The appropriateness of use of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in New York State.

OBJECTIVE To determine the appropriateness of use of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in New York State. DESIGN Retrospective randomized medical record. SETTING Fifteen randomly selected hospitals in New York State that provide PTCA. PATIENTS Random sample of 1306 patients undergoing PTCA in New York State in 1990. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Percentage of patients who underwent PTCA for indications rated appropriate, uncertain, and inappropriate. RESULTS The majority of patients received PTCA for chronic stable angina, unstable angina, and in the post-myocardial infarction period (up to 3 weeks). Fifty-eight percent of PTCAs were rated appropriate; 38%, uncertain; and 4%, inappropriate. The inappropriate rate varied by hospital from 1% to 9% (P = .12); the uncertain rate, from 26% to 50% (P = .02); and the combined inappropriate and uncertain rate, from 29% to 57% (P < .001). There was no difference in appropriateness when the institutions were grouped by volume (fewer than 300 procedures annually or at least 300 procedures annually), location (upstate vs downstate), or by teaching status. CONCLUSIONS Few PTCAs were performed for inappropriate indications in New York State. However, the large number of procedures performed for indications that were rated uncertain as to their net benefit requires further study and justification at both clinical and policy levels.

[1]  L. Leape,et al.  The appropriateness of use of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in New York State. , 1993, JAMA.

[2]  L. Leape,et al.  The appropriateness of use of coronary angiography in New York State. , 1993, JAMA.

[3]  H. Herrmann,et al.  Coronary angiography and interventional cardiology. , 1992, Current opinion in radiology.

[4]  J. Vacek,et al.  Prognosis of culprit lesion PTCA in acute myocardial infarction for multi versus single vessel disease. , 1991, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[5]  R. Vlietstra Advances in coronary interventional techniques. , 1991, International journal of cardiology.

[6]  Graves Ej,et al.  Detailed diagnoses and procedures, National Hospital Discharge Survey, 1994. , 1997, Vital and health statistics. Series 13, Data from the National Health Survey.

[7]  E. Tuzcu,et al.  Changing patterns in percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1989, American heart journal.

[8]  S. King Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: the second decade. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  T. Ryan Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  D. Kanouse,et al.  The appropriateness of performing coronary artery bypass surgery. , 1988, JAMA.

[11]  R. Brook,et al.  How coronary angiography is used. Clinical determinants of appropriateness. , 1987, JAMA.

[12]  H V Anderson,et al.  Primary angiographic success rates of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1985, The American journal of cardiology.