How Preferences for Public Participation are Linked to Perceptions of the Context, Preferences for Outcomes, and Individual Characteristics

Practitioners and stakeholders involved in environmental and risk assessment and decision-making efforts have access to a growing list of policies and guidance for implementing good process. The advice is often general. There is little understanding of how situation specific features are relevant in new circumstances. In a series of ten case studies we investigated how people’s (a) perceptions of the context, (b) preferences for outcomes, and (c) affiliations, experiences and motivations are related to their preferences for process features in a particular situation. The cases are in three policy areas: watershed management, forestry management, and clean-up and public health management of radioactively contaminated sites. We conclude this paper with a discussion of how the results can inform process design. Process design should be based on a diagnostic approach that specifically assesses relevant situational characteristics.

[1]  Seth Tuler,et al.  Competing perspectives on public involvement: Planning for risk characterization and risk communication about radiological contamination from a national laboratory , 2005 .

[2]  Thomas L. Jacobson,et al.  Governance Reform Under Real-World Conditions: Citizens, Stakeholders, and Voice , 2008 .

[3]  Nicole Darnall,et al.  Involving the Public: When Are Surveys and Stakeholder Interviews Effective?1 , 2004 .

[4]  Seth Tuler,et al.  Forms of talk in policy dialogue: distinguishing between adversarial and collaborative discourse , 2000 .

[5]  Bernd Rohrmann,et al.  The evaluation of risk communication effectiveness , 1992 .

[6]  D. Stone,et al.  Causal Stories and the Formation of Policy Agendas , 1989, Anthologie Kulturpolitik.

[7]  S. Charnley,et al.  Evaluating public participation in environmental decision-making: EPA's superfund community involvement program. , 2005, Journal of environmental management.

[8]  Jay Sullivan,et al.  Public participation and appeals of forest service plans—An empirical examination , 1994 .

[9]  Jennifer Peeples,et al.  Arguments For What No One Wants: The Narratives of Waste Storage Proponents , 2008 .

[10]  H. Fineberg,et al.  Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1996 .

[11]  T. Webler,et al.  Competing Perspectives on a Process for Making Remediation and Stewardship Decisions at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site , 2006 .

[12]  Facilitators, Coordinators, and Outcomes , 2003 .

[13]  P. Stern,et al.  Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making , 2008 .

[14]  Competing Perspectives on Public Participation in National Park Service Planning: The Boston Harbor Islands National Park Area , 2004 .

[15]  Kristi M. Branch,et al.  An Evaluation of DOE-EM Public Participation Programs , 2003 .

[16]  Bronwyn L Horsey,et al.  Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability , 2007 .

[17]  B. Johnson,et al.  Organizational Learning about Public Participation: “Tiggers” and “Eeyores” , 2006 .

[18]  Steven R. Brown.  Q Methodology and Qualitative Research , 1996 .

[19]  Michael S. Lewis-Beck,et al.  New Tools for Social Scientists. , 1987 .

[20]  Steve Rayner,et al.  Management of Radiation Hazards in Hospitals: Plural Rationalities in a Single Institution , 1986 .

[21]  T. Tyler,et al.  The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice , 1988 .

[22]  Johannes A. Zuber,et al.  Choice shift and group polarization : an analysis of the status of arguments and social decision schemes , 1992 .

[23]  T. Webler,et al.  What Is a Good Public Participation Process? Five Perspectives from the Public , 2001, Environmental management.

[24]  Michael D. Cobb,et al.  Potential Solutions to Public Deliberation Problems: Structured Deliberations and Polarization Cascades , 2006 .

[25]  C. Chess,et al.  Evaluating Citizen Advisory Boards: The Importance of Theory and Participant‐Based Criteria and Practical Implications , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[26]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Risk Analysis and Society: The Challenge of Integrating Deliberation and Expertise: Participation and Discourse in Risk Management , 2003 .

[27]  Matthew Potoski.  Politics, Policy, and Organizations: Frontiers in the Scientific Study of Bureaucracy , 2006, Perspectives on Politics.

[28]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Global Risk Governance , 2008 .

[29]  Mitchell J. Small,et al.  Risk Analysis and Society: An Interdisciplinary Characterization of the Field , 2003 .

[30]  P. Sabatier,et al.  Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: Evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington , 2002 .

[31]  Roy Marsh,et al.  Evaluation of a Deliberative Conference , 2004 .

[32]  L. Duram,et al.  Insights and Applications Assessing Public Participation in U.S. Watershed Planning Initiatives , 1999 .

[33]  Craig W. Trumbo,et al.  Why Citizens Do and Do Not Attend Public Meetings about Local Cancer Cluster Investigations , 2006 .

[34]  Rosemary O'Leary,et al.  Promise and Performance Of Environmental Conflict Resolution , 2003 .

[35]  N. Ash́ford,et al.  Public Participation in Contaminated Communities , 2001 .

[36]  Thomas C. Beierle.  Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Environmental Decisions , 2010 .

[37]  J. A. Bradbury,et al.  An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Local Site-Specific Advisory Boards for US Department of Energy Environmental Restoration Programs , 1999 .

[38]  Susan A. Moore,et al.  Assessing Representation at Different Scales of Decision Making: Rethinking Local is Better , 2006 .

[39]  Seth Tuler,et al.  Four Perspectives on Public Participation Process in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making: Combined Results from 10 Case Studies , 2006 .

[40]  Kai N. Lee.  Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment, Kai N. Lee. 1993. Island Press, Washington, DC. 290 pages. ISBN: 1-59963-197-X. $25.00 , 1993 .

[41]  P. Stern,et al.  Decision making for the environment : social and behavioral science research priorities , 2005 .

[42]  Martin Schweitzer,et al.  Measuring the success of public participation on environmental restoration and waste management activities in the U.S. Department of Energy , 1998 .

[43]  Ortwin Renn.  Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World , 2008 .