A multi-resolution envelope-power based model for speech intelligibility.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] G. A. Miller,et al. The masking of speech. , 1947, Psychological bulletin.
[2] G. A. Miller,et al. The Intelligibility of Interrupted Speech , 1948 .
[3] D. Dirks,et al. Effect of pulsed masking on selected speech materials. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[4] A. M. Mimpen,et al. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. , 1979, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[5] T. Houtgast,et al. Predicting speech intelligibility in rooms from the modulation transfer function, I. General room acoustics , 1980 .
[6] B Hagerman,et al. Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. , 1982, Scandinavian audiology.
[7] Brian R Glasberg,et al. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.
[8] R. Plomp,et al. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[9] S. Rosen,et al. Uncomodulated glimpsing in "checkerboard" noise. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[10] S. Soli,et al. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[11] T. Dau,et al. Intrinsic envelope fluctuations and modulation-detection thresholds for narrow-band noise carriers. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[12] B. Kollmeier,et al. Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation. II. Spectral and temporal integration. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[13] B. Kollmeier,et al. Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation. I. Detection and masking with narrow-band carriers. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[14] B. Kollmeier,et al. Within-channel cues in comodulation masking release (CMR): experiments and model predictions using a modulation-filterbank model. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[15] T. Dau,et al. Characterizing frequency selectivity for envelope fluctuations. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[16] Kohlrausch,et al. The influence of carrier level and frequency on modulation and beat-detection thresholds for sinusoidal carriers , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[17] H Müsch,et al. Using statistical decision theory to predict speech intelligibility. I. Model structure. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[18] T. Dau,et al. Spectro-temporal processing in the envelope-frequency domain. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[19] Mounya Elhilali,et al. A spectro-temporal modulation index (STMI) for assessment of speech intelligibility , 2003, Speech Commun..
[20] K. Wagener,et al. Design, optimization and evaluation of a Danish sentence test in noise: Diseño, optimización y evaluación de la prueba Danesa de frases en ruido , 2003, International journal of audiology.
[21] K. S. Rhebergen,et al. A Speech Intelligibility Index-based approach to predict the speech reception threshold for sentences in fluctuating noise for normal-hearing listeners. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[22] Martin Cooke,et al. A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[23] T. Houtgast,et al. Factors affecting masking release for speech in modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[24] K. S. Rhebergen,et al. Extended speech intelligibility index for the prediction of the speech reception threshold in fluctuating noise. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[25] Tammo Houtgast,et al. The combined effects of reverberation and nonstationary noise on sentence intelligibility. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[26] T. Houtgast,et al. The concept of signal-to-noise ratio in the modulation domain and speech intelligibility. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[27] Torsten Dau,et al. Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[28] Deliang Wang,et al. Role of mask pattern in intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[29] N. J. Versfeld,et al. The dynamic range of speech, compression, and its effect on the speech reception threshold in stationary and interrupted noise. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[30] Torsten Dau,et al. Development of a Danish speech intelligibility test , 2009, International journal of audiology.
[31] Emily Buss,et al. Masking release for words in amplitude-modulated noise as a function of modulation rate and task. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[32] Birger Kollmeier,et al. Development and analysis of an International Speech Test Signal (ISTS) , 2010, International journal of audiology.
[33] Torsten Dau,et al. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.