provide subjective (and often biased), nonlinear, and notoriously variable data between individuals. Judging the severity of involvement, the changes due to treatment or progress of disease, and the efficacy of competing treatments is very difficult, even for an experienced clinician. Objective, numerical information on the effects of different active compounds and their formulations is essential if new preparations are to be optimized. Measurement of mechanical properties is one aspect of this important field of endeavor.

[1]  J L Burton,et al.  A rapid increase in skin extensibility due to prednisolone , 1973, The British journal of dermatology.

[2]  Shabtay Dikstein,et al.  The dependence of low-pressure indentation, slackness, and surface pH on age in forehead skin of women , 1984 .

[3]  W. C. Hutton,et al.  Effects of treatment with prednisolone and PUVA on the mechanical properties of human skin in vivo , 1981 .

[4]  J C Barbenel,et al.  The time-dependent mechanical properties of skin. , 1977, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[5]  P Bjerring Skin elasticity measured by dynamic admittance. A new technique for mechanical measurements in patients with scleroderma. , 1985, Acta dermato-venereologica. Supplementum.

[6]  J Serup,et al.  Localized scleroderma (morphoea). Clinical, physiological, biochemical and ultrastructural studies with particular reference to quantitation of scleroderma. , 1986, Acta dermato-venereologica. Supplementum.

[7]  H I Maibach,et al.  In vivo biophysical characterization of skin physiological differences in races. , 1991, Dermatologica.

[8]  Kuiper Jp,et al.  The alinear viscoelastic properties of human skin in vivo related to sex and age , 1981 .

[9]  R. F. Landel,et al.  The rheological properties of human skin and scar tissue , 1981 .

[10]  H. G. Vogel,et al.  Age dependence of mechanical and biochemical properties of human skin. I: Stress-strain experiments, skin thickness and biochemical analysis , 1987 .

[11]  J. Lévêque,et al.  Age-related mechanical properties of human skin: an in vivo study. , 1989, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[12]  W C Hutton,et al.  The mechanical properties of skin in vivo—a portable hand‐held extensometer , 1979, The British journal of dermatology.

[13]  R O Potts,et al.  The dynamic mechanical properties of human skin in vivo. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  M R Neuman,et al.  Direct quantitation of skin elasticity in systemic sclerosis. , 1990, The Journal of rheumatology.

[15]  H I Maibach,et al.  Mechanical properties of human forearm and vulvar skin , 1990, The British journal of dermatology.

[16]  T Ohura,et al.  Postoperative Evaluation in Plastic Surgery Using the Bio-Skin Tension Meter , 1980, Annals of plastic surgery.

[17]  V. Falanga,et al.  Use of a durometer to assess skin hardness. , 1993, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[18]  J Serup,et al.  The Effect of Superficial Hydration on the Mechanical Properties of Human Skin in Vivo: Implications for Plastic Surgery , 1990, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[19]  R Grahame,et al.  The influence of ageing on the in vivo elasticity of human skin. , 1969, Gerontologia.

[20]  L. Goldsmith,et al.  My organ is bigger than your organ. , 1990, Archives of dermatology.

[21]  J. Lévêque,et al.  In vivo study of scleroderma by non‐invasive techniques , 1990, The British journal of dermatology.

[22]  T Ohura,et al.  The extensibility in human skin: variation according to age and site. , 1991, British journal of plastic surgery.

[23]  P. Payne,et al.  Bioengineering and the Skin , 1981, Springer Netherlands.

[24]  J L Leveque,et al.  An in vivo assessment of the biomechanical properties of human skin modifications under the influence of cosmetic products , 1985, International journal of cosmetic science.

[25]  G. Compagno,et al.  A ballistometer for the study of the plasto-elastic properties of skin. , 1977, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[26]  B Finlay,et al.  The torsional characteristics of human skin in vivo. , 1971, Biomedical engineering.

[27]  R. M. Kenedi,et al.  Bed Sore Biomechanics , 1976 .

[28]  E KIRK,et al.  Quantitative measurements of the elastic properties of the skin and subcutaneous tissue in young and old individuals. , 1949, Journal of gerontology.

[29]  Pieter Wijn,et al.  The alinear viscoelastic properties of human skin in vivo for small deformations , 1980 .

[30]  P. Corcuff,et al.  In Vivo Studies of the Evolution of Physical Properties of the Human Skin with Age , 1984, International journal of dermatology.

[31]  H Alexander,et al.  Accounting for natural tension in the mechanical testing of human skin. , 1977, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[32]  C. W. Hargens The gas bearing electrodynamometer (GBE) applied to measuring mechanical changes in skin and other tissues , 1981 .

[33]  R O Potts,et al.  Changes with age in the moisture content of human skin. , 1985, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[34]  Y Lanir,et al.  Influence of ageing on the in vivo mechanics of the skin. , 1993, Skin pharmacology : the official journal of the Skin Pharmacology Society.

[35]  L Robert,et al.  Study of skin ageing as a function of social and professional conditions: modification of the rheological parameters measured with a noninvasive method--indentometry. , 1988, Gerontology.

[36]  K. Langer On the anatomy and physiology of the skin: III. The elasticity of the cutis , 1978 .

[37]  H. G. Vogel,et al.  Age dependence of mechanical and biochemical properties of human skin. II: Hysteresis, relaxation, creep and repeated strain experiments , 1987 .