Meta-Analysis of Genomic Data: Between Strengths, Weaknesses and New Perspective

The rapid advances in high-throughput technologies, such as microarrays have revolutionizing the knowledge and understanding of biological systems and genetic signatures of human diseases. This has led to the generation and accumulation of a large amount of genomic data that need to be adequately integrated to obtain more reliable and valid results than those from individual experiments. Meta-analysis of microarray data is one of the most common statistical techniques used for combining multiple data sets. Despite its remarkable successes in discovering molecular subtypes, underlying pathways and biomarkers for the pathological process of interest, this method possesses several limitations. Here, we provided a briefly overview of current meta-analytic approaches together with the basic critical issues in performing meta-analysis of genomic data, with the aim of helping researchers to evaluate the quality of existing, published data and obtain more detailed information on what will be the best strategy to adopt to execute a good meta-analysis.

[1]  M. Eijkemans,et al.  An Application of Sequential Meta-Analysis to Gene Expression Studies , 2015, Cancer informatics.

[2]  Maria Keays,et al.  ArrayExpress update—trends in database growth and links to data analysis tools , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[3]  Atul J Butte,et al.  Robust meta-analysis of gene expression using the elastic net , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[4]  T. Barrette,et al.  Meta-analysis of microarrays: interstudy validation of gene expression profiles reveals pathway dysregulation in prostate cancer. , 2002, Cancer research.

[5]  Dennis B. Troup,et al.  NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets—10 years on , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[6]  Ola Larsson,et al.  Lack of correct data format and comparability limits future integrative microarray research , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[7]  Jianguo Xia,et al.  NetworkAnalyst for statistical, visual and network-based meta-analysis of gene expression data , 2015, Nature Protocols.

[8]  Kenneth W Witwer,et al.  Data submission and quality in microarray-based microRNA profiling. , 2013, Clinical chemistry.

[9]  Jason E. Stewart,et al.  Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)—toward standards for microarray data , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[10]  Rickard Sandberg,et al.  Comparative microarray analysis. , 2006, Omics : a journal of integrative biology.

[11]  Cristina Mitrea,et al.  A novel bi-level meta-analysis approach: applied to biological pathway analysis , 2016, Bioinform..

[12]  B. De Moor,et al.  Comparison and meta-analysis of microarray data: from the bench to the computer desk. , 2003, Trends in genetics : TIG.