Lordosis Recreation in Transforaminal and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Cadaveric Study of the Influence of Surgical Bone Resection and Cage Angle.

STUDY DESIGN Controlled cadaveric study of surgical technique in transforaminal and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF and PLIF) OBJECTIVE.: To evaluate the contribution of surgical techniques and cage variables in lordosis recreation in posterior interbody fusion (TLIF/PLIF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The major contributors to lumbar lordosis are the lordotic lower lumbar discs. The pathologies requiring treatment with segmental fusion are frequently hypolordotic or kyphotic. Current posterior based interbody techniques have a poor track record for recreating lordosis, although recreation of lordosis with optimum anatomical alignment is associated with better outcomes and reduced adjacent segment change needing revision. It is unclear whether surgical techniques or cage parameters contribute significantly to lordosis recreation. METHODS Eight instrumented cadaveric motion segments were evaluated with pre and post experimental radiological assessment of lordosis. Each motion segment was instrumented with pedicle screw fixation to allow segmental stabilization. The surgical procedures were unilateral TLIF with an 18° lordotic and 27 mm length cage, unilateral TLIF (18°, 27 mm) with bilateral facetectomy, unilateral TLIF (18°, 27 mm) with posterior column osteotomy (PCO), PLIF with bilateral cages (18°, 22 mm), and PLIF with bilateral cages (24°, 22 mm). Cage insertion used and "insert and rotate" technique. RESULTS Pooled results demonstrated a mean increase in lordosis of 2.2° with each procedural step (lordosis increase was serially 1.8°, 3.5°, 1.6°, 2.5°, and 1.6° through the procedures). TLIF and PLIF with PCO increased lordosis significantly compared with unilateral TLIF and TLIF with bilateral facetectomy. The major contributors to lordosis recreation were PCO, and PLIF with paired shorter cages rather than TLIF. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that the surgical approach to posterior interbody surgery influences lordosis gain and PCO optimizes lordosis gain in TLIF. The bilateral cages used in PLIF are shorter and associated with further gain in lordosis. This information has the potential to aid surgical planning when attempting to recreate lordosis to optimize outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE N/A.

[1]  P. Robertson,et al.  Do position and size matter? An analysis of cage and placement variables for optimum lordosis in PLIF reconstruction , 2017, European Spine Journal.

[2]  Young-Seok Lee,et al.  Symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration at the L3–4 level after fusion surgery at the L4–5 level: evaluation of the risk factors and 10-year incidence , 2015, European Spine Journal.

[3]  N. Hamajima,et al.  Adjacent Segment Disease After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Based on Cases With a Minimum of 10 Years of Follow-up , 2015, Spine.

[4]  D. Polly,et al.  Radiographic Comparison of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Traditional Fusion Approaches: Analysis of Sagittal Contour Change , 2015, International Journal of Spine Surgery.

[5]  R. Watkins,et al.  Sagittal Alignment After Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparing Anterior, Lateral, and Transforaminal Approaches , 2014, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[6]  Malhar N. Kumar,et al.  Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion , 2001, European Spine Journal.

[7]  D. Brodke,et al.  Early Proximal Junctional Failure in Patients with Preoperative Sagittal Imbalance , 2013, Evidence-Based Spine-Care Journal.

[8]  L. Lenke,et al.  Transforaminal Versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Long Deformity Constructs: A Matched Cohort Analysis , 2013, Spine.

[9]  Kai-Ming G. Fu,et al.  The SRS-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: assessment and clinical correlations based on a prospective operative and nonoperative cohort. , 2012, Neurosurgery.

[10]  O. Boachie-Adjei,et al.  Sagittal realignment failures following pedicle subtraction osteotomy surgery: are we doing enough?: Clinical article. , 2012, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[11]  Cameron Walker,et al.  Spinous process morphology: the effect of ageing through adulthood on spinous process size and relationship to sagittal alignment , 2012, European Spine Journal.

[12]  Kai-Ming G. Fu,et al.  RADIOGRAPHIC RESTORATION OF LUMBAR ALIGNMENT AFTER TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION , 2009, Neurosurgery.

[13]  Patrick C. Hsieh,et al.  Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in comparison with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: implications for the restoration of foraminal height, local disc angle, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal balance. , 2007, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[14]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[15]  Luiz Henrique Fonseca Damasceno,et al.  Lordose lombar: estudo dos valores angulares e da participação dos corpos vertebrais e discos intervertebrais , 2006 .

[16]  J. Pélissier,et al.  Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis , 2006, European Spine Journal.

[17]  W. Sears.  Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: restoration of sagittal balance using insert-and-rotate interbody spacers. , 2005, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[18]  P. Roussouly,et al.  Classification of the Normal Variation in the Sagittal Alignment of the Human Lumbar Spine and Pelvis in the Standing Position , 2005, Spine.

[19]  Wafa Skalli,et al.  Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[20]  C. Niu,et al.  The effect of sagittal alignment on adjacent joint mobility after lumbar instrumentation--a biomechanical study of lumbar vertebrae in a porcine model. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[21]  Manabu Ito,et al.  In vitro biomechanical effects of reconstruction on adjacent motion segment: comparison of aligned/kyphotic posterolateral fusion with aligned posterior lumbar interbody fusion/posterolateral fusion. , 2003, Journal of neurosurgery.

[22]  D. Kohn,et al.  Influence of Cage Geometry on Sagittal Alignment in Instrumented Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion , 2003, Spine.

[23]  A. Patwardhan,et al.  The biomechanical effect of postoperative hypolordosis in instrumented lumbar fusion on instrumented and adjacent spinal segments. , 2000, Spine.

[24]  B. Cunningham,et al.  Does spinal kyphotic deformity influence the biomechanical characteristics of the adjacent motion segments? An in vivo animal model. , 1999, Spine.

[25]  J. Hecquet,et al.  Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves , 1998, European Spine Journal.